The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
European cancer mortality predictions for the year 2018 with focus on colorectal cancer
Open accessAbstract
Background: We projected cancer mortality statistics for 2018 for the European Union (EU) and its six more populous countries, using the most recent available data. We focused on colorectal cancer. Materials and methods: We obtained cancer death certification data from stomach, colorectum, pancreas, lung, breast, uterus, ovary, prostate, bladder, leukaemia, and total cancers from the World Health Organisation database and projected population data from Eurostat. We derived figures for France, Germany, Italy, Poland, Spain, the UK, and the EU in 1970-2012. We predicted death numbers by age group and age-standardized (world population) rates for 2018 through joinpoint regression models. Results: EU total cancer mortality rates are predicted to decline by 10.3% in men between 2012 and 2018, reaching a predicted rate of 128.9/100 000, and by 5.0% in women with a rate of 83.6. The predicted total number of cancer deaths is 1 382 000 when compared with 1 333 362 in 2012 (+3.6%). We confirmed a further fall in male lung cancer, but an unfavourable trend in females, with a rate of 14.7/100 000 for 2018 (13.9 in 2012, +5.8%) and 94 500 expected deaths, higher than the rate of 13.7 and 92 700 deaths from breast cancer. Colorectal cancer predicted rates are 15.8/100 000 men (-6.7%) and 9.2 in women (-7.5%); declines are expected in all age groups. Pancreatic cancer is stable in men, but in women it rose +2.8% since 2012. Ovarian, uterine and bladder cancer rates are predicted to decline further. In 2018 alone, about 392 300 cancer deaths were avoided compared with peak rates in the late 1980s. Conclusion: We predicted continuing falls in mortality rates from major cancer sites in the EU and its major countries to 2018. Exceptions are pancreatic cancer and lung cancer in women. Improved treatment and-above age 50 years-organized screening may account for recent favourable colorectal cancer trends.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Writing Group for the Women's Health Initiative Investigators (2002) · JAMA: The Journal of the American Medical Association · doi:10.1001/jama.288.3.321 · Cited by 15,889
Cited by
FOLFIRINOX or Gemcitabine as Adjuvant Therapy for Pancreatic Cancer
Conroy, T., Hammel, P., Hebbar, M., Ben Abdelghani, M., Wei, A. C., Raoul, J.-L., Choné, L., Francois, E., Artru, P., Biagi, J. J., et al. (2018) · New England Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1056/nejmoa1809775 · Cited by 2,874
Cervantes, A., Adam, R., Roselló, S., Arnold, D., Normanno, N., Taïeb, J., Seligmann, J., De Baere, T., Osterlund, P., Yoshino, T., et al. (2023) · Annals of Oncology · doi:10.1016/j.annonc.2022.10.003 · Cited by 1,796
Heterogeneity in Colorectal Cancer: A Challenge for Personalized Medicine?
Molinari, C., Marisi, G., Passardi, A., Matteucci, L., De Maio, G., & Ulivi, P. (2018) · International Journal of Molecular Sciences · doi:10.3390/ijms19123733 · Cited by 262
Costantini, L., Magno, S., Albanese, D., Donati, C., Molinari, R., Filippone, A., Masetti, R., & Merendino, N. (2018) · Scientific Reports · doi:10.1038/s41598-018-35329-z · Cited by 144
Metadata
- Authors
- Malvezzi, M., Carioli, G., Bertuccio, P., Boffetta, P., Levi, F., La Vecchia, C., & Negri, E.
- Venue
- Annals of Oncology
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2018-04
- Volume
- 29
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 1016-1022
- ISSN
- 0923-7534 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2792203605
- Cited by
- 211
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 11.96
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: European cancer mortality predictions for the year 2018 with focus on colorectal cancer. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1093/annonc/mdy033
- The paper
- Malvezzi, M., Carioli, G., Bertuccio, P., Boffetta, P., Levi, F., La Vecchia, C., & Negri, E. (2018). European cancer mortality predictions for the year 2018 with focus on colorectal cancer. Annals of Oncology. https://doi.org/10.1093/annonc/mdy033
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.