The DOI matches its Crossref record; 63 of the 63 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
The selfing syndrome: a model for studying the genetic and evolutionary basis of morphological adaptation in plants
Open accessAbstract
BACKGROUND: In angiosperm evolution, autogamously selfing lineages have been derived from outbreeding ancestors multiple times, and this transition is regarded as one of the most common evolutionary tendencies in flowering plants. In most cases, it is accompanied by a characteristic set of morphological and functional changes to the flowers, together termed the selfing syndrome. Two major areas that have changed during evolution of the selfing syndrome are sex allocation to male vs. female function and flower morphology, in particular flower (mainly petal) size and the distance between anthers and stigma. SCOPE: A rich body of theoretical, taxonomic, ecological and genetic studies have addressed the evolutionary modification of these two trait complexes during or after the transition to selfing. Here, we review our current knowledge about the genetics and evolution of the selfing syndrome. CONCLUSIONS: We argue that because of its frequent parallel evolution, the selfing syndrome represents an ideal model for addressing basic questions about morphological evolution and adaptation in flowering plants, but that realizing this potential will require the molecular identification of more of the causal genes underlying relevant trait variation.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
The genetical theory of natural selection
Fisher, R. A. (1930) · doi:10.5962/bhl.title.27468 · Cited by 17,617
Charnov, E. L. (1982) · PubMed · Cited by 2,886
Female Control: Sexual Selection by Cryptic Female Choice
Eberhard, W. (1996) · Princeton University Press eBooks · doi:10.1515/9780691207209 · Cited by 2,749
Variation and Evolution in Plants
Stebbins, G. L. (1950) · doi:10.7312/steb94536 · Cited by 2,704
SELF-COMPATIBILITY AND ESTABLISHMENT AFTER ‘“LONG-DISTANCE” DISPERSAL
Baker, H. G. (1955) · Evolution · doi:10.1111/j.1558-5646.1955.tb01544.x · Cited by 1,648
The evolution of apical dominance in maize
Doebley, J., Stec, A., & Hubbard, L. (1997) · Nature · doi:10.1038/386485a0 · Cited by 1,552
POLLEN-OVULE RATIOS: A CONSERVATIVE INDICATOR OF BREEDING SYSTEMS IN FLOWERING PLANTS
Cruden, R. W. (1977) · Evolution · doi:10.1111/j.1558-5646.1977.tb00979.x · Cited by 1,465
Flowering Plants: Evolution Above the Species Level
Stebbins, G. L. (1974) · Harvard University Press eBooks · doi:10.4159/harvard.9780674864856 · Cited by 1,366
A Mathematical Theory of Natural and Artificial Selection, Part V: Selection and Mutation
Haldane, J. B. S. (1927) · Mathematical Proceedings of the Cambridge Philosophical Society · doi:10.1017/s0305004100015644 · Cited by 1,326
The genetics of quantitative traits: challenges and prospects
Mackay, T. F. C., Stone, E. A., & Ayroles, J. F. (2009) · Nature Reviews Genetics · doi:10.1038/nrg2612 · Cited by 1,303
Cited by
Real-time divergent evolution in plants driven by pollinators
Gervasi, D. D. L., & Schiestl, F. P. (2017) · Nature Communications · doi:10.1038/ncomms14691 · Cited by 312
Metadata
- Authors
- Sicard, A., & Lenhard, M.
- Venue
- Annals of Botany
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 2011-02-07
- Volume
- 107
- Issue
- 9
- Pages
- 1433-1443
- ISSN
- 0305-7364 (ISSN-L)
- 1095-8290
- OpenAlex
- W2128644192
- Cited by
- 391
- References
- 63
- FWCI
- 5.64
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: The selfing syndrome: a model for studying the genetic and evolutionary basis of morphological adaptation in plants. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1093/aob/mcr023
- The paper
- Sicard, A., & Lenhard, M. (2011). The selfing syndrome: a model for studying the genetic and evolutionary basis of morphological adaptation in plants. Annals of Botany. https://doi.org/10.1093/aob/mcr023
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.