The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Preliminary results of the first-in-human (FIH) study of MK-1454, an agonist of stimulator of interferon genes (STING), as monotherapy or in combination with pembrolizumab (pembro) in patients with advanced solid tumors or lymphomas
Open accessOverview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The cited source doesn’t support the claim as written.
In the citing paper
“early-phase clinical trials with these agents in cancer patients, either as monotherapy or in combination with immune checkpoint inhibitors, have so far shown lack of efficacy26–28.”
From Epigenetic state determines the in vivo efficacy of STING agonist therapy (2023) · cites this paper as [26]
Checked by a reasoning model — may be wrong.
Experimental — accuracy not yet measuredThe cited source doesn’t support the claim as written.
In the citing paper
“However, clinical trials in cancer patients currently testing STING activating drugs as a monotherapy or in combination with immune checkpoint inhibitors have so far provided little, if any, evidence of objective responses26–28.”
From Epigenetic state determines the in vivo efficacy of STING agonist therapy (2023) · cites this paper as [26]
Checked by a reasoning model — may be wrong.
Experimental — accuracy not yet measuredIn the citing paper
“The preliminary data showed that some combination therapies (e.g. ADU-S100 plus spartalizumab, MK-1454 plus pembrolizumab, manganese plus α-PD-1) had encouraging antitumor activity with a tolerable safety profile [270, 275, 276].”
From Combination strategies with PD-1/PD-L1 blockade: current advances and future directions (2022) · cites this paper as [276]
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Items 101–200 of 275
The clinical and molecular significance associated with STING signaling in breast cancer
Parkes, E. E., Humphries, M. P., Gilmore, E. S., Sidi, F. A., Bingham, V., Phyu, S. M., Craig, S. G., Graham, C., Miller, J. J., Griffin, D., et al. (2021) · npj Breast Cancer · doi:10.1038/s41523-021-00283-z · Cited by 37
Update of early phase clinical trials in cancer immunotherapy
Lee, D. H. (2021) · BMB Reports · doi:10.5483/bmbrep.2021.54.1.242 · Cited by 37
“MK-1454 was shown to be safe as monotherapy and in clinical activity in combination with pembrolizumab with an ORR of 24% (103).”
BackgroundIndustrially Relevant Enzyme Cascades for Drug Synthesis and Their Ecological Assessment
Siedentop, R., & Rosenthal, K. (2022) · International Journal of Molecular Sciences · doi:10.3390/ijms23073605 · Cited by 37
“It could be used as vaccine adjuvant and derivatives of this natural compound are investigated for their treatment of cancer of which one is already in clinical phase 2 [66,67].”
BackgroundLin, D. J., Ng, J. C. K., Huang, L., Robinson, M., O’Hara, J., Wilson, J. A., & Mellor, A. L. (2021) · Clinical Otolaryngology · doi:10.1111/coa.13794 · Cited by 35
Clinical Strategies Targeting the Tumor Microenvironment of Pancreatic Ductal Adenocarcinoma
Skorupan, N., Domínguez, M. P., Ricci, S. L., & Alewine, C. (2022) · Cancers · doi:10.3390/cancers14174209 · Cited by 35
“The most common adverse events were pyrexia, fatigue, nausea, and pruritus [212].”
BackgroundTargeting STING to generate therapeutic anti-tumor immunity
Fahey, C. G., Cordova, A. F., Gedeon, P. C., & Barbie, D. A. (2025) · Cancer Cell · doi:10.1016/j.ccell.2025.12.002 · Cited by 36
DNA Repair Deficiency in Breast Cancer: Opportunities for Immunotherapy
Gilmore, E. S., McCabe, N., Kennedy, R. D., & Parkes, E. E. (2019) · Journal of Oncology · doi:10.1155/2019/4325105 · Cited by 32
EZH2 Inhibitor Enhances the STING Agonist‒Induced Antitumor Immunity in Melanoma
Xu, T., Dai, J., Tang, L., Yang, L., Si, L., Sheng, X., Cui, C., Chi, Z., Kong, Y., & Guo, J. (2021) · Journal of Investigative Dermatology · doi:10.1016/j.jid.2021.08.437 · Cited by 36
Jiang, X., Luo, T., Yang, K., Lee, M. J., Liu, J., Tillman, L., Zhen, W., Weichselbaum, R. R., & Lin, W. (2024) · Science Advances · doi:10.1126/sciadv.ado0082 · Cited by 34
“Systemic delivery of CDN-based STING agonists is limited by their poor PK and instability in plasma ( 34 , 58 – 60 ).”
