Responses of Photosynthesis, Chlorophyll Fluorescence and ROS-Scavenging Systems to Salt Stress During Seedling and Reproductive Stages in Rice
Open accessAbstract
BACKGROUND AND AIMS: Salinity is a widespread soil problem limiting productivity of cereal crops worldwide. Rice is particularly sensitive to salt stress during the seedling stage, with consequent poor crop establishment, as well as during reproduction where salinity can severely disrupt grain formation and yield. Tolerance at the seedling stage is weakly associated with tolerance during reproduction. Physiological responses to salinity were evaluated for contrasting genotypes, during the seedling and reproductive stages. METHODS: Three rice genotypes differing in their tolerance of salinity were evaluated in a set of greenhouse experiments under salt stress during both seedling stage and reproduction. KEY RESULTS: Photosynthetic CO2 fixation, stomatal conductance (gs) and transpiration decreased substantially because of salt stress, but with greater reduction in the sensitive cultivar IR29. The tolerant lines IR651 and IR632 had more responsive stomata that tended to close faster during the first few hours of stress, followed by partial recovery after a brief period of acclimation. However, in the sensitive line, gs continued to decrease for longer duration and with no recovery afterward. Chlorophyll fluorescence measurements revealed that non-photochemical quenching increased, whereas the electron transport rate decreased under salt stress. Salt-tolerant cultivars exhibited much lower lipid peroxidation, maintained elevated levels of reduced ascorbic acid and showed increased activities of the enzymes involved in the reactive oxygen scavenging system during both developmental stages. CONCLUSIONS: Upregulation of the anti-oxidant system appears to play a role in salt tolerance of rice, with tolerant genotypes also maintaining relatively higher photosynthetic function; during both the vegetative and reproductive stages.
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Photosynthetic capacity has a positive association with biomass production or seed yield in plants under saline stress, including several crops and grass species.
“It is evident that photosynthetic capacity has a positive association with a biomass production or a seed yield in plants under saline stress, including the crops, Triticum aestivum (James et al. 2002), Oryza sativa (Moradi and Ismail 2007), Phaseolus vulgaris (Seemann and Critchley 1985), Zea mays (Crosbie and Pearce 1982), Vigna mungo (Chandra Babu et al. 1985), Gossypium hirsutum (Pettigrew and”
From Photosynthesis under stressful environments: An overview (2013) · cites this paper as Moradi and Ismail 2007
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Cites
Rapid determination of free proline for water-stress studies
Bates, L. S., Waldren, R. P., & Teare, I. D. (1973) · Plant and Soil · doi:10.1007/bf00018060 · Cited by 20,967 · see citing works
Hydrogen Peroxide is Scavenged by Ascorbate-specific Peroxidase in Spinach Chloroplasts
Nakano, Y., & Asada, K. (1981) · Plant and Cell Physiology · doi:10.1093/oxfordjournals.pcp.a076232 · Cited by 10,809 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Research works printed but not linked: 18
- Asada K. 1999. The water-water cycle in chloroplasts: scavenging of active oxygens and dissipation of excess photons. Annual Review of Plant Physiology and Plant Molecular Biology 50: 601-639.
- Asada K, Urano M, Takahashi M. 1973. Subcellular location of super- oxide dismutase in spinach leaves and preparation and properties of crystalline spinach superoxide dismutase. European Journal of Biochemistry 36: 257-266.
- Bhumbla DR, Abrol IP. 1978. Saline and sodic soils. In: Soils and Rice; Proceedings of the IRRI Symposium on Soils and Rice. International Rice Research Institute, Manila, Philippines, 719-738.
- Dionisio-Sese ML, Tobita S. 2000. Effects of salinity on sodium content and photosynthetic responses of rice seedlings differing in salt toler- ance. Journal of Plant Physiology 157: 54-58.
- Fedoroff N. 2006. Redox regulatory mechanisms in cellular stress responses. Annals of Botany 98: 289 -300.
- Gregorio GB, Senadhira D, Mendoza RD. 1997. Screening rice for salinity tolerance. International Rice Research Institute discussion paper series No. 22. Hasegawa PM, Bressan R, Zhu J-K, Bohnert H. 2000. Plant cellular and molecular responses to high salinity. Annual Review of Plant Physiology and Plant Molecular Biology 51: 463-499.
- Maxwell K, Johnson GN. 2000. Chlorophyll fluorescence: a practical guide. Journal of Experimental Botany 51: 659-668.
- Moradi F, Ismail AM, Gregorio GB, Egdane JA. 2003. Salinity toler- ance of rice during reproductive development and association with tolerance at the seedling stage. Indian Journal of Plant Physiology 8: 276-287.
- Munns R, James RA, La ¨uchli A. 2006. Approaches to increasing the salt tolerance of wheat and other cereals. Journal of Experimental Botany 57: 1025-1043.
