Regulation of photosynthesis of C3 plants in response to progressive drought: stomatal conductance as a reference parameter.
Open accessAbstract
We review the photosynthetic responses to drought in field-grown grapevines and other species. As in other plant species, the relationship between photosynthesis and leaf water potential and/or relative water content in field-grown grapevines depends on conditions during plant growth and measurements. However, when light-saturated stomatal conductance was used as the reference parameter to reflect drought intensity, a common response pattern was observed that was much less dependent on the species and conditions. Many photosynthetic parameters (e.g. electron transport rate, carboxylation efficiency, intrinsic water-use efficiency, respiration rate in the light, etc.) were also more strongly correlated with stomatal conductance than with water status itself. Moreover, steady-state chlorophyll fluorescence also showed a high dependency on stomatal conductance. This is discussed in terms of an integrated down-regulation of the whole photosynthetic process by CO2 availability in the mesophyll. A study with six Mediterranean shrubs revealed that, in spite of some marked interspecific differences, all followed the same pattern of dependence of photosynthetic processes on stomatal conductance, and this pattern was quite similar to that of grapevines. Further analysis of the available literature suggests that the above-mentioned pattern is general for C3 plants. Even though the patterns described do not necessarily imply a cause and effect relationship, they can help our understanding of the apparent contradictions concerning stomatal vs. non-stomatal limitations to photosynthesis under drought. The significance of these findings for the improvement of water-use efficiency of crops is discussed.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Plants were considered under water deficit when stomatal conductance (gs) was decreased by 40% compared to well-watered plants, and gs was considered a good indicator of water deficit status.
“Plants were considered to be under WD when gs was decreased by 40% compared to the well-watered plants; gs was considered as a good indicator of the WD status, as previously demonstrated (Medrano et al., 2002).”
From Rubisco and Rubisco Activase Play an Important Role in the Biochemical Limitations of Photosynthesis in Rice, Wheat, and Maize under High Temperature and Water Deficit (2017) · cites this paper as Medrano et al., 2002
The increase in the ratio of electron transport rate to gross CO2 assimilation rate under water deficit indicates an increase in photorespiration under water deficit conditions.
“This behavior is agreement with reports from literature in a large number of species (Flexas and Medrano, 2002b; Medrano et al., 2002; Salazar-Parra et al., 2012) indicating an increase in photorespiration under WD conditions.”
From Rubisco and Rubisco Activase Play an Important Role in the Biochemical Limitations of Photosynthesis in Rice, Wheat, and Maize under High Temperature and Water Deficit (2017) · cites this paper as Medrano et al., 2002
Cites
Flexas, J., Bota, J., Escalona, J. M., Sampol, B., & Medrano, H. (2002) · Australian Journal of Plant Physiology · doi:10.1071/pp01119 · Cited by 701 · see citing works
Self-citationGunasekera, D., & Berkowitz, G. A. (1993) · Plant Physiology · doi:10.1104/pp.103.2.629 · Cited by 76 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Photosynthesis under stressful environments: An overview
Ashraf, M., & Harris, P. J. C. (2013) · Photosynthetica · doi:10.1007/s11099-013-0021-6 · Cited by 2,028 · see citing works
GRASSI, G., & MAGNANI, F. (2005) · Plant, Cell & Environment · doi:10.1111/j.1365-3040.2005.01333.x · Cited by 820 · see citing works
Flexas, J., Bota, J., Escalona, J. M., Sampol, B., & Medrano, H. (2002) · Australian Journal of Plant Physiology · doi:10.1071/pp01119 · Cited by 701 · see citing works
Self-citationPerdomo, J. A., Capó-Bauçà, S., Carmo-Silva, E., & Galmés, J. (2017) · Frontiers in Plant Science · doi:10.3389/fpls.2017.00490 · Cited by 364 · see citing works
Pepe, M., Crescente, M. F., & Varone, L. (2022) · Plants · doi:10.3390/plants11070899 · Cited by 42 · see citing works
- Authors
- MEDRANO, H.
- Affiliations
- Mediterranean Institute for Advanced Studies (ES)
- Corresponding author
- MEDRANO, H.
- ORCID
- MEDRANO, H.
- Venue
- Annals of Botany
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 2002-06-15
- Volume
- 89
- Issue
- 7
- Pages
- 895-905
- ISSN
- 0305-7364 (ISSN-L)
- 1095-8290
- PMC
- PMC4233802
- OpenAlex
- W1513629489
- Cited by
- 1,021
- References
- 2
- Citations by year
- 2026: 36 · 2025: 58 · 2024: 45 · 2023: 47 · 2022: 74 · 2021: 68 · 2020: 69 · 2019: 71 · 2018: 52 · 2017: 44 · 2016: 59 · 2015: 55 · 2014: 54 · 2013: 41 · 2012: 43
- FWCI
- 15.34
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
- Locations
- Annals of Botany (publishedVersion)
- Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion)
- PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- DIGITAL.CSIC (Spanish National Research Council (CSIC)) (submittedVersion)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Global and Planetary Change › Plant Water Relations and Carbon Dynamics
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Photosynthetic Processes and Mechanisms
- Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Plant Science › Plant Stress Responses and Tolerance
- Keywords
- drought stress, photosynthesis, C3 plants, stomatal conductance, grapevine, leaf water potential, relative water content, water use efficiency, electron transport rate, carboxylation efficiency, chlorophyll fluorescence, stomatal limitation, non-stomatal limitation, Mediterranean shrubs
- MeSH terms
- Biological Transport, Carbon Dioxide, Chlorophyll, Disasters, Electron Transport, Environment, Light, Models, Biological, Photosynthesis, Plants, Water, Plant Structures, Vitis
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review