Otoplasty using the combined Mustardé-Furnas technique: Satisfaction and objective results
Abstract
Background: To understand the level of satisfaction among patients undergoing otoplasty using the combined Mustardé-Furnas technique. To evaluate surgery outcomes using McDowell/Wright (MW) criteria. Objectives: The authors sought to analyze any possible correlation between satisfaction level and surgery outcome. Methods: The authors conducted a retrospective study on patients who underwent combined Mustardé and Furnas otoplasty between 1996 and 2016. All patients were assessed 12 months after surgery employing MW goals and satisfaction surveys. Results: The study includes 172 patients who underwent 343 otoplasty procedures. There were 134 patients (77.9%) who had all 6 of the criteria for surgical success as defined by MW 12 months after surgery, reporting satisfaction levels of 9 to 10. Fifteen patients (9.3%) had 5 of the 6 MW criteria, reporting satisfaction levels of 9 to 10, and 22 patients (12.79%) had only 4 MW objectives and reported satisfaction levels of 7 to 10. The Spearman rho coefficient was 0.545 and the Kendall coefficient was 0.375, with a statistically significant association (P < 0.001). Conclusions: Patient satisfaction increases as the number of MW goals are met, although the correlation is moderate to low. Patients perceive the results of the surgery as satisfactory or very satisfactory, even when ENT surgeons consider outcomes to be poor according to MW criteria. Level of Evidence: 4:
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
There is still no clear consensus on the most effective surgical approach for minimizing recurrence and complications.
“Despite these advances, there is still no clear consensus on the most effective surgical approach for minimizing recurrence and complications.”
From Comparative Analysis of Mustardé, Fascioperichondrial Flap, and Combined Otoplasty Techniques: Clinical Outcomes and Recurrence Rates in 365 Patients (2025) · cites this paper as [20]
Cites
Complications of otoplasty: a literature review.
Limandjaja, G. C., Breugem, C. C., Mink van der Molen, A. B., & Kon, M. (2009) · Journal of Plastic, Reconstructive & Aesthetic Surgery · doi:10.1016/j.bjps.2008.06.043 · Cited by 151 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Kepekçi, A. H. (2025) · Healthcare · doi:10.3390/healthcare13111325 · Cited by 5 · see citing works
“While some authors favor the classic Mustardé method for its simplicity and short learning curve [20], others advocate for fascial flap-assisted techniques due to their lower complication and recurrence rates [21,22].”
Otoplasty for prominent ear: A systematic review of surgical techniques
Thomson, H., Gosden, J., & Mandal, A. (2026) · JPRAS Open · doi:10.1016/j.jpra.2026.02.013
- Authors
- García-Purriños, F., Raposo, A., Guilllén, A., Calero, J., Giribet, A., & Barrios, A.
- ORCID
- Raposo, Alberto
- Venue
- Aesthetic Surgery Journal
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 2019-06-05
- Volume
- 39
- Issue
- 10
- Pages
- NP411-NP415
- ISSN
- 1090-820X (ISSN-L)
- 1527-330X
- OpenAlex
- W2965083113
- Cited by
- 9
- References
- 1
- Citations by year
- 2026: 2 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 2 · 2022: 2
- FWCI
- 0.48
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Aesthetic Surgery Journal (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Surgery › Reconstructive Facial Surgery Techniques
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Surgery › Nasal Surgery and Airway Studies
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Genetics › Congenital Ear and Nasal Anomalies
- Keywords
- otoplasty, patient satisfaction, surgical outcomes, cosmetic surgery outcomes
- MeSH terms
- Adolescent, Adult, Child, Child, Preschool, Ear, External, Female, Follow-Up Studies, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Recurrence, Reoperation, Retrospective Studies, Otorhinolaryngologic Surgical Procedures, Treatment Outcome, Patient Satisfaction, Plastic Surgery Procedures, Young Adult
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review