- Noctor G, Foyer CH. 1998. Ascorbate and glutathione: keeping active oxygen under control. Annual Review of Plant Physiology and Plant Molecular Biology 49: 249-279.
- Orcutt DM, Nilsen ET. 2000. Salinity. In: Physiology of plants under stress, soil and biotic factors. John Wiley & Sons, 177 -237.
- Pearson GA, Bernstein L. 1959. Salinity effects at several growth stages of rice. Agronomy Journal 51: 654-657.
- Shalata A, Neumann PM. 2001. Exogenous ascorbic acid (vitamin C) increases resistance to salt stress and reduces lipid peroxidation. Journal of Experimental Botany 52: 2207-2211.
- Shani U, Ben-Gal A. 2005. Long-term response of grapevines to salinity: osmotic effects and ion toxicity. American Journal of Enology and Viticulture 56: 148-154.
- Tirol-Padre A, Ladha JK. 2004. Assessing the reliability of permanganate-oxidizable carbon as an index of soil labile carbon. Soil Science Society of America Journal 68: 969-978.
- Wolucka BA, Goossens A, Inze D. 2005. Methyl jasmonate stimulates the de novo biosynthesis of vitamin C in plant cell suspensions. Journal of Experimental Botany 56: 2527-2538.
- Yeo AR, Flowers T. 1986. Salinity resistance in rice (Oryza sativa L.) and a pyramiding approach to breeding varieties for saline soils. Australian Journal of Plant Physiology 13: 161-173.
- Yeo AR, Capon SJM, Flowers TJ. 1985. The effect of salinity upon photosynthesis in rice (Oryza sativa L.): gas exchange by individual leaves in relation to their salt content. Journal of Experimental Botany 36: 1240-1248.
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Photosynthesis under stressful environments: An overview
Ashraf, M., & Harris, P. J. C. (2013) · Photosynthetica · doi:10.1007/s11099-013-0021-6 · Cited by 2,028 · see citing works
Zhang, H., Liu, X.-L., Zhang, R.-X., Yuan, H.-Y., Wang, M.-M., Yang, H.-Y., Ma, H.-Y., Liu, D., Jiang, C.-J., & Liang, Z.-W. (2017) · Frontiers in Plant Science · doi:10.3389/fpls.2017.01580 · Cited by 218 · see citing works
Pandit, P. R., Fulekar, M. H., & Karuna, M. S. L. (2017) · Environmental Science and Pollution Research · doi:10.1007/s11356-017-8875-y · Cited by 208 · see citing works
Wan, H., Chen, L., Guo, J., Li, Q., Wen, J., Yi, B., Ma, C., Tu, J., Fu, T., & Shen, J. (2017) · Frontiers in Plant Science · doi:10.3389/fpls.2017.00593 · Cited by 100 · see citing works
- Authors
- Moradi, F., & Ismail, A. M.
- Affiliations
- International Rice Research Institute (PH)
- Corresponding author
- Ismail, A. M.
- ORCID
- Moradi, F.
- Venue
- Annals of Botany
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 2007-01-26
- Volume
- 99
- Issue
- 6
- Pages
- 1161-1173
- ISSN
- 0305-7364 (ISSN-L)
- 1095-8290
- PMC
- PMC3243573
- OpenAlex
- W2100946670
- Cited by
- 713
- References
- 2
- Citations by year
- 2026: 27 · 2025: 34 · 2024: 36 · 2023: 50 · 2022: 52 · 2021: 54 · 2020: 45 · 2019: 52 · 2018: 42 · 2017: 42 · 2016: 37 · 2015: 50 · 2014: 40 · 2013: 36 · 2012: 39
- FWCI
- 17.82
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
- doi.org
- Locations
- Annals of Botany (publishedVersion)
- Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion)
- PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- CGSPace A Repository of Agricultural Research Outputs (Consultative Group for International Agricultural Research) (submittedVersion)
- Funders
- Agricultural Biotechnology Research Institute of Iran
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Plant Science › Plant Stress Responses and Tolerance
- Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Plant Science › Rice Cultivation and Yield Improvement
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Photosynthetic Processes and Mechanisms
- Keywords
- rice, salt stress, salt tolerance, photosynthesis, stomatal conductance, chlorophyll fluorescence, non-photochemical quenching, reactive oxygen species scavenging, antioxidant enzymes, lipid peroxidation, vitamin C, seedling stage, reproductive stage, IR29, genotype comparison
- MeSH terms
- Chlorophyll, Fluorescence, Glutathione Reductase, Malondialdehyde, Peroxidases, Photosynthesis, Proline, Reproduction, Oryza, Sodium Chloride, Superoxide Dismutase, Lipid Peroxidation, Reactive Oxygen Species, Plant Leaves, Plant Shoots, Seedlings, Ascorbate Peroxidases
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review