Criterion Validity of the Neuropsychological Assessment Battery after Traumatic Brain Injury
Abstract
The performance of 54 patients with complicated mild-severe traumatic brain injury (TBI) was evaluated on the Attention, Executive Functions, and Memory modules of the Neuropsychological Assessment Battery (NAB) and compared with that of 54 demographically matched healthy controls. All three NAB indices demonstrated statistically significant group differences and negative covariances with the duration of coma, with large effect sizes. The Numbers and Letters and Mazes subtests had the most consistent evidence for sensitivity to brain injury. The findings provide preliminary support for the criterion validity of the NAB in the assessment of patients with complicated mild-severe TBI.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The cognitive sequelae of TBI are well documented.
“The cognitive sequelae of TBI are well documented.”
From Using the NIH Toolbox Cognition Battery (NIHTB-CB) in individuals with traumatic brain injury. (2017) · cites this paper as Donders & Levitt, 2012
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Using the NIH Toolbox Cognition Battery (NIHTB-CB) in individuals with traumatic brain injury.
Tulsky, D. S., Carlozzi, N. E., Holdnack, J., Heaton, R. K., Wong, A., Goldsmith, A., & Heinemann, A. W. (2017) · Rehabilitation Psychology · doi:10.1037/rep0000174 · Cited by 67 · see citing works
- Authors
- Donders, J., & Levitt, T.
- Affiliations
- Mary Free Bed Rehabilitation Hospital (US)
- Corresponding author
- Donders, J.
- ORCID
- Donders, J.
- Venue
- Archives of Clinical Neuropsychology
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 2012-04-24
- Volume
- 27
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 440-445
- ISSN
- 0887-6177 (ISSN-L)
- 1873-5843
- OpenAlex
- W2006961323
- Cited by
- 24
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2025: 1 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 3 · 2017: 2 · 2016: 9 · 2014: 3 · 2013: 3 · 2012: 1
- FWCI
- 1.58
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Archives of Clinical Neuropsychology (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Epidemiology › Traumatic Brain Injury Research
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Applied Psychology › Psychological Testing and Assessment
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Cognitive Functions and Memory
- Keywords
- traumatic brain injury, criterion validity, neuropsychological test battery, attention, executive function, memory, coma duration, neuropsychological assessment
- MeSH terms
- Adolescent, Adult, Attention, Brain Injuries, Female, Humans, Male, Memory, Neuropsychological Tests, Psychometrics, Sensitivity and Specificity, Reproducibility of Results, Case-Control Studies, Executive Function
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
