The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Uniting pattern and process in plant–animal mutualistic networks: a review
Open accessAbstract
BACKGROUND: Ecologists and evolutionary biologists are becoming increasingly interested in networks as a framework to study plant-animal mutualisms within their ecological context. Although such focus on networks has brought about important insights into the structure of these interactions, relatively little is still known about the mechanisms behind these patterns. SCOPE: The aim in this paper is to offer an overview of the mechanisms influencing the structure of plant-animal mutualistic networks. A brief summary is presented of the salient network patterns, the potential mechanisms are discussed and the studies that have evaluated them are reviewed. This review shows that researchers of plant-animal mutualisms have made substantial progress in the understanding of the processes behind the patterns observed in mutualistic networks. At the same time, we are still far from a thorough, integrative mechanistic understanding. We close with specific suggestions for directions of future research, which include developing methods to evaluate the relative importance of mechanisms influencing network patterns and focusing research efforts on selected representative study systems throughout the world.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Emergence of Scaling in Random Networks
Barabási, A.-L., & Albert, R. (1999) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.286.5439.509 · Cited by 36,135
Evolutionary Ecology of Parasites: Second Edition
Poulin, R. (2007) · doi:10.1515/9781400840809 · Cited by 1,671
Interaction frequency as a surrogate for the total effect of animal mutualists on plants
Vázquez, D. P., Morris, W. F., & Jordano, P. (2005) · Ecology Letters · doi:10.1111/j.1461-0248.2005.00810.x · Cited by 599
Self-citation
Cited by
Interaction rewiring and the rapid turnover of plant–pollinator networks
CaraDonna, P. J., Petry, W. K., Brennan, R. M., Cunningham, J. L., Bronstein, J. L., Waser, N. M., & Sanders, N. J. (2017) · Ecology Letters · doi:10.1111/ele.12740 · Cited by 395
Impacts of deforestation on plant-pollinator networks assessed using an agent based model
Newton, A. C., Boscolo, D., Ferreira, P. A., Lopes, L. E., & Evans, P. (2018) · PLOS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0209406 · Cited by 29
Metadata
- Authors
- Vázquez, D. P., Blüthgen, N., Cagnolo, L., & Chacoff, N. P.
- Venue
- Annals of Botany
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 2009-03-22
- Volume
- 103
- Issue
- 9
- Pages
- 1445-1457
- ISSN
- 0305-7364 (ISSN-L)
- 1095-8290
- OpenAlex
- W2161288630
- Cited by
- 628
- References
- 3
- FWCI
- 32.84
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Uniting pattern and process in plant–animal mutualistic networks: a review. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1093/aob/mcp057
- The paper
- Vázquez, D. P., Blüthgen, N., Cagnolo, L., & Chacoff, N. P. (2009). Uniting pattern and process in plant–animal mutualistic networks: a review. Annals of Botany. https://doi.org/10.1093/aob/mcp057
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.