Cited by 336EFL/ESL Teaching and LearningEducation, Achievement, and GiftednessMotivation and Self-Concept in Sports

Systems of Goals, Attitudes, and Self-related Beliefs in Second-Language-Learning Motivation

Kormos, J., Kiddle, T., Csizer, K.·2011·Applied Linguistics

Abstract

In the present study, we surveyed the English language-learning motivations of 518 secondary school students, university students, and young adult learners in the capital of Chile, Santiago. We applied multi-group structural-equation modeling to analyze how language-learning goals, attitudes, self-related beliefs, and parental encouragement interact in shaping motivated behavior and to investigate age- and group-related differences in the internal structure of language-learning motivation. We compared our findings with previous studies using similar instruments in different settings, and based on our findings, we proposed a new interactive model of language-learning motivation, which consists of goal systems, attitudes, self-efficacy beliefs, and future self-guides.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1093/applin/amr019

Cites

6 of 6 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • There are close links between the Ideal L2 self and self-efficacy beliefs.

    “studies by Kormos et al. (2011) and Iwaniec (2013) in Chile and Poland respectively have suggested close links between the Ideal L2 self and self-efficacy beliefs”

    From The motivational dimension of language teaching (2017) · cites this paper as Kormos et al. (2011)

  • When investigated empirically in diverse global contexts, the Ideal L2 self and the L2 learning experience are consistently found to be more closely related to actual or intended learning effort than any other motivational constructs.

    “Wheninvestigated empirically in diverse global contexts, the Ideal L2 self and the L2 learning experience are consistently found to be more closely related to actual or intended learning effort than any other motivational constructs (such as integrative or instrumental orientations, cultural interest, parental encouragement - see Taguchi, Magid & Papi 2009; Kormos, Kiddle & Csiz´ er 2011).”

    From The motivational dimension of language teaching (2017) · cites this paper as Kormos, Kiddle & Csiz´ er 2011

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Kormos, J., Kiddle, T., & Csizer, K.
Affiliations
Eötvös Loránd University (HU)
Corresponding author
Kormos, J.
Venue
Applied Linguistics
Published
2011-05-05
Volume
32
Issue
5
Pages
495-516
ISSN
  • 0142-6001 (ISSN-L)
  • 1477-450X
OpenAlex
W2119612789
Cited by
336
References
6
Citations by year
2026: 13 · 2025: 11 · 2024: 13 · 2023: 29 · 2022: 26 · 2021: 34 · 2020: 34 · 2019: 60 · 2018: 24 · 2017: 19 · 2016: 14 · 2015: 17 · 2014: 14 · 2013: 21 · 2012: 7
FWCI
110.40
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Applied Linguistics (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Language and Linguistics › EFL/ESL Teaching and Learning
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Education, Achievement, and Giftedness
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Motivation and Self-Concept in Sports
Keywords
second language motivation, language learning goals, student attitudes, self-efficacy, parental encouragement, English language learning, age differences, high school students, university students, young adult learners

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review