Patterns of Egg Laying and Breeding Success in Humboldt Penguins (Spheniscus Humboldti) at Punta San Juan, Peru
Abstract
We analyzed patterns of egg laying and breeding frequency of Humboldt Penguins (Spheniscus humboldti) between 1993 and 1997 at Punta San Juan, Peru. Egg-laying extended from mid-March to the first week of December, showing two well-defined peaks in April and August–September. The extended breeding period of these birds was the result of individuals having a second clutch. About half of the females (n =189) had two clutches per year, most of which were double broods (73%). The date of completion and outcome of reproduction, or whether a change of mates occurred from the previous year, did not affect timing of egg laying. The majority of first clutches (62%) were laid in April each year. Two-clutch breeders that started laying eggs early in April had a higher breeding success than those starting in late April, and double brooders had greater success than single brooders. Two-clutch breeders started to lay eggs earlier than single-clutch breeders. Taking into account that a penguin breeding cycle (from egg laying to fledging) lasts ∼4 months, laying eggs early in April increases the chance of rearing two successful broods per year. During three consecutive years, females tended to have two clutches instead of only one clutch and an average breeding success of 4.54 fledglings over 3 years. Having as many clutches as possible when conditions are favorable appears to be a strategy used by Humboldt Penguins to maximize their lifetime reproductive success within a productive but unpr…
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In comparison to observed mean chick productivity of 0.39 yearlings pair-1 year-1, the fledging success of wild S. humboldti has ranged 0.13-1.51 fledglings pair-1 year-1 in Chile and Peru, depending on levels of disturbance.
“In comparison to our observed mean chick productivity of 0.39 yearlings pair-1 year-1 (0.18-0.62), the fledging success of wild S. humboldti has ranged 0.13-1.51 fledglings pair-1 year-1 in Chile and Peru, depending on levels of disturbance (Ellenberg et al., 2006; Paredes et al., 2002).”
From Husbandry and enclosure influences on penguin behavior and conservation breeding (2016) · cites this paper as Paredes et al., 2002
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Husbandry and enclosure influences on penguin behavior and conservation breeding
Marshall, A. R., Deere, N. J., Little, H. A., Snipp, R., Goulder, J., & Mayer-Clarke, S. (2016) · Zoo Biology · doi:10.1002/zoo.21313 · Cited by 33 · see citing works
- Authors
- Paredes, R., Zavalaga, C. B., & Boness, D. J.
- Affiliations
- Wildlife Conservation Society (US)
- Av. Guardia Chalaca 1333 Callao, Peru
- Smithsonian Institution (US)
- Corresponding author
- Paredes, Rosana
- Boness, Daryl J.
- ORCID
- Zavalaga, Carlos B.
- Venue
- The Auk
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 2002-01-01
- Volume
- 119
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 244-250
- ISSN
- 0004-8038 (ISSN-L)
- 1938-4254
- OpenAlex
- W4246837361
- Cited by
- 18
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 5 · 2025: 1 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 1 · 2016: 1 · 2015: 1 · 2012: 1
- FWCI
- 0.35
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- The Auk (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Ecology › Avian ecology and behavior
- Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics › Animal Behavior and Reproduction
- Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Ecology › Marine animal studies overview
- Keywords
- Humboldt penguin, laying date, breeding frequency, clutch size, double brooding, breeding success, fledging success, reproductive strategies, breeding phenology
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review