Type I interferons in pancreatic cancer and development of new therapeutic approaches
Blaauboer, A., Sideras, K., van Eijck, C. H. J., & Hofland, L. J. (2020) · Critical Reviews in Oncology/Hematology · doi:10.1016/j.critrevonc.2020.103204 · Cited by 30
Cucurull, M., Notario, L., Sánchez‐Céspedes, M., Hierro, C., Estival, A., Carcereny, E., & Saigí, M. (2022) · Frontiers in Oncology · doi:10.3389/fonc.2021.793121 · Cited by 33
“Lung cancer patients with this tumor genetic profile showed a worse response to ICI than did patients with KRASmutant tumors without LKB1 co-mutations (27–30).”
BackgroundInfluentialRIG-I-induced innate antiviral immunity protects mice from lethal SARS-CoV-2 infection
Marx, S., Kümmerer, B. M., Grützner, C., Kato, H., Schlee, M., Renn, M., Bartok, E., & Hartmann, G. (2022) · Molecular Therapy — Nucleic Acids · doi:10.1016/j.omtn.2022.02.008 · Cited by 35
Zhu, C., Jiang, L., Yao, M., & Fang, C. (2021) · BMC Oral Health · doi:10.1186/s12903-021-01813-8 · Cited by 31
Lee, D., Huntoon, K. M., Wang, Y., Kang, M., Lü, Y., Jeong, S. D., Link, T. M., Gallup, T. D., Qie, Y., Li, X., et al. (2024) · Nature Biomedical Engineering · doi:10.1038/s41551-024-01194-7 · Cited by 32
The Role of STING-Mediated Activation of Dendritic Cells in Cancer Immunotherapy
Ribeiro, A. R. S., Neuper, T., & Horejs‐Hoeck, J. (2024) · International Journal of Nanomedicine · doi:10.2147/ijn.s477320 · Cited by 33
“77,125 129 However, the underwhelming results of this approach underline the challenge of applying STING agonists in the clinic.”
BackgroundGangar, M., Goyal, S., Raykar, D., Khurana, P., Martis, A. M., Goswami, A., Ghoshal, I., Patel, K. V., Nagare, Y. K., Raikar, S. S., et al. (2021) · Bioorganic Chemistry · doi:10.1016/j.bioorg.2021.105549 · Cited by 31
Skaličková, M., Vanova, K. H., Uher, O., Fialová, J. L., Petrláková, K., Masařík, M., Kejík, Z., Pavel Martasek, E., Pacák, K., & Jakubek, M. (2025) · Frontiers in Immunology · doi:10.3389/fimmu.2024.1479483 · Cited by 28
Immune-Checkpoint Inhibitors Combinations in Metastatic NSCLC: New Options on the Horizon?
Passiglia, F., Reale, M. L., Cetoretta, V., & Novello, S. (2021) · ImmunoTargets and Therapy · doi:10.2147/itt.s253581 · Cited by 27
Wang, Z., Lu, C., Zhang, K., Lin, C., Wu, F., Tang, X., Wu, D., Dou, Y., Han, R., Wang, Y., et al. (2022) · Frontiers in Molecular Biosciences · doi:10.3389/fmolb.2022.780200 · Cited by 29
“MK-1454, a synthetic CDN which binds directly to STING, showed a safe tolerability profile and encouraging efficacy together with pembrolizumab in a phase I trial (NCT03010176) (Harrington et al., 2018).”
BackgroundHuang, K., Chandra, D., McGrath, S. M., Dixit, V. S., Zhang, C., Wu, J., TenDyke, K., Yao, H., Hukkanen, R. R., Taylor, N., et al. (2022) · Molecular Cancer Therapeutics · doi:10.1158/1535-7163.mct-21-0780 · Cited by 29
Vaccinating against cancer: getting to prime time
Chang, R., Gulley, J. L., & Fong, L. H. (2023) · Journal for ImmunoTherapy of Cancer · doi:10.1136/jitc-2022-006628 · Cited by 28
Liang, J., Jin, X., Deng, X., Huang, Q., Zhang, S., Chen, W., & Zhang, X. (2024) · Materials Today · doi:10.1016/j.mattod.2024.07.004 · Cited by 30
Progress Update on STING Agonists as Vaccine Adjuvants
Shen, Y., Huang, W., Nie, J., & Zhang, L. (2025) · Vaccines · doi:10.3390/vaccines13040371 · Cited by 26
“Despite this agonist being suggested to harbor a boosting effect when co-administered with humanized anti-PD-1 antibody, adverse side effects were still observed, indicating a lack of efficiency [70,73,74].”
