The DOI matches its Crossref record; 26 of the 26 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Sketching Muslims: A Corpus Driven Analysis of Representations Around the Word 'Muslim' in the British Press 1998-2009
Open accessAbstract
This article uses methods from corpus linguistics and critical discourse analysis to examine patterns of representation around the word Muslim in a 143 million word corpus of British newspaper articles published between 1998 and 2009. Using the analysis tool Sketch Engine, an analysis of noun collocates of Muslim found that the following categories (in order of frequency) were referenced: ethnic/national identity, characterizing/differentiating attributes, conflict, culture, religion, and group/organizations. The ‘conflict’ category was found to be particularly lexically rich, containing many word types. It was also implicitly indexed in the other categories. Following this, an analysis of the two most frequent collocate pairs: Muslim world and Muslim community showed that they were used to collectivize Muslims, both emphasizing their sameness to each other and their difference to ‘The West’. Muslims were also represented as easily offended, alienated, and in conflict with non-Muslims. The analysis additionally considered legitimation strategies that enabled editors to print more controversial representations, and concludes with a discussion of researcher bias and an extended notion of audience through online social networks.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Van Dijk, T. A. (2015) · The Handbook of Discourse Analysis · doi:10.1002/9781118584194.ch22 · Cited by 5,485
Methods of Critical Discourse Analysis
Wodak, R., & Meyer, M. (2001) · doi:10.4135/9780857028020 · Cited by 4,725
An Introduction to Social Constructionism
Burr, V. (1995) · Taylor & Francis eBooks · doi:10.4324/9780203299968 · Cited by 3,286
Corpus, Concordance, Collocation
Odlin, T., & Sinclair, J. (1994) · The Modern Language Journal · doi:10.2307/330144 · Cited by 2,297
Baker, P., Gabrielatos, C., KhosraviNik, M., Krzyżanowski, M., McEnery, T., & Wodak, R. (2008) · Discourse & Society · doi:10.1177/0957926508088962 · Cited by 1,931
Self-citationTognini-Bonelli, E. (2001) · Studies in Corpus Linguistics · doi:10.1075/scl.6 · Cited by 1,756
Critical discourse analysis: history, agenda, theory, and methodology.
Wodak, R. (2009) · Lancaster EPrints (Lancaster University) · Cited by 1,440
Legitimation in discourse and communication
Van Leeuwen, T. (2007) · Discourse & Communication · doi:10.1177/1750481307071986 · Cited by 1,237
Culturally Speaking: Managing Rapport Through Talk Across Cultures
Spencer‐Oatey, H. (2004) · Medical Entomology and Zoology · Cited by 768
Gabrielatos, C., & Baker, P. (2008) · Journal of English Linguistics · doi:10.1177/0075424207311247 · Cited by 749
Self-citation
Cited by
Exploring Engagement in Tasks in the Language Classroom
Philp, J., & Duchesne, S. (2016) · Annual Review of Applied Linguistics · doi:10.1017/s0267190515000094 · Cited by 752
Statistics in Corpus Linguistics: A Practical Guide
Brezina, V. (2018) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/9781316410899 · Cited by 648
Metadata
- Authors
- Baker, P., Gabrielatos, C., & McEnery, T.
- Venue
- Applied Linguistics
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 2012-10-12
- Volume
- 34
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 255-278
- ISSN
- 0142-6001 (ISSN-L)
- 1477-450X
- OpenAlex
- W2092393536
- Cited by
- 320
- References
- 26
- FWCI
- 12.69
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Sketching Muslims: A Corpus Driven Analysis of Representations Around the Word 'Muslim' in the British Press 1998-2009. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1093/applin/ams048
- The paper
- Baker, P., Gabrielatos, C., & McEnery, T. (2013). Sketching Muslims: A Corpus Driven Analysis of Representations Around the Word 'Muslim' in the British Press 1998-2009. Applied Linguistics. https://doi.org/10.1093/applin/ams048
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.