The Discursive Co-construction of Knowledge, Identity, and Difference: An Ethnography of Communication in the High School Mainstream
Abstract
This article describes the ethnography of communication as a viable, context‐ and culture‐sensitive method for conducting research on classroom discourse. I first provide an overview of the method and its role in applied linguistics research and then present a study of discourse in mainstream high school classes with a large proportion of students who speak English as a second language. Drawing on social constructivist views of language learning and socialization that recognize the role of participation in language‐mediated activities in people's development as fully competent members of sociocultural groups, I examine the macro‐ and micro‐level contexts of communication within one content‐area course. I focus on the discourse and interactional features associated with teacher‐led whole‐class discussions, examining the sequential organization of talk, including turn‐taking and other features of participation, and explicit and implicit references to cultural identity and difference. The paper reveals the contradictions and tensions in classroom discourse and in a teacher's attempts to foster respect for cultural identity and difference in a linguistically and socioculturally heterogeneous discourse community. I conclude with a poststructural commentary on the ethnography of communication.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Much of the research in the poststructuralist tradition has highlighted the problems that occur when teachers or their institutions do not recognize or respect the identities of classroom language learners, as in case studies of ESL learners in North American mainstream schools who reject the stigmatized 'ESL' identity imposed upon them and feel disempowered in relation to their 'native' peers.
“Indeed, much of the research in this tradition has highlighted the problems that occur when teachers or their institutions do not recognize or respect the identities of classroom language learners, as in Toohey (2000), Duff (2002) and Talmy (2008), all case studies of English as a second language (ESL) learners in North American mainstream schools who reject the stigmatized 'ESL' identity imposed”
From The motivational dimension of language teaching (2017) · cites this paper as Duff (2002)
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Second Language Use, Socialization, and Learning in Internet Interest Communities and Online Gaming
THORNE, S. L., BLACK, R. W., & SYKES, J. M. (2009) · The Modern Language Journal · doi:10.1111/j.1540-4781.2009.00974.x · Cited by 516 · see citing works
The motivational dimension of language teaching
Lamb, M. (2017) · Language Teaching · doi:10.1017/s0261444817000088 · Cited by 361 · see citing works
- Authors
- Duff, P. A.
- Corresponding author
- Duff, P. A.
- ORCID
- Duff, P. A.
- Venue
- Applied Linguistics
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 2002-09-01
- Volume
- 23
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 289-322
- ISSN
- 0142-6001 (ISSN-L)
- 1477-450X
- OpenAlex
- W2047714189
- Cited by
- 437
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 10 · 2025: 10 · 2024: 19 · 2023: 11 · 2022: 15 · 2021: 11 · 2020: 28 · 2019: 24 · 2018: 25 · 2017: 21 · 2016: 24 · 2015: 32 · 2014: 21 · 2013: 22 · 2012: 23
- FWCI
- 68.06
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Applied Linguistics (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Language and Linguistics › Language, Discourse, Communication Strategies
- Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Language and Linguistics › EFL/ESL Teaching and Learning
- Social Sciences › Linguistics and Language › Multilingual Education and Policy
- Keywords
- ethnography of communication, classroom discourse, ESL learners, cultural identity, cultural differences, turn-taking, discourse communities, social constructivism, poststructuralism
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review