Cited by 9Reconstructive Facial Surgery TechniquesNasal Surgery and Airway StudiesCongenital Ear and Nasal Anomalies

Otoplasty using the combined Mustardé-Furnas technique: Satisfaction and objective results

García-Purriños, Francisco, Raposo, Alberto, Guilllén, Alberto, Calero, Juan, Giribet, Ana, Barrios, Andrés·2019·Aesthetic Surgery Journal

Abstract

Background: To understand the level of satisfaction among patients undergoing otoplasty using the combined Mustardé-Furnas technique. To evaluate surgery outcomes using McDowell/Wright (MW) criteria. Objectives: The authors sought to analyze any possible correlation between satisfaction level and surgery outcome. Methods: The authors conducted a retrospective study on patients who underwent combined Mustardé and Furnas otoplasty between 1996 and 2016. All patients were assessed 12 months after surgery employing MW goals and satisfaction surveys. Results: The study includes 172 patients who underwent 343 otoplasty procedures. There were 134 patients (77.9%) who had all 6 of the criteria for surgical success as defined by MW 12 months after surgery, reporting satisfaction levels of 9 to 10. Fifteen patients (9.3%) had 5 of the 6 MW criteria, reporting satisfaction levels of 9 to 10, and 22 patients (12.79%) had only 4 MW objectives and reported satisfaction levels of 7 to 10. The Spearman rho coefficient was 0.545 and the Kendall coefficient was 0.375, with a statistically significant association (P < 0.001). Conclusions: Patient satisfaction increases as the number of MW goals are met, although the correlation is moderate to low. Patients perceive the results of the surgery as satisfactory or very satisfactory, even when ENT surgeons consider outcomes to be poor according to MW criteria. Level of Evidence: 4:

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1093/asj/sjz167

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
García-Purriños, F., Raposo, A., Guilllén, A., Calero, J., Giribet, A., & Barrios, A.
Venue
Aesthetic Surgery Journal
Published
2019-06-05
Volume
39
Issue
10
Pages
NP411-NP415
ISSN
  • 1090-820X (ISSN-L)
  • 1527-330X
OpenAlex
W2965083113
Cited by
9
References
1
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 2 · 2022: 2
FWCI
0.48
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Aesthetic Surgery Journal (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Surgery › Reconstructive Facial Surgery Techniques
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Surgery › Nasal Surgery and Airway Studies
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Genetics › Congenital Ear and Nasal Anomalies
Keywords
otoplasty, patient satisfaction, surgical outcomes, cosmetic surgery outcomes
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Adult, Child, Child, Preschool, Ear, External, Female, Follow-Up Studies, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Recurrence, Reoperation, Retrospective Studies, Otorhinolaryngologic Surgical Procedures, Treatment Outcome, Patient Satisfaction, Plastic Surgery Procedures, Young Adult

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review