Cited by 30Plant and animal studiesInsect-Plant Interactions and ControlAnimal Behavior and Reproduction

The role of pollinators in maintaining variation in flower colour in the Rocky Mountain columbine,Aquilegia coerulea

Open access
Thairu, Margaret W., Brunet, Johanne·2015·Annals of Botany

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND AIMS: Flower colour varies within and among populations of the Rocky Mountain columbine, Aquilegia coerulea, in conjunction with the abundance of its two major pollinators, hawkmoths and bumble-bees. This study seeks to understand whether the choice of flower colour by these major pollinators can help explain the variation in flower colour observed in A. coerulea populations. METHODS: Dual choice assays and experimental arrays of blue and white flowers were used to determine the preference of hawkmoths and bumble-bees for flower colour. A test was made to determine whether a differential preference for flower colour, with bumble-bees preferring blue and hawkmoths white flowers, could explain the variation in flower colour. Whether a single pollinator could maintain a flower colour polymorphism was examined by testing to see if preference for a flower colour varied between day and dusk for hawkmoths and whether bumble-bees preferred novel or rare flower colour morphs. KEY RESULTS: Hawkmoths preferred blue flowers under both day and dusk light conditions. Naïve bumble-bees preferred blue flowers but quickly learned to forage randomly on the two colour morphs when similar rewards were presented in the flowers. Bees quickly learned to associate a flower colour with a pollen reward. Prior experience affected the choice of flower colour by bees, but they did not preferentially visit novel flower colours or rare or common colour morphs. CONCLUSIONS: Differences in flower colour preference between the two major pollinators could not explain the variation in flower colour observed in A. coerulea. The preference of hawkmoths for flower colour did not change between day and dusk, and bumble-bees did not prefer a novel or a rare flower colour morph. The data therefore suggest that factors other than pollinators may be more likely to affect the flower colour variation observed in A. coerulea.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1093/aob/mcv028

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Pollinators exhibit foraging preferences, disproportionately visiting flowers of particular colors, as documented in both controlled laboratory settings and natural field conditions.

    “Extensive studies—both in controlled laboratory settings and natural field conditions—have documented pollinators exhibiting foraging preferences, in which they disproportionately visit flowers of particular colors”

    From Variation in context‐dependent foraging behavior across pollinators (2017) · cites this paper as Thairu & Brunet, 2015

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Thairu, M. W., & Brunet, J.
Affiliations
Agricultural Research Service (US)
Corresponding author
Brunet, Johanne
Venue
Annals of Botany
Published
2015-03-25
Volume
115
Issue
6
Pages
971-979
ISSN
  • 0305-7364 (ISSN-L)
  • 1095-8290
OpenAlex
W2145222715
Cited by
30
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 5 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 1 · 2018: 6 · 2017: 4 · 2015: 1
FWCI
4.07
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
public-domain
Locations
  • Annals of Botany (publishedVersion, public-domain)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion, public-domain)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, public-domain)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • University of Wisconsin-Madison
  • Graduate Women in Science
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics › Plant and animal studies
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Insect Science › Insect-Plant Interactions and Control
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics › Animal Behavior and Reproduction
Keywords
Aquilegia coerulea, flower color polymorphism, pollinator preference, Sphingidae, bumblebees, color learning, plant-pollinator interactions, light conditions
MeSH terms
Animals, Bees, Choice Behavior, Color, Moths, Pigmentation, Pollen, Aquilegia, Flowers, Pollination

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review