Jacoby, J., Mahalingam, D., Alistar, A. T., Garmey, E. G., Kazmi, S. M. A., Mooneyham, T., Sun, L., Yap, T. A., Vu, P., & Moser, J. C. (2025) · Journal for ImmunoTherapy of Cancer · doi:10.1136/jitc-2025-011572 · Cited by 35
Addressing Resistance to Immune Checkpoint Inhibitor Therapy: An Urgent Unmet Need
Hu‐Lieskovan, S., Malouf, G. G., Jacobs, I. A., Chou, J., Liu, L., & Johnson, M. L. (2021) · Future Oncology · doi:10.2217/fon-2020-0967 · Cited by 26
Second messenger 2′3′-cyclic GMP–AMP (2′3′-cGAMP): Synthesis, transmission, and degradation
Su, M., Zheng, J., Gan, L., Zhao, Y., Fu, Y., & Chen, Q. (2022) · Biochemical Pharmacology · doi:10.1016/j.bcp.2022.114934 · Cited by 28
Xie, Z., Lu, L., Wang, Z., Luo, Q., Yang, Y., Fang, T., Chen, Z., Ma, D., Quan, J., & Xi, Z. (2022) · European Journal of Medicinal Chemistry · doi:10.1016/j.ejmech.2022.114796 · Cited by 26
Wu, Y., Diao, P., Peng, Y., Yang, Y., Wang, Y. A., Lv, P., Li, J., Wang, D., Cai, T., & Cheng, J. (2025) · ACS Nano · doi:10.1021/acsnano.5c00322 · Cited by 27
Lipid Nanoparticles Delivering Constitutively Active STING mRNA to Stimulate Antitumor Immunity
Liu, W., Alameh, M., Yang, J. F., Xu, J. R., Lin, P. J. C., Tam, Y. K., Weissman, D., & You, J. (2022) · International Journal of Molecular Sciences · doi:10.3390/ijms232314504 · Cited by 33
“STING agonists are being actively pursued as new cancer immunotherapies [31,36,37,99], but few have generated positive clinical outcomes [34,35].”
BackgroundRevolutionizing adjuvant development: harnessing AI for next-generation cancer vaccines
Zhang, W., Zheng, X., Coghi, P. S., Chen, J.-H., Dong, B.-J., & Fan, X. (2024) · Frontiers in Immunology · doi:10.3389/fimmu.2024.1438030 · Cited by 27
Discovery of VH domains that allosterically inhibit ENPP1
Solomon, P. E., Bracken, C. J., Carozza, J. A., Wang, H., Young, E. P., Wellner, A., Liu, C. C., Sweet-Cordero, A., Li, L., & Wells, J. A. (2023) · Nature Chemical Biology · doi:10.1038/s41589-023-01368-5 · Cited by 28
Innate Immune Activation with Multifunctional Nanoparticles for Cancer Immunotherapy
Jiang, X., & Lin, W. (2025) · Angewandte Chemie International Edition · doi:10.1002/anie.202423280 · Cited by 29
Checkpoints and immunity in cancers: Role of GNG12
Alausa, A. O., Victor, U. C., Fadahunsi, O. S., Owolabi, N., Adeniji, A., Olatinwo, M., Ogunlana, A. T., Olaleke, B., Balogun, T. A., Ogundepo, S., et al. (2022) · Pharmacological Research · doi:10.1016/j.phrs.2022.106242 · Cited by 24
Shan, B., Hou, H., Zhang, K., Li, R., Shen, C., Chen, Z., Xu, P., Cui, R., Su, Z., Zhang, C., et al. (2023) · Journal of Medicinal Chemistry · doi:10.1021/acs.jmedchem.2c01714 · Cited by 30
Wang, Y., Meng, L., Meng, S., Huang, L., Luo, S., Wu, X., & Gong, X. (2023) · Cancer Biology & Therapy · doi:10.1080/15384047.2023.2203332 · Cited by 24
“36 In our study, FLOT1 depletion enhanced the activation of STING pathway by boosting DNA damage and increasing the accumulation of dsDNA in cytoplasm after delivery of radiation, which might compensate for the limitation of the exogenous CDN delivery – low cell permeability and unsatisfied…”
BackgroundThe multiple faces of cGAS-STING in antitumor immunity: prospects and challenges
Zhou, Z., Huang, S., Fan, F., Xu, Y., Moore, C., Li, S., & Han, C. (2024) · Medical Review · doi:10.1515/mr-2023-0061 · Cited by 25
Lee, S., Hong, K. H., Park, H., Ha, J., Lee, S. E., Park, D. J., Jeong, S. D., Kim, S., Kim, D., Ahn, J., et al. (2024) · Journal of Controlled Release · doi:10.1016/j.jconrel.2024.07.004 · Cited by 25
Schrank, B. R., Wang, Y., Wu, A., Tran, N., Lee, D., Edwards, J., Huntoon, K. M., Dong, S., Ha, J., Ma, Y., et al. (2025) · Nature Cancer · doi:10.1038/s43018-025-00919-0 · Cited by 29
Li, Z. Y., Zheng, W., Liu, Y., Cao, R., Wei, J., & Jia, H. (2025) · Journal of Experimental & Clinical Cancer Research · doi:10.1186/s13046-025-03555-9 · Cited by 22
