Latent Structure of the Behavior Rating Inventory of Executive Function—Adult Version (BRIEF–A) After Mild Traumatic Brain Injury
Abstract
One hundred persons with mild traumatic brain injury (TBI) and their informants completed the Behavior Rating Inventory of Executive Function-Adult Version (BRIEF-A) within 1-12 months after injury. Exploratory maximum-likelihood factor analysis with oblique rotation revealed that although a traditional 2-factor model fit the informant-report data well, a 3-factor solution fit the self-report data relatively best. These factors were labeled Metacognition, Behavioral Regulation, and Emotional Regulation. The presence of a premorbid history of outpatient psychiatric treatment was strongly predictive of higher scores (reflecting more perceived problems) on each of these 3 factors. Lower educational attainment was associated with higher scores on the Behavioral Regulation factor, whereas absence of intracranial findings on neuroimaging was associated with higher scores on the Emotional Regulation factor. It is concluded that, after mild TBI, self-report data on the BRIEF-A can be interpreted along a 3-factorial model and that high elevations on this instrument are strongly affected by premorbid complications.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Level of performance on List Sorting is consistent with results found with other tests of working memory such as WAIS-IV and WMS-IV Working Memory Indices.
“The level of performance is again consistent to the results found with other tests of working memory such as the WAIS-IV and WMS-IV Working Memory Indices (Carlozzi, Grech, et al., 2013; Carlozzi, Kirsch, et al., 2015; Donders & Strong, 2015).”
From Using the NIH Toolbox Cognition Battery (NIHTB-CB) in individuals with traumatic brain injury. (2017) · cites this paper as Donders & Strong, 2015
Cites
Chaytor, N., & Schmitter-Edgecombe, M. (2003) · Neuropsychology Review · doi:10.1023/b:nerv.0000009483.91468.fb · Cited by 1,055 · see citing works
Fox, J. (1991) · doi:10.4135/9781412985604 · Cited by 1,008 · see citing works
Jha, A. P., Stanley, E. A., Kiyonaga, A., Wong, L., & Gelfand, L. (2010) · Emotion · doi:10.1037/a0018438 · Cited by 906 · see citing works
Mohanty, A., Engels, A. S., Herrington, J. D., Heller, W., Ringo Ho, M., Banich, M. T., Webb, A. G., Warren, S. L., & Miller, G. A. (2007) · Psychophysiology · doi:10.1111/j.1469-8986.2007.00515.x · Cited by 309 · see citing works
Exploring the neurocognitive signature of poor set-shifting in anorexia and bulimia nervosa.
Roberts, M. E., Tchanturia, K., & Treasure, J. L. (2010) · Journal of Psychiatric Research · doi:10.1016/j.jpsychires.2010.03.001 · Cited by 258 · see citing works
Updating positive and negative stimuli in working memory in depression
Levens, S. M., & Gotlib, I. H. (2010) · Journal of Experimental Psychology: General · doi:10.1037/a0020283 · Cited by 248 · see citing works
Pietrzak, R. H., & Cook, J. M. (2013) · Depression and Anxiety · doi:10.1002/da.22083 · Cited by 215 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Using the NIH Toolbox Cognition Battery (NIHTB-CB) in individuals with traumatic brain injury.
Tulsky, D. S., Carlozzi, N. E., Holdnack, J., Heaton, R. K., Wong, A., Goldsmith, A., & Heinemann, A. W. (2017) · Rehabilitation Psychology · doi:10.1037/rep0000174 · Cited by 67 · see citing works
- Authors
- Donders, J., & Strong, C.-A. H.
- Affiliations
- Mary Free Bed Rehabilitation Hospital (US)
- Corresponding author
- Donders, Jacobus
- ORCID
- Donders, Jacobus
- Venue
- Archives of Clinical Neuropsychology
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 2015-07-23
- Volume
- 31
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 29-36
- ISSN
- 0887-6177 (ISSN-L)
- 1873-5843
- OpenAlex
- W2306747663
- Cited by
- 34
- References
- 7
- Citations by year
- 2026: 3 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 4 · 2018: 2 · 2017: 3 · 2016: 2
- FWCI
- 1.83
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Archives of Clinical Neuropsychology (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- HighWire Press Open Archive (submittedVersion)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Epidemiology › Traumatic Brain Injury Research
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Cognitive Functions and Memory
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Historical and Modern Theater Studies
- Keywords
- mild traumatic brain injury, BRIEF-A, executive function, latent structure, metacognition, behavioral regulation, emotion regulation, self-report versus informant report, educational attainment, neuroimaging findings, factor analysis
- MeSH terms
- Adolescent, Adult, Brain Injuries, Cognition Disorders, Factor Analysis, Statistical, Female, Humans, Male, Models, Psychological, Neuropsychological Tests, Young Adult, Executive Function, Self Report
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review