Cited by 477Photosynthetic Processes and MechanismsPlant Stress Responses and TolerancePlant Water Relations and Carbon Dynamics

Rubisco activity: effects of drought stress.

Open access
PARRY, M. A. J.·2002·Annals of Botany

Abstract

Ribulose-1,5-bisphosphate carboxylase/oxygenase (Rubisco) activity is modulated in vivo either by reaction with CO2 and Mg2+ to carbamylate a lysine residue in the catalytic site, or by the binding of inhibitors within the catalytic site. Binding of inhibitors blocks either activity or the carbamylation of the lysine residue that is essential for activity. At night, in many species, 2-carboxyarabinitol-1-phosphate (CA1P) is formed which binds tightly to Rubisco, inhibiting catalytic activity. Recent work has shown that tight-binding inhibitors can also decrease Rubisco activity in the light and contribute to the regulation of Rubisco activity. Here we determine the influence that such inhibitors of Rubisco exert on catalytic activity during drought stress. In tobacco plants, 'total Rubisco activity', i.e. the activity following pre-incubation with CO2 and Mg2+, was positively correlated with leaf relative water content. However, 'total Rubisco activity' in extracts from leaves with low water potential increased markedly when tightly bound inhibitors were removed, thus increasing the number of catalytic sites available. This suggests that in tobacco the decrease of Rubisco activity under drought stress is not primarily the result of changes in activation by CO2 and Mg2+ but due rather to the presence of tight-binding inhibitors. The amounts of inhibitor present in leaves of droughted tobacco based on the decrease in Rubisco activity per mg soluble protein were usually much greater than the amounts of the known inhibitors (CA1P and 'daytime inhibitor') that can be recovered in acid extracts. Alternative explanations for the difference between maximal and total activities are discussed.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1093/aob/mcf103

Cites

3 of 3 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
PARRY, M. A. J.
Affiliations
Rothamsted Research (GB)
Corresponding author
PARRY, M. A. J.
Venue
Annals of Botany
Published
2002-06-15
Volume
89
Issue
7
Pages
833-839
ISSN
  • 0305-7364 (ISSN-L)
  • 1095-8290
OpenAlex
W2135286033
Cited by
477
References
3
Citations by year
2026: 11 · 2025: 15 · 2024: 17 · 2023: 21 · 2022: 28 · 2021: 24 · 2020: 25 · 2019: 30 · 2018: 23 · 2017: 22 · 2016: 19 · 2015: 24 · 2014: 25 · 2013: 28 · 2012: 25
FWCI
3.95
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Annals of Botany (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Lancaster EPrints (Lancaster University) (submittedVersion)
  • Rothamsted Repository (Rothamsted Repository) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Photosynthetic Processes and Mechanisms
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Plant Science › Plant Stress Responses and Tolerance
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Global and Planetary Change › Plant Water Relations and Carbon Dynamics
Keywords
Rubisco activity, drought stress, tight-binding inhibitors, carbamoylation, Rubisco activation, leaf relative water content, water potential, tobacco, photosynthesis regulation
MeSH terms
Carbon Dioxide, Chlorophyll, Disasters, Magnesium, Osmotic Pressure, Pentosephosphates, Ribulose-Bisphosphate Carboxylase, Stress, Mechanical, Nicotiana, Water, Triticum, Plant Leaves

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review