Mazzaschi, G., Leonetti, A., Minari, R., Gnetti, L., Quaini, F., Tiseo, M., & Facchinetti, F. (2021) · Current Treatment Options in Oncology · doi:10.1007/s11864-021-00891-8 · Cited by 21
Goswami, A., Deb, B., Goyal, S., Gosavi, A., Mali, M., Martis, A. M., Khurana, P., Gangar, M., Raykar, D., Mohanty, A., et al. (2022) · Molecules · doi:10.3390/molecules27196721 · Cited by 24
“Although several STING agonists are undergoing pre-clinical and clinical trials, the major drawbacks of available STING agonists include poor pharmacokinetic and physicochemical properties, as well as risks of cytokine release syndrome in the case of systemic administration, thereby largely restricting them to intra-t…”
BackgroundBioactive metallic nanoparticles for synergistic cancer immunotherapy
Wang, L., Lin, D., Li, M., Yu, J., Yang, Y., Wang, H., Chu, H., Ye, J., & Liu, Y. (2025) · Acta Pharmaceutica Sinica B · doi:10.1016/j.apsb.2025.02.022 · Cited by 22
“There are also non-nucleotide STING agonists ( e.g. , MSA-2 226 , MK-1454 227 , and ADU-S100 228 ) and nucleotide-based STING agonists ( e.g. , interferon-stimulated DNA (ISD) 58 , 2 0 -3 0 -cyclic GMP e AMP 229 , cyclic-di-GMP 230 , exo-STING).”
Qu, S., & Dai, H. (2025) · Molecular Therapy — Nucleic Acids · doi:10.1016/j.omtn.2025.102530 · Cited by 22
Targeting the stimulator of interferon genes (STING) in breast cancer
Ying-rui, M., Bu-Fan, B., Deng, L., Rong, S., & Zhou, Q. (2023) · Frontiers in Pharmacology · doi:10.3389/fphar.2023.1199152 · Cited by 18
“Another synthetic STING agonist, MK-1454, demonstrates potent antitumour activity in pre-clinical trials and is currently in clinical development, showing encouraging efficacy (Harrington et al., 2018; Chang W. et al., 2022).”
BackgroundChallenges and Opportunities in Targeting the Complex Pancreatic Tumor Microenvironment
Finan, J. M., Guo, Y., Goodyear, S. M., & Brody, J. R. (2024) · JCO oncology advances. · doi:10.1200/oa-24-00050 · Cited by 21
Self-citationIntralesional Cancer Immunotherapies
Ott, P. A. (2019) · Hematology/Oncology Clinics of North America · doi:10.1016/j.hoc.2018.12.009 · Cited by 19
Dendritic cell immunotherapy advances for solid tumors: Vaccination and modulation
Clayton, G., Toffoli, E. C., de Gruijl, T. D., & van Kooyk, Y. (2025) · Cell Reports Medicine · doi:10.1016/j.xcrm.2025.102412 · Cited by 21
Synergistic combination of oncolytic virotherapy with CAR T-cell therapy
Ajina, A., & Maher, J. F. (2019) · Progress in molecular biology and translational science · doi:10.1016/bs.pmbts.2019.06.015 · Cited by 20
Chemical evolution of cyclic dinucleotides: Perspective of the analogs and their preparation
Wang, Z., & Xi, Z. (2021) · Tetrahedron · doi:10.1016/j.tet.2021.132096 · Cited by 19
Polyvalent design in the cGAS-STING pathway
Bennett, Z. T., Li, S., Sumer, B. D., & Gao, J. (2021) · Seminars in Immunology · doi:10.1016/j.smim.2021.101580 · Cited by 19
The Contemporary Landscape and Future Directions of Intratumoral Immunotherapy
Orama, S. B., & Sheth, R. A. (2023) · Journal of Immunotherapy and Precision Oncology · doi:10.36401/jipo-22-8 · Cited by 17
“STING agonists as anticancer agents have robust preclinical evidence; phase I trials when combined with checkpoint inhibitors resulted in an objective response rate of 24%.([27])”
BackgroundWang, F., Li, X., Swanson, M. D., Guetschow, E. D., Winston, M. S., Smith, J. P., Hoyt, E., Liu, Z., Richardson, D. D., Bu, X., et al. (2022) · Biotechnology and Bioengineering · doi:10.1002/bit.28112 · Cited by 17
“…to pose a significant immunogenicity risk due to their low abundance level (<20 ng/mg in API for those with high in silico risk) and the low dose of MK‐1454 (10–3000 µg; Harrington et al., 2018), these materials have not been assessed for immunotoxicity in animal studies or clinical trials.”
