Cited by 430Gender Studies in LanguageGender and Feminist StudiesLinguistic Variation and Morphology

Language, Gender, and Sexuality: Current Issues and New Directions

Cameron, Deborah·2005·Applied Linguistics

Abstract

Sociolinguistic (and some applied linguistic) research dealing with questions of gender and sexuality has undergone significant change in the past 10–15 years, as a paradigm organized around the concept of binary difference has been superseded by one that is concerned with the diversity of gendered and sexual identities and practices. Here the theoretical foundations for the shift in approach—provisionally characterized as a kind of ‘postmodern turn’—are discussed, along with the motivations for it; three areas of empirical research illustrating its practical consequences are then examined in more detail. Some present and future challenges facing researchers in this field of inquiry are also identified and assessed.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1093/applin/ami027

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Cameron characterized the constructivist perspective as post-modern, with emphasis shifting from an essentialist view of culture to a performative process.

    “Deborah Cameron has characterized this constructivist perspective as 'post-modern' (Cameron 2005), which doesn't mean that it has superseded the modern, but that the emphasis has shifted from an essentialist view of culture as the performance of pre-existing values and beliefs to a view of culture as a performative process in which old words can be given new meanings and can give birth to new thoughts.”

    From Language and Culture (2014) · cites this paper as Cameron 2005

  • Cameron has characterized the constructivist perspective as post-modern, meaning the emphasis has shifted from an essentialist view of culture as performance of pre-existing values to a view of culture as a performative process in which old words can be given new meanings and can give birth to new thoughts.

    “Deborah Cameron has characterized this constructivist perspective as 'post-modern' (Cameron 2005), which doesn't mean that it has superseded the modern, but that the emphasis has shifted from an essentialist view of culture as the performance of pre-existing values and beliefs to a view of culture as a performative process in which old words can be given new meanings and can give birth to new”

    From Language and Culture (2014) · cites this paper as Cameron 2005

  • Clear and specific distinctions between male and female authors do not exist.

    “this paper agrees that clear and specific distinctions between male and female authors will lead to nothing since those distinctions do not exist in the first place.”

No citation lists for this paper

No citation lists for this paper yet — checked again daily.

References 53 · Cited by 430

Authors
Cameron, D.
Affiliations
University of Oxford (GB)
Corresponding author
Cameron, Deborah
Venue
Applied Linguistics
Published
2005-12-01
Volume
26
Issue
4
Pages
482-502
ISSN
  • 0142-6001 (ISSN-L)
  • 1477-450X
OpenAlex
W2151231562
Cited by
430
References
53
Citations by year
2026: 15 · 2025: 44 · 2024: 15 · 2023: 54 · 2022: 14 · 2021: 19 · 2020: 22 · 2019: 24 · 2018: 15 · 2017: 25 · 2016: 39 · 2015: 27 · 2014: 24 · 2013: 23 · 2012: 15
FWCI
15.83
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Applied Linguistics (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Gender Studies › Gender Studies in Language
  • Social Sciences › Gender Studies › Gender and Feminist Studies
  • Social Sciences › Linguistics and Language › Linguistic Variation and Morphology
Keywords
gender, sexuality, gendered language, sexual identity, postmodern turn, gendered identity, sexual practices, sociolinguistic theory, paradigm shift

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review