The DOI matches its Crossref record.
A Modern Tool for Classical Plant Growth Analysis
Open accessAbstract
We present an all‐inclusive software tool for dealing with the essential core of mathematical and statistical calculations in plant growth analysis. The tool calculates up to six of the most fundamental growth parameters according to a purely ‘classical’ approach across one harvest‐interval. All of the estimates carry standard errors and 95 % confidence limits. The tool is written in Microsoft® Excel 2000 and is available free of charge for use in teaching and research from supplementary data.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Rooting depth and soil moisture control Mediterranean woody seedling survival during drought
PADILLA, F. M., & PUGNAIRE, F. I. (2007) · Functional Ecology · doi:10.1111/j.1365-2435.2007.01267.x · Cited by 549
Park, Y., & Runkle, E. S. (2017) · Environmental and Experimental Botany · doi:10.1016/j.envexpbot.2016.12.013 · Cited by 292
Increasing leaf sizes of the vine Epipremnum aureum (Araceae): photosynthesis and respiration
Brito, C., Mantuano, D., De Toni, K. L. G., & Mantovani, A. (2025) · PeerJ · doi:10.7717/peerj.19214 · Cited by 4
Metadata
- Authors
- HUNT, R., CAUSTON, D. R., SHIPLEY, B., & ASKEW, A. P.
- Venue
- Annals of Botany
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 2002-10-01
- Volume
- 90
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 485-488
- ISSN
- 0305-7364 (ISSN-L)
- 1095-8290
- OpenAlex
- W2019183057
- Cited by
- 528
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 5.72
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: A Modern Tool for Classical Plant Growth Analysis. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1093/aob/mcf214
- The paper
- HUNT, R., CAUSTON, D. R., SHIPLEY, B., & ASKEW, A. P. (2002). A Modern Tool for Classical Plant Growth Analysis. Annals of Botany. https://doi.org/10.1093/aob/mcf214
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
