Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 776

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Final validation of the ProMisE molecular classifier for endometrial carcinoma in a large population-based case series

Open access
Kommoss, S., McConechy, M.K., Kommoss, F., Leung, S., Bunz, A., Magrill, J., Britton, H., Kommoss, F., Grevenkamp, F., Karnezis, A., Yang, W., Lum, A., Krämer, B., Taran, F., Staebler, A., Lax, S., Brucker, S.Y., Huntsman, D.G., Gilks, C.B., McAlpine, J.N., Talhouk., A.·2018·Annals of Oncology

Abstract

Background: We have previously developed and confirmed a pragmatic molecular classifier for endometrial cancers; ProMisE (Proactive Molecular Risk Classifier for Endometrial Cancer). Inspired by the Cancer Genome Atlas, ProMisE identifies four prognostically distinct molecular subtypes and can be applied to diagnostic specimens (biopsy/curettings) enabling earlier informed decision-making. We have strictly adhered to the Institute of Medicine (IOM) guidelines for the development of genomic biomarkers, and herein present the final validation step of a locked-down classifier before clinical application. Patients and methods: We assessed a retrospective cohort of women from the Tübingen University Women's Hospital treated for endometrial carcinoma between 2003 and 2013. Primary outcomes of overall, disease-specific, and progression-free survival were evaluated for clinical, pathological, and molecular features. Results: Complete clinical and molecular data were evaluable from 452 women. Patient age ranged from 29 to 93 (median 65) years, and 87.8% cases were endometrioid histotype. Grade distribution included 282 (62.4%) G1, 75 (16.6%) G2, and 95 (21.0%) G3 tumors. 276 (61.1%) patients had stage IA disease, with the remaining stage IB [89 (19.7%)], stage II [26 (5.8%)], and stage III/IV [61 (13.5%)]. ProMisE molecular classification yielded 127 (28.1%) MMR-D, 42 (9.3%) POLE, 55 (12.2%) p53abn, and 228 (50.4%) p53wt. ProMisE was a prognostic marker for progression-free (P = 0.001) and disease-specific (P = 0.03) survival even after adjusting for known risk factors. Concordance between diagnostic and surgical specimens was highly favorable; accuracy 0.91, κ 0.88. Discussion: We have developed, confirmed, and now validated a pragmatic molecular classification tool (ProMisE) that provides consistent categorization of tumors and identifies four distinct prognostic molecular subtypes. ProMisE can be applied to diagnostic samples and thus could be used to inform surgical procedure(s) and/or need for adjuvant therapy. Based on the IOM guidelines this classifier is now ready for clinical evaluation through prospective clinical trials.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1093/annonc/mdy058

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 2 references

Cited by

See all 776

Metadata

Authors
Kommoss, S., McConechy, M. K., Kommoss, F., Leung, S., Bunz, A., Magrill, J., Britton, H., Kommoss, F., Grevenkamp, F., Karnezis, A., Yang, W., Lum, A., Krämer, B., Taran, F., Staebler, A., Lax, S., Brucker, S. Y., Huntsman, D. G., Gilks, C. B., McAlpine, J. N., & Talhouk., A.
Venue
Annals of Oncology
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2018-05
Volume
29
Issue
5
Pages
1180-1188
ISSN
0923-7534 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2793281906
Cited by
776
References
2
FWCI
46.58
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
hybrid

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Final validation of the ProMisE molecular classifier for endometrial carcinoma in a large population-based case series. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1093/annonc/mdy058
The paper
Kommoss, S., McConechy, M. K., Kommoss, F., Leung, S., Bunz, A., Magrill, J., Britton, H., Kommoss, F., Grevenkamp, F., Karnezis, A., Yang, W., Lum, A., Krämer, B., Taran, F., Staebler, A., Lax, S., Brucker, S. Y., Huntsman, D. G., Gilks, C. B., . . . Talhouk., A. (2018). Final validation of the ProMisE molecular classifier for endometrial carcinoma in a large population-based case series. Annals of Oncology. https://doi.org/10.1093/annonc/mdy058

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.