Cited by 119Linguistics and Education ResearchDiscourse Analysis in Language StudiesCultural and political discourse analysis

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Poststructuralism and its Challenges for Applied Linguistics

McNamara, T.·2012·Applied Linguistics

Abstract

This Special Issue argues for the relevance to applied linguistics of the thinking about language, discourse, subjectivity, and power within the movement in philosophy known as poststructuralism. It is an attempt to bring into more productive contact work on language within applied linguistics as a social science on the one hand, and within the humanities, particularly philosophy, social theory, and literary studies, on the other hand. It aims to demonstrate how incorporating poststructuralist perspectives challenges many of the underlying assumptions of work in applied linguistics, including work with a socially critical focus, and suggests new possibilities for methodologies of research, and new ways of writing. Ever since the foundational work of Saussure, linguistics (and subsequently applied linguistics) has been constituted as a field within the social and behavioural sciences. This has led to an odd split. The study of language has continued within other disciplines to the point where language and discourse have assumed a central role within the humanities in theorizing concepts of culture, society, individual identity, the psyche, and relations of power. Parallel to this, within linguistics and applied linguistics, a social science account of language has been richly elaborated in the century since Saussure. The split raises the question of how work on language on either side might become known to each and act as a potential for mutually beneficial influence.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1093/applin/ams055

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The turn from a structuralist to a post-structuralist approach to language and culture has been spearheaded by critical sociolinguists like Blommaert, critical applied linguists like Pennycook and McNamara, feminists like Cameron, and proponents of complexity theory in SLA like Larsen-Freeman.

    “The turn from a structuralist to a post-structuralist approach to language and culture has been spearheaded by critical sociolinguists like Blommaert (2005), critical applied linguists like Pennycook (2007) and McNamara (2012), feminists like Cameron (2005) and proponents of a complexity theoretical approach to SLA like Larsen-Freeman (1997).”

    From Language and Culture (2014) · cites this paper as McNamara (2012)

  • Applied linguists have shown a growing tendency to draw theoretical inspiration from scholars in the social sciences, physical sciences, and human sciences, out of the need to account for multilingual, multimodal, global conditions in which language is learned and used.

    “We have seen the growing tendency among applied linguists to draw their theoretical inspiration from scholars not only in the social sciences but also in the physical and the human sciences, out of the need to take account of the multilingual, multimodal, global conditions in which language is learned and used.”

    From Language and Culture (2014) · cites this paper as McNamara 2012

Citations

Cites

No references could be resolved yet.

Research works printed but not linked: 4

  1. 1996, TESOL QUARTERLY, 30, 693, 10.2307/3587930 · DOI
  2. 2009, LINGUISTICS AND EDUCATION, 20, 10, 10.1016/j.linged.2009.01.003 · DOI
  3. 2010, APPLIED LINGUISTICS REVIEW, 1, 23, 10.1515/9783110222654.23 · DOI
  4. PENNYCOOK, 1994, Applied Linguistics, 15, 115, 10.1093/applin/15.2.115 · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
McNamara, T.
Affiliations
The University of Melbourne (AU)
Corresponding author
McNamara, T.
Venue
Applied Linguistics
Published
2012-10-30
Volume
33
Issue
5
Pages
473-482
ISSN
  • 0142-6001 (ISSN-L)
  • 1477-450X
OpenAlex
W2331920719
Cited by
119
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 6 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 6 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 44 · 2019: 20 · 2018: 5 · 2017: 4 · 2016: 9 · 2015: 5 · 2014: 8 · 2013: 1
FWCI
79.66
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Applied Linguistics (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Education › Linguistics and Education Research
  • Social Sciences › Linguistics and Language › Discourse Analysis in Language Studies
  • Social Sciences › Linguistics and Language › Cultural and political discourse analysis
Keywords
poststructuralism, discourse, subjectivity, power, social criticism, research methodology, writing practices, philosophy of language, literary studies, social theory

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review