BackgroundMethodcGAS-STING pathway targeted therapies and their applications in the treatment of high-grade glioma
Tripathi, S., Najem, H., Mahajan, A., Zhang, P., Low, J., Stegh, A. H., Curran, M. A., Ashley, D. M., James, C. D., & Heimberger, A. B. (2022) · F1000Research · doi:10.12688/f1000research.125163.1 · Cited by 16
“Results from the use ofMK-1454 were initially reported at the European Society ofMedical Oncology Meeting in 2018 (NCT03010176).(60) Treatment related adverse events occurred in 83% of monotherapy patients as well as 82% of STING agonist plus anti-PD-1 therapy treated patients.”
MethodDowling, J. P., Nikitin, P. A., Shen, F., Shukla, H., Finn, J. P., Patel, N. B., Swider, C. R., Bingaman, J. L., Nicolescu, C., Sikorski, E. L., et al. (2023) · mAbs · doi:10.1080/19420862.2023.2212673 · Cited by 16
O’Meara, C. H., Jafri, Z., & Khachigian, L. M. (2023) · International Journal of Molecular Sciences · doi:10.3390/ijms241411695 · Cited by 18
“STING MK-1454 1 NCT03010176 [82] Combination MK-1454 (ulveostinag) + pembrilizumab vs.”
Laursen, M. F., Kofod‐Olsen, E., & Agger, R. (2019) · Cancer Immunology Immunotherapy · doi:10.1007/s00262-019-02400-1 · Cited by 15
Niu, J., Bai, H., Li, Z., Gao, Y., Zhang, Y., Wang, X., Yang, Y., Xu, Y., Geng, M., Xie, Z., et al. (2022) · European Journal of Medicinal Chemistry · doi:10.1016/j.ejmech.2022.114482 · Cited by 15
STING‐Activating Small Molecular Therapeutics for Cancer Immunotherapy
Huang, C., Tong, T., Ren, L., & Wang, H. (2024) · ChemBioChem · doi:10.1002/cbic.202400255 · Cited by 15
Soh, L.-J., Lee, S.-Y., Roebuck, M. M., & Wong, P. (2024) · Life Sciences · doi:10.1016/j.lfs.2024.123112 · Cited by 15
Ascierto, P. A., Agarwala, S. S., Botti, G., Budillon, A., Davies, M. A., Dummer, R., Ernstoff, M. S., Ferrone, S., Formenti, S. C., Gajewski, T. F., et al. (2019) · Journal of Translational Medicine · doi:10.1186/s12967-019-1979-z · Cited by 15
“In a phase 1 study, MK-1454 in combination with pembrolizumab had encouraging efficacy and an acceptable safety profile in patients with advanced solid tumors or lymphoma [57].”
BackgroundIntratumoural immunotherapy: activation of nucleic acid sensing pattern recognition receptors
Agrawal, S., & Kandimalla, E. R. (2019) · Immuno-Oncology Technology · doi:10.1016/j.iotech.2019.10.001 · Cited by 16
Understanding genetic determinants of resistance to immune checkpoint blockers
Aspeslagh, S., Chabanon, R. M., Champiat, S., & Postel-Vinay, S. C. (2019) · Seminars in Cancer Biology · doi:10.1016/j.semcancer.2019.12.020 · Cited by 16
Kanoda, R., Nakajima, S., Fukai, S., Saito, M., Saito, K., Suzuki, H., Kikuchi, T., Nirei, A., Okayama, H., Mimura, K., et al. (2024) · Scientific Reports · doi:10.1038/s41598-024-71974-3 · Cited by 15
“Furthermore, a combination therapy using MK-1454 and anti-PD-1 antibody showed a 24% response rate with reductions in the size of both target-injected and noninjected lesions (83% median) in advanced solid tumors 27 .”
