The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Alectinib versus chemotherapy in crizotinib-pretreated anaplastic lymphoma kinase (ALK)-positive non-small-cell lung cancer: results from the phase III ALUR study
Open accessAbstract
Background: This is the first trial to directly compare efficacy and safety of alectinib versus standard chemotherapy in advanced/metastatic anaplastic lymphoma kinase (ALK)-positive non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients who have progressed on, or were intolerant to, crizotinib. Patients and methods: ALUR (MO29750; NCT02604342) was a randomized, multicenter, open-label, phase III trial of alectinib versus chemotherapy in advanced/metastatic ALK-positive NSCLC patients previously treated with platinum-based doublet chemotherapy and crizotinib. Patients were randomized 2 : 1 to receive alectinib 600 mg twice daily or chemotherapy (pemetrexed 500 mg/m2 or docetaxel 75 mg/m2, both every 3 weeks) until disease progression, death, or withdrawal. Primary end point was investigator-assessed progression-free survival (PFS). Results: Altogether, 107 patients were randomized (alectinib, n = 72; chemotherapy, n = 35) in 13 countries across Europe and Asia. Median investigator-assessed PFS was 9.6 months [95% confidence interval (CI): 6.9-12.2] with alectinib and 1.4 months (95% CI: 1.3-1.6) with chemotherapy [hazard ratio (HR) 0.15 (95% CI: 0.08-0.29); P < 0.001]. Independent Review Committee-assessed PFS was also significantly longer with alectinib [HR 0.32 (95% CI: 0.17-0.59); median PFS was 7.1 months (95% CI: 6.3-10.8) with alectinib and 1.6 months (95% CI: 1.3-4.1) with chemotherapy]. In patients with measurable baseline central nervous system (CNS) disease (alectinib, n = 24; chemotherapy, n = 16), CNS objective response rate was significantly higher with alectinib (54.2%) versus chemotherapy (0%; P < 0.001). Grade ≥3 adverse events were more common with chemotherapy (41.2%) than alectinib (27.1%). Incidence of AEs leading to study-drug discontinuation was lower with alectinib (5.7%) than chemotherapy (8.8%), despite alectinib treatment duration being longer (20.1 weeks versus 6.0 weeks). Conclusion: Alectinib significantly improved systemic and CNS efficacy versus chemotherapy for crizotinib-pretreated ALK-positive NSCLC patients, with a favorable safety profile. Trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT02604342; Roche study MO29750.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
First-Line Crizotinib versus Chemotherapy in ALK -Positive Lung Cancer
Solomon, B. J., Mok, T., Kim, D.-W., Wu, Y.-L., Nakagawa, K., Mekhail, T., Felip, E., Cappuzzo, F., Paolini, J., Usari, T., et al. (2014) · New England Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1056/nejmoa1408440 · Cited by 3,190
Alectinib versus Crizotinib in Untreated ALK -Positive Non–Small-Cell Lung Cancer
Peters, S., Camidge, D. R., Shaw, A. T., Gadgeel, S., Ahn, J. S., Kim, D.-W., Ou, S.-H. I., Pérol, M., Dziadziuszko, R., Rosell, R., et al. (2017) · New England Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1056/nejmoa1704795 · Cited by 2,527
Self-citationShaw, A. T., Gandhi, L., Gadgeel, S., Riely, G. J., Cetnar, J., West, H., Camidge, D. R., Socinski, M. A., Chiappori, A., Mekhail, T., et al. (2016) · The Lancet Oncology · doi:10.1016/s1470-2045(15)00488-x · Cited by 638
Self-citation
Cited by
Planchard, D., Popat, S., Kerr, K., Novello, S., Smit, E. F., Faivre-Finn, C., Mok, T. S., Reck, M., Van Schil, P. E., Hellmann, M. D., et al. (2018) · Annals of Oncology · doi:10.1093/annonc/mdy275 · Cited by 2,274
Self-citationHendriks, L. E., Kerr, K. M., Menis, J., Mok, T. S., Nestle, U., Passaro, A., Peters, S., Planchard, D., Smit, E. F., Solomon, B. J., et al. (2023) · Annals of Oncology · doi:10.1016/j.annonc.2022.12.009 · Cited by 853
Solomon, B. J., Besse, B., Bauer, T. M., Felip, E., Soo, R. A., Camidge, D. R., Chiari, R., Bearz, A., Lin, C.-C., Gadgeel, S. M., et al. (2018) · The Lancet Oncology · doi:10.1016/s1470-2045(18)30649-1 · Cited by 791
Non‐small cell lung cancer in China
Chen, P., Liu, Y., Wen, Y., & Zhou, C. (2022) · Cancer Communications · doi:10.1002/cac2.12359 · Cited by 656
Making the first move in EGFR-driven or ALK-driven NSCLC: first-generation or next-generation TKI?
Recondo, G., Facchinetti, F., Olaussen, K. A., Besse, B., & Friboulet, L. (2018) · Nature Reviews Clinical Oncology · doi:10.1038/s41571-018-0081-4 · Cited by 321
Metadata
- Authors
- Novello, S., Mazières, J., Oh, I.-J., de Castro, J., Migliorino, M. R., Helland, Å., Dziadziuszko, R., Griesinger, F., Kotb, A., Zeaiter, A., Cardona, A., Balas, B., Johannsdottir, H. K., Das-Gupta, A., & Wolf, J.
- Venue
- Annals of Oncology
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2018-06
- Volume
- 29
- Issue
- 6
- Pages
- 1409-1416
- ISSN
- 0923-7534 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2796631032
- Cited by
- 335
- References
- 3
- FWCI
- 26.38
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Alectinib versus chemotherapy in crizotinib-pretreated anaplastic lymphoma kinase (ALK)-positive non-small-cell lung cancer: results from the phase III ALUR study. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1093/annonc/mdy121
- The paper
- Novello, S., Mazières, J., Oh, I.-J., de Castro, J., Migliorino, M. R., Helland, Å., Dziadziuszko, R., Griesinger, F., Kotb, A., Zeaiter, A., Cardona, A., Balas, B., Johannsdottir, H. K., Das-Gupta, A., & Wolf, J. (2018). Alectinib versus chemotherapy in crizotinib-pretreated anaplastic lymphoma kinase (ALK)-positive non-small-cell lung cancer: results from the phase III ALUR study. Annals of Oncology. https://doi.org/10.1093/annonc/mdy121
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.