Severe immune-related adverse events are common with sequential PD-(L)1 blockade and osimertinib
Open accessAbstract
Background Concurrent programmed death-ligand-1 (PD-(L)1) plus osimertinib is associated with severe immune related adverse events (irAE) in epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR)-mutant non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Now that PD-(L)1 inhibitors are routinely used as adjuvant and first-line treatments, sequential PD-(L)1 inhibition followed by osimertinib use may become more frequent and have unforeseen serious toxicity.Methods We identified patients with EGFR-mutant NSCLC who were treated with PD-(L)1 blockade and EGFR- tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs), irrespective of drug or sequence of administration (total n = 126). Patient records were reviewed to identify severe (NCI-CTCAE v5.0 grades 3-4) toxicity.Results Fifteen percent [6 of 41, 95% confidence interval (CI) 7% to 29%] of all patients treated with sequential PD-(L)1 blockade followed later by osimertinib developed a severe irAE. Severe irAEs were most common among those who began osimertinib within 3 months of prior PD-(L)1 blockade (5 of 21, 24%, 95% CI 10% to 45%), as compared with >3-12 months (1 of 8, 13%, 95% CI 0% to 50%), >12 months (0 of 12, 0%, 95% CI 0% to 28%). By contrast, no severe irAEs were identified among patients treated with osimertinib followed by PD-(L)1 (0 of 29, 95% CI 0% to 14%) or PD-(L)1 followed by other EGFR-TKIs (afatinib or erlotinib, 0 of 27, 95% CI 0% to 15%). IrAEs occurred at a median onset of 20 days after osimertinib (range 14-167 days). All patients with irAEs required steroids and most required hospitalization.Conclusion PD-(L)1 blockade followed by osimertinib is associated with severe irAE and is most frequent among patients who recently received PD-(L)1 blockade. No irAEs were observed when osimertinib preceded PD-(L)1 blockade or when PD-(L)1 was followed by other EGFR-TKIs. This association appears to be specific to osimertinib, as no severe irAEs occurred with administration of other EGFR-TKIs.
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The sequence-dependent irAE phenomenon appears to be unique to osimertinib.
“This phenomenon appears to be unique to osimertinib [194].”
From Combination strategies with PD-1/PD-L1 blockade: current advances and future directions (2022) · cites this paper as [194]
Treatment sequence and timing are closely associated with the incidence of irAE.
“it has been confirmed that treatment sequence and timing are closely associated with the incidence of irAE.”
From Combination strategies with PD-1/PD-L1 blockade: current advances and future directions (2022) · cites this paper as [194]
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 14 · Cited by 406
- Authors
- Schoenfeld, A. J., Arbour, K. C., Rizvi, H., Iqbal, A. N., Gadgeel, S. M., Girshman, J., Kris, M. G., Riely, G. J., Yu, H. A., & Hellmann, M. D.
- Affiliations
- Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center (US)
- University of Michigan (US)
- Corresponding author
- Yu, H.A.
- Hellmann, M.D.
- ORCID
- Venue
- Annals of Oncology
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2019-05
- Volume
- 30
- Issue
- 5
- Pages
- 839-844
- ISSN
- 0923-7534 (ISSN-L)
- PMC
- PMC7360149
- OpenAlex
- W2922107046
- Cited by
- 406
- References
- 14
- Citations by year
- 2026: 25 · 2025: 51 · 2024: 73 · 2023: 65 · 2022: 65 · 2021: 69 · 2020: 44 · 2019: 14
- FWCI
- 20.06
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
- doi.org
- Licence
- Locations
- Annals of Oncology (publishedVersion)
- PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center Support Grant/Core Grant (P30 CA008748)
- Druckenmiller Center for Lung Cancer Research at MSKCC
- MDH
- Damon Runyon Cancer Research Foundation (CI-98-18)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Oncology › Cancer Immunotherapy and Biomarkers
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine › Lung Cancer Treatments and Mutations
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine › Lung Cancer Diagnosis and Treatment
- Keywords
- immune-related adverse events, PD-L1 blockade, osimertinib, EGFR-mutant non-small cell lung cancer, drug toxicity, corticosteroid therapy, treatment sequencing, EGFR tyrosine kinase inhibitors, afatinib, erlotinib, immune checkpoint inhibitors, hospitalization
- MeSH terms
- Antineoplastic Agents, Immunological, Nivolumab, Acrylamides, Adult, Aged, Aged, 80 and over, Aniline Compounds, Carcinoma, Non-Small-Cell Lung, Female, Humans, Indoles, Lung Neoplasms, Male, Middle Aged, Pneumonia, Pyrimidines, Retrospective Studies, Disease-Free Survival, Protein Kinase Inhibitors, Young Adult, B7-H1 Antigen, Antibodies, Monoclonal, Humanized, ErbB Receptors
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review