The DOI matches its Crossref record; 25 of the 25 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Agricultural use of wetlands: opportunities and limitations
Open accessAbstract
BACKGROUND: Wetlands are species-rich habitats performing valuable ecosystem services such as flood protection, water quality enhancement, food chain support and carbon sequestration. Worldwide, wetlands have been drained to convert them into agricultural land or industrial and urban areas. A realistic estimate is that 50 % of the world's wetlands have been lost. SCOPE: This paper reviews the relationship between wetlands and agriculture with the aim to identify the successes and failures of agricultural use in different types of wetlands, with reference to short-term and long-term benefits and issues of sustainability. It also addresses a number of recent developments which will lead to pressure to reclaim and destroy natural wetlands, i.e. the continuous need for higher production to feed an increasing world population and the increasing cultivation of energy crops. Finally, attention is paid to the development of more flood-tolerant crop cultivars. CONCLUSIONS: Agriculture has been carried out in several types of (former) wetlands for millennia, with crop fields on river floodplain soils and rice fields as major examples. However, intensive agricultural use of drained/reclaimed peatlands has been shown to lead to major problems because of the oxidation and subsidence of the peat soil. This does not only lead to severe carbon dioxide emissions, but also results in low-lying land which needs to be protected against flooding. Developments in South-East Asia, where vast areas of tropical peatlands are being converted into oil palm plantations, are of great concern in this respect. Although more flood-tolerant cultivars of commercial crop species are being developed, these are certainly not suitable for cultivation in wetlands with prolonged flooding periods, but rather will survive relatively short periods of waterlogging in normally improved agricultural soils. From a sustainability perspective, reclamation of peatlands for agriculture should be strongly discouraged. The opportunities for agriculture in naturally functioning floodplains should be further investigated. The development and use of crop cultivars with an even stronger flood tolerance could form part of the sustainable use of such floodplain systems. Extensive use of wetlands without drastic reclamation measures and without fertilizer and pesticides might result in combinations of food production with other wetland services, with biodiversity remaining more or less intact. There is a need for research by agronomists and environmental scientists to optimize such solutions.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
de Groot, R. S., Wilson, M. A., & Boumans, R. M. J. (2002) · Ecological Economics · doi:10.1016/s0921-8009(02)00089-7 · Cited by 4,809
Ecosystems and human well-being: current state and trends
Hassan, R., Scholes, R. J., & Ash, N. (2005) · Cited by 2,582
WETLAND RESOURCES: Status, Trends, Ecosystem Services, and Restorability
Zedler, J. B., & Kercher, S. (2005) · Annual Review of Environment and Resources · doi:10.1146/annurev.energy.30.050504.144248 · Cited by 2,276
Ecosystems and Human well-being
Butler, C. D., Chambers, R., Chopra, K., Dasgupta, P. S., Duraiappah, A. K., Kumar, P., McMichael, A. J., & Wells, J. (2003) · Deakin Research Online (Deakin University) · Cited by 1,917
(2002) · Medical Entomology and Zoology · Cited by 1,279
The value of wetlands: importance of scale and landscape setting
Mitsch, W. J., & Gosselink, J. G. (2000) · Ecological Economics · doi:10.1016/s0921-8009(00)00165-8 · Cited by 1,149
World agriculture: towards 2015/2030: an FAO perspective
Thomson, K. J. (2003) · Land Use Policy · doi:10.1016/s0264-8377(03)00047-4 · Cited by 868
Nature Management by Grazing and Cutting
Bakker, J. P. (1989) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-94-009-2255-6 · Cited by 673
A bottom-up assessment and review of global bio-energy potentials to 2050
SMEETS, E., FAAIJ, A., LEWANDOWSKI, I., & TURKENBURG, W. (2007) · Progress in Energy and Combustion Science · doi:10.1016/j.pecs.2006.08.001 · Cited by 649
Review of prospects for germplasm improvement for waterlogging tolerance in wheat, barley and oats
Setter, T. L., & Waters, I. (2003) · Plant and Soil · doi:10.1023/a:1024573305997 · Cited by 612
Self-citation
Cited by
Extensive global wetland loss over the past three centuries
Fluet-Chouinard, E., Stocker, B. D., Zhang, Z., Malhotra, A., Melton, J. R., Poulter, B., Kaplan, J. O., Goldewijk, K. K., Siebert, S., Minayeva, T., et al. (2023) · Nature · doi:10.1038/s41586-022-05572-6 · Cited by 964
Sustainable development and the water–energy–food nexus: A perspective on livelihoods
Biggs, E. M., Bruce, E., Boruff, B., Duncan, J. M. A., Horsley, J., Pauli, N., McNeill, K., Neef, A., Van Ogtrop, F., Curnow, J., et al. (2015) · Environmental Science & Policy · doi:10.1016/j.envsci.2015.08.002 · Cited by 894
Management swing potential for bioenergy crops
Davis, S. C., Boddey, R. M., Alves, B. J. R., Cowie, A. L., George, B. H., Ogle, S. M., Smith, P., van Noordwijk, M., & van Wijk, M. T. (2013) · GCB Bioenergy · doi:10.1111/gcbb.12042 · Cited by 127
Metadata
- Authors
- Verhoeven, J. T. A., & Setter, T. L.
- Venue
- Annals of Botany
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 2009-08-21
- Volume
- 105
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 155-163
- ISSN
- 0305-7364 (ISSN-L)
- 1095-8290
- OpenAlex
- W2136542064
- Cited by
- 409
- References
- 25
- FWCI
- 5.50
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Agricultural use of wetlands: opportunities and limitations. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1093/aob/mcp172
- The paper
- Verhoeven, J. T. A., & Setter, T. L. (2010). Agricultural use of wetlands: opportunities and limitations. Annals of Botany. https://doi.org/10.1093/aob/mcp172
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.