The role of pollinators in maintaining variation in flower colour in the Rocky Mountain columbine,Aquilegia coerulea
Open accessAbstract
BACKGROUND AND AIMS: Flower colour varies within and among populations of the Rocky Mountain columbine, Aquilegia coerulea, in conjunction with the abundance of its two major pollinators, hawkmoths and bumble-bees. This study seeks to understand whether the choice of flower colour by these major pollinators can help explain the variation in flower colour observed in A. coerulea populations. METHODS: Dual choice assays and experimental arrays of blue and white flowers were used to determine the preference of hawkmoths and bumble-bees for flower colour. A test was made to determine whether a differential preference for flower colour, with bumble-bees preferring blue and hawkmoths white flowers, could explain the variation in flower colour. Whether a single pollinator could maintain a flower colour polymorphism was examined by testing to see if preference for a flower colour varied between day and dusk for hawkmoths and whether bumble-bees preferred novel or rare flower colour morphs. KEY RESULTS: Hawkmoths preferred blue flowers under both day and dusk light conditions. Naïve bumble-bees preferred blue flowers but quickly learned to forage randomly on the two colour morphs when similar rewards were presented in the flowers. Bees quickly learned to associate a flower colour with a pollen reward. Prior experience affected the choice of flower colour by bees, but they did not preferentially visit novel flower colours or rare or common colour morphs. CONCLUSIONS: Differences in flower colour preference between the two major pollinators could not explain the variation in flower colour observed in A. coerulea. The preference of hawkmoths for flower colour did not change between day and dusk, and bumble-bees did not prefer a novel or a rare flower colour morph. The data therefore suggest that factors other than pollinators may be more likely to affect the flower colour variation observed in A. coerulea.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Pollinators exhibit foraging preferences, disproportionately visiting flowers of particular colors, as documented in both controlled laboratory settings and natural field conditions.
“Extensive studies—both in controlled laboratory settings and natural field conditions—have documented pollinators exhibiting foraging preferences, in which they disproportionately visit flowers of particular colors”
From Variation in context‐dependent foraging behavior across pollinators (2017) · cites this paper as Thairu & Brunet, 2015
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Variation in context‐dependent foraging behavior across pollinators
Briggs, H. M., Graham, S., Switzer, C. M., & Hopkins, R. (2017) · bioRxiv · doi:10.1101/210377 · Cited by 18 · see citing works
- Authors
- Thairu, M. W., & Brunet, J.
- Affiliations
- Agricultural Research Service (US)
- Corresponding author
- Brunet, Johanne
- Venue
- Annals of Botany
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 2015-03-25
- Volume
- 115
- Issue
- 6
- Pages
- 971-979
- ISSN
- 0305-7364 (ISSN-L)
- 1095-8290
- PMC
- PMC4407065
- OpenAlex
- W2145222715
- Cited by
- 30
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 1 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 5 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 1 · 2018: 6 · 2017: 4 · 2015: 1
- FWCI
- 4.07
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
- Licence
- public-domain
- Locations
- Annals of Botany (publishedVersion, public-domain)
- Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion, public-domain)
- PubMed Central (publishedVersion, public-domain)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- University of Wisconsin-Madison
- Graduate Women in Science
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics › Plant and animal studies
- Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Insect Science › Insect-Plant Interactions and Control
- Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics › Animal Behavior and Reproduction
- Keywords
- Aquilegia coerulea, flower color polymorphism, pollinator preference, Sphingidae, bumblebees, color learning, plant-pollinator interactions, light conditions
- MeSH terms
- Animals, Bees, Choice Behavior, Color, Moths, Pigmentation, Pollen, Aquilegia, Flowers, Pollination
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review