Inhibitory Microenvironment Remodeling Enhances STING Activation for Solid Tumor Immunotherapy
Fang, W., Chen, L., Hu, P., & Shi, J. (2025) · Advanced Functional Materials · doi:10.1002/adfm.202421849 · Cited by 13
Li, D., & Rudloff, U. (2025) · Expert Opinion on Emerging Drugs · doi:10.1080/14728214.2025.2504376 · Cited by 15
Jones, D. C., Irving, L. M., Dudley, R., Blümli, S., Wolny, M., Chatzopoulou, E. I., Pryts, S., Ahuja, S., Rees, D. G., Sandercock, A. M., et al. (2025) · Journal for ImmunoTherapy of Cancer · doi:10.1136/jitc-2024-010012 · Cited by 15
Wang, J., Xiao, Y., Loupakis, F., Stintzing, S., Yang, Y., Arai, H., Battaglin, F., Kawanishi, N. K., Jayachandran, P., Soni, S., et al. (2022) · European Journal of Cancer · doi:10.1016/j.ejca.2022.05.016 · Cited by 13
Guo, Z., Liu, T., Gao, Q., Wang, C., Wang, Q., Du, R., Liu, Y., Li, H., Huang, Y., Liu, Y., et al. (2025) · Molecular Pharmaceutics · doi:10.1021/acs.molpharmaceut.5c01263 · Cited by 12
Elmetwalli, A. (2025) · Drug Resistance Updates · doi:10.1016/j.drup.2025.101326 · Cited by 16
AND logic nanoparticle for precision immunotherapy of metastatic cancers
Ye, S., Chen, S., Basava, V. S., Torres, K., Zhao, Y., Huang, G., Chen, M., & Gao, J. (2026) · Nature Nanotechnology · doi:10.1038/s41565-026-02130-3 · Cited by 18
“Early clinical trials of small-molecule STING agonists (for example, Adu-S100 and MK-1454) have shown moderate clinical response but significant patient morbidities (grade 3/4 adverse effects) 11,12 .”
Corke, L., & Sacher, A. G. (2021) · Current Oncology · doi:10.3390/curroncol29010004 · Cited by 15
“Another intratumoral STING agonist MK-1454 had minimal response when used as monotherapy in patients with advanced solid tumors, but 24% in combination with pembrolizumab [58].”
BackgroundSTING Agonists in Head and Neck Squamous Cell Carcinoma
Wallington, D. G., Contessa, J. N., & Hayman, T. J. (2022) · The Cancer Journal · doi:10.1097/ppo.0000000000000620 · Cited by 12
Nanomaterials Application for STING Pathway-Based Tumor Immunotherapy
Zhao, W., Tang, X., Qin, Y., Wang, X., Zhong, K., Gong, N., & Li, T. (2025) · International Journal of Nanomedicine · doi:10.2147/ijn.s535460 · Cited by 11
Harnessing cGAS‐STING Pathway for Cancer Immunotherapy: From Bench to Clinic
Lee, D., Huntoon, K. M., Kang, M., Lü, Y., Gallup, T. D., Jiang, W., & Kim, B. Y. S. (2022) · Advanced Therapeutics · doi:10.1002/adtp.202200040 · Cited by 10
Lu, Y., Li, Z., Zhu, X., Zeng, Q., Liu, S., & Guan, W. (2025) · International Journal of Nanomedicine · doi:10.2147/ijn.s503780 · Cited by 11
“55,101 In the bargain, combining with other treatment modalities or being the payload agents for novel delivery systems provides new ideas for CDN drugs to activate the STING pathway and related cancer immunotherapy.”
