The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Integrating Research Areas: A Framework for Second Language Studies1
Abstract
The ultimate goal of second language acquisition research is to come to an understanding of what is acquired and the mechanisms which bring that knowledge about. In recent years, the attempt to understand these issues has come from varying perspectives: some researchers have been concerned with language development as it relates to conversation; others have dealt with the role of affect, while others have investigated first language influences on the process of second language acquisition. What has been lacking is a global and comprehensive view which shows how these various perspectives interlock. In this paper I sketch out such a view incorporating sociolinguistic, psycho-linguistic, and linguistic aspects of acquisition. Within the proposed framework, there are five levels in a learner's conversion of ambient speech (input) to output: (1) apperceived input, (2) comprehended input, (3) intake, (4) integration, and (5) output. In this paper I expand upon each of these levels as well as explicate the factors which mediate between one level and another. In addition, I discuss implications for fossilization and variation as they relate to concepts presented.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
The Role of Consciousness in Second Language Learning1
SCHMIDT, R. W. (1990) · Applied Linguistics · doi:10.1093/applin/11.2.129 · Cited by 5,435
“In addition, a satisfactory treatment of intake needs to take into consideration the fact that it is unlikely that all input used in the comprehension of message meaning also functions as intake for the learning of form (Sharwood Smith 1986: Gass 1988; Faerch and Kasper 1986; Van Patten 1985, 1987).”
BackgroundThe Role of the Linguistic Environment in Second Language Acquisition
Long, M. H. (1996) · Handbook of Second Language Acquisition · doi:10.1016/b978-012589042-7/50015-3 · Cited by 3,927
Pica, T. (1994) · Language Learning · doi:10.1111/j.1467-1770.1994.tb01115.x · Cited by 1,200
INPUT, INTERACTION, AND SECOND LANGUAGE DEVELOPMENT: An Empirical Study of Question Formation in ESL
Mackey, A. (1999) · Studies in Second Language Acquisition · doi:10.1017/s0272263199004027 · Cited by 772
HOW DO LEARNERS PERCEIVE INTERACTIONAL FEEDBACK?
Mackey, A., Gass, S., & McDonough, K. (2000) · Studies in Second Language Acquisition · doi:10.1017/s0272263100004010 · Cited by 630
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- GASS, S. M.
- Venue
- Applied Linguistics
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 1988-06-01
- Volume
- 9
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 198-217
- ISSN
- 0142-6001 (ISSN-L)
- 1477-450X
- OpenAlex
- W2129719637
- Cited by
- 392
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 43.29
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Integrating Research Areas: A Framework for Second Language Studies1. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1093/applin/9.2.198
- The paper
- GASS, S. M. (1988). Integrating Research Areas: A Framework for Second Language Studies1. Applied Linguistics. https://doi.org/10.1093/applin/9.2.198
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.