Cited by 119Neurobiology of Language and BilingualismDementia and Cognitive Impairment ResearchAging and Gerontology Research

Aging and Word-Finding: A Comparison of Spontaneous and Constrained Naming Tests

Open access
Schmitter-Edgecombe, M., Vesneski, M., Jones, D. W. R.·2000·Archives of Clinical Neuropsychology

Abstract

This study compared the word-finding abilities of 26 young adults (ages 18-22 years), 26 young-old adults (ages 58-74 years), and 26 old-old adults (ages 75-93 years) on a confrontational naming test (Boston Naming Test) and a more spontaneous discourse test. The groups were matched in terms of gender (7 male, 19 female) and estimated IQ (M = 114). When participants were asked to narrate what they perceived in pictures (discourse test), the older adult groups committed significantly more word-retrieval errors than the younger adults. In contrast, results from the picture-naming test surprisingly revealed higher naming accuracy by the older adult groups. Subsequent examination of the picture-naming items revealed that four items appeared to be influenced by generational familiarity with the item. These results suggest that selection of cohort-free items for picture-naming tests is important when comparing across age-groups, and that tests of discourse may be better measures for assessing everyday word-finding difficulties in healthy older adults.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1093/arclin/15.6.479

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Schmitter-Edgecombe, M., Vesneski, M., & Jones, D. W. R.
Affiliations
Washington State University (US)
Venue
Archives of Clinical Neuropsychology
Published
2000-08-01
Volume
15
Issue
6
Pages
479-493
ISSN
  • 0887-6177 (ISSN-L)
  • 1873-5843
OpenAlex
W2160247458
Cited by
119
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 6 · 2025: 8 · 2024: 8 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 10 · 2021: 10 · 2020: 5 · 2019: 12 · 2018: 4 · 2017: 6 · 2016: 6 · 2015: 3 · 2014: 7 · 2013: 5 · 2012: 5
FWCI
0.18
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Archives of Clinical Neuropsychology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neurobiology of Language and Bilingualism
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Dementia and Cognitive Impairment Research
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Neuropsychology and Physiological Psychology › Aging and Gerontology Research
Keywords
word retrieval, aging, naming test, Boston Naming Test, spontaneous discourse, picture description, cohort effects, older adults, young-old, healthy aging

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review