Modelling the relationships among interlanguage pragmatic development, L2 proficiency, and exposure to L2
Abstract
This study aimed to account for the different levels of pragmatic development among 137 university‐level Japanese learners of English, as functions of their varying levels of English proficiency and amount of exposure to English. Their pragmatic development was assessed by the degree of approximation to native speech act behaviour in various advice‐giving situations repeated during the course of an academic year. Unique to this study in interlanguage pragmatics was the use of structural equation modelling (SEM) with latent variables that permits formulation and comparisons of several competing causal models. Although the results revealed the persistent effect of pragmatic competence on itself over the duration of the study, they also suggested that amount of exposure had greater potential to account for pragmatic development than level of proficiency.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
This lends support to Matsumura (2003), who found that the effect of L2 proficiency on the development of L2 pragmatic knowledge is 'very weak and non-significant'.
“This lends support to Matsumura (2003), who similarly found that the effect of L2 proficiency on the development of L2 pragmatic knowledge is 'very weak and non-significant' (p. 485).”
From 'Sorry, I don't good English': Japanese L2 students' written peer feedback in the face-to-face and anonymous review modes (2023) · cites this paper as Matsumura (2003)
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Warschauer, M., Tseng, W., Yim, S., Webster, T., Jacob, S., Du, Q., & Tate, T. (2023) · doi:10.2139/ssrn.4404380 · Cited by 425 · see citing works
The pragmatics of advice giving: Cross-cultural perspectives
DeCapua, A., & Dunham, J. F. (2007) · Intercultural Pragmatics · doi:10.1515/ip.2007.016 · Cited by 92 · see citing works
Kim, S. (2023) · Journal of Writing Research · doi:10.17239/jowr-2023.15.02.02 · Cited by 6 · see citing works
- Authors
- Matsumura, S.
- Corresponding author
- Matsumura, S.
- ORCID
- Matsumura, S.
- Venue
- Applied Linguistics
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 2003-12-01
- Volume
- 24
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 465-491
- ISSN
- 0142-6001 (ISSN-L)
- 1477-450X
- OpenAlex
- W2130137026
- Cited by
- 195
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 6 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 8 · 2023: 12 · 2022: 10 · 2021: 11 · 2020: 8 · 2019: 7 · 2018: 11 · 2017: 4 · 2016: 10 · 2015: 13 · 2014: 28 · 2013: 12 · 2012: 17
- FWCI
- 23.37
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Applied Linguistics (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Language and Linguistics › Linguistics and Language Analysis
- Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Language and Linguistics › EFL/ESL Teaching and Learning
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Second Language Acquisition and Learning
- Keywords
- interlanguage pragmatics, pragmatic development, second language proficiency, L2 exposure, Japanese learners of English, causal models, latent variables
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review