Potential role of cGAS/STING pathway in regulating cancer progression
Dhanisha, S. S., & Guruvayoorappan, C. (2022) · Critical Reviews in Oncology/Hematology · doi:10.1016/j.critrevonc.2022.103780 · Cited by 11
Mărcuț, L. F., Brata, R. D., Barb, A. C., Manole, A., Stef, D. G., Dumitru, C. Ș., Zara, F., & Pătrașcu, R. (2025) · International Journal of Molecular Sciences · doi:10.3390/ijms262311271 · Cited by 11
“First-generation cyclic dinucleotides (CDNs) such as ADU-S100 (MIW815) [141] and MK-1454 [142] demonstrated potent local interferon induction but suffered from poor bioavailability and dose-limiting inflammation in phase I trials.”
Nanoparticle targeting cGAS-STING signaling in disease therapy
Zhou, L., Huang, Y., Wu, Y., & Tang, S. (2024) · Nano Research · doi:10.1007/s12274-024-6714-x · Cited by 11
Nelson, B. E., Naing, A., Fu, S., Sheth, R. A., Murthy, R., & Piha-Paul, S. A. (2024) · Immuno-Oncology Technology · doi:10.1016/j.iotech.2024.101040 · Cited by 10
Keenan, B. P., Loon, K. V., Khilnani, A. D., Fidelman, N. A., Behr, S. C., Atreya, C. E., & Oh, D. Y. (2021) · Anticancer Research · doi:10.21873/anticanres.15080 · Cited by 10
Self-citationFan, Y., Dong, Z., Wu, Y., & Wen, H. (2025) · Frontiers in Immunology · doi:10.3389/fimmu.2025.1692365 · Cited by 10
Alnukhali, M., Altabbakh, O., Farooqı, A. A., Pollack, A. S., Daunert, S., Deo, S. K., & Tao, W. (2024) · Current Medicinal Chemistry · doi:10.2174/0109298673273303231208071403 · Cited by 9
Small molecule innate immune modulators in cancer therapy
Goswami, A., Goyal, S., Khurana, P., Singh, K., Deb, B., & Kulkarni, A. (2024) · Frontiers in Immunology · doi:10.3389/fimmu.2024.1395655 · Cited by 10
Kobayashi, Y., Bustos, M. A., Hayashi, Y., Yu, Q., & Hoon, D. S. �. (2024) · Journal for ImmunoTherapy of Cancer · doi:10.1136/jitc-2024-009590 · Cited by 9
Leal, J. L., & John, T. (2022) · Clinical Lung Cancer · doi:10.1016/j.cllc.2022.08.009 · Cited by 9
Type I interferons: One stone to concurrently kill two birds, viral infections and cancers
Kumar, A., Khani, A. T., & Swaminathan, S. (2021) · Current Research in Virological Science · doi:10.1016/j.crviro.2021.100014 · Cited by 9
Niu, N., Li, K., Wang, J.-K., et al. (2025) · Biomarker Research · doi:10.1186/s40364-024-00721-7 · Cited by 8
“MK-1454, a synthetic CDN, was tested as monotherapy or in combination with anti-PD-1 antibody (α-PD-1) pembrolizumab for the treatment of advanced solid tumors (NCT03010176, NCT04220866) [15].”
Chen, Q., Yu, H., Li, N., Zhang, H., Tan, M., Liu, W., Zheng, M., Hu, Y., Cheng, L., Chen, Y., et al. (2025) · Journal of Nanobiotechnology · doi:10.1186/s12951-025-03536-2 · Cited by 9
“However, the clinical application of STING agonists is hindered by their poor metabolic and circulatory stability, low cellular uptake efficiency, and insufficient efficacy, which collectively limit their effective intracellular delivery [11, 12].”
Gong, X., Zhou, Y., & Deng, Y. (2025) · Current Oncology · doi:10.3390/curroncol32070367 · Cited by 11
“Additionally, Wang et al. suggested that inhibiting FLOT1 in combination with STING agonists, which promote both innate and adaptive immunity, could potentially rescue the suboptimal effects of STING agonist monotherapy [32,35].”
Xu, T., Dai, J., Tang, L., Sun, L., Si, L., & Guo, J. (2023) · Cancer Immunology Immunotherapy · doi:10.1007/s00262-023-03502-7 · Cited by 10
“In 2018, it was reported that single-agent treatment with MK-1454 did not achieve a partial or complete response in patients with advanced solid tumors or lymphomas, and the objective response rate of MK-1454 plus anti-PD-1 antibody Keytruda was less than 30% [46].”
BackgroundEngaging Pattern Recognition Receptors in Solid Tumors to Generate Systemic Antitumor Immunity
Brown, M. C. (2022) · Cancer treatment and research · doi:10.1007/978-3-030-96376-7_3 · Cited by 8
Next-Generation Immunotherapy Approaches in Melanoma
Buchanan, T., Amouzegar, A., & Luke, J. J. (2021) · Current Oncology Reports · doi:10.1007/s11912-021-01104-z · Cited by 9
Liu, W., Alameh, M., Yang, J. F., Xu, J. R., Lin, P. J. C., Tam, Y. K., Weissman, D., & You, J. (2022) · bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) · doi:10.1101/2022.01.08.475499 · Cited by 8
“However, clinical trials of these STING agonists did not show beneficial results [39,40].”
BackgroundZhao, H., Tao, J., Zhang, L., Li, Q., He, M., Wen, B., Liu, Z., Myatt, H., & Sun, D. (2025) · Journal of Medicinal Chemistry · doi:10.1021/acs.jmedchem.5c00296 · Cited by 9
Xia, R., Liang, J., Ma, J., Du, X., Ma, L., Han, X., Wang, Y., Qin, J., & Yan, L. (2025) · Frontiers in Oncology · doi:10.3389/fonc.2025.1618903 · Cited by 7
Novel targeted therapies and immunological strategies for breast cancer treatment
Mussa, A., Hamid, M. A. M., Talib, M., Ehinnou, I. B., Bragoli, A. J., Hajissa, K., Mokhtar, N. F., Mohamud, R., Al-Hatamleh, M. A. I., & Hassan, R. (2026) · Biochemical Pharmacology · doi:10.1016/j.bcp.2026.117929 · Cited by 10
If Virchow and Ehrlich Had Dreamt Together: What the Future Holds for KRAS-Mutant Lung Cancer
Köhler, J., & Janne, P. A. (2021) · International Journal of Molecular Sciences · doi:10.3390/ijms22063025 · Cited by 7
“Other strategies to boost the immune response against KRAS-mutant cancers include STING agonists (ADU-S100, MK-1454) [101,144,145], as well as CAR-T cells (adoptive T-cell transfer) [146] and mRNA vaccine technology [147].”
BackgroundO’Meara, C. H., Nguyen, T. V., Jafri, Z., Boyer, M. J., Shonka, D. C., & Khachigian, L. M. (2023) · Nanomaterials · doi:10.3390/nano14010006 · Cited by 8
Sun, X., Yu, X., Zhao, Y., Xing, L., Na, L., Chen, Z., Xiao, Z., Dai, H., Yu, J., Long, S., et al. (2022) · European Journal of Medicinal Chemistry · doi:10.1016/j.ejmech.2022.115053 · Cited by 8
Novel immune‐modulating drugs for advanced head and neck cancer
Chen, T.-H., Chang, P. M., & Yang, M. (2019) · Head & Neck · doi:10.1002/hed.25929 · Cited by 8
“Twenty-five patients were enrolled in the MK-1454/pembrolizumab combination group; there were no CRs, but 6 of 25 patients achieved a PR, and 6 had SD.(17) Both injected tumors and other metastatic tumors showed regression in responders, with a median 83% reduction in tumor size.”
BackgroundInfluential
Metadata
- Authors
- Harrington, K. J., Brody, J., Ingham, M., Strauss, J., Cemerski, S., Wang, M., Tse, A., Khilnani, A., Marabelle, A., & Golan, T.
- Affiliations
- Institute of Cancer Research (GB)
- Mount Sinai Hospital (US)
- Columbia University Irving Medical Center (US)
- Mary Crowley Cancer Research Center (US)
- Merck & Co., Inc., Rahway, NJ, USA (United States) (US)
- Institut Gustave Roussy (FR)
- Sheba Medical Center (IL)
- Venue
- Annals of Oncology
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2018-10
- Volume
- 29
- Pages
- viii712
- ISSN
- 0923-7534 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2898106814
- Cited by
- 280
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 34 · 2025: 50 · 2024: 37 · 2023: 28 · 2022: 42 · 2021: 50 · 2020: 18 · 2019: 20
- FWCI
- 9.57
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
- doi.org
- Licence
- Locations
- Annals of Oncology (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- Amgen
- Pfizer
- AstraZeneca
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Immunology and Microbiology › Immunology › interferon and immune responses
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Oncology › Cancer Immunotherapy and Biomarkers
- Life Sciences › Immunology and Microbiology › Immunology › Immunotherapy and Immune Responses
- Keywords
- STING agonist, cyclic dinucleotides, pembrolizumab, immune checkpoint inhibitor combination, advanced solid tumors, lymphoma, antitumor immunity, intratumoral administration
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review