The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Death and disappearance: estimating mortality risks associated with philopatry and dispersal
Abstract
Models dealing with the relationship of inbreeding to dispersal, the evolution of cooperative breeding, and the adaptive significance of reproductive suppression all involve a parameter describing die probability that emigration ends in death. Surprisingly, estimates of this parameter (or equivalently, of the probability of dispersing successfully) are virtually absent from the literature. There are formidable difficulties in estimating dispersal risk by direct observation of emigrants, but we contend that many investigators have already collected demographic information that can be used to estimate it indirectly. The root problem is that the proportion of the population diat emigrates from its natal group or home range, e, is not generally observable. Nevertheless, for each value of e diere is only one possible survival rate of emigrants (st) and of philopatric animals (sf) diat can explain the overall survival rate. For study sites Uiat are neither sources nor sinks, we describe a graphical framework within which census data and behavioral observations can be used to place bounds on e, s,, and sp. We use data from a Serengeti population of the dwarf mongoose (HelogaU parvula) to illustrate how different types of data and assumptions allow us to construct better estimates of these parameters. For dwarf mongooses, die approach reveals unexpected differences in dispersal risk among sex and age classes.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
A leisurely look at the bootstrap, the jackknife, and cross-validation
Efron, B., & Gong, G. (1983) · The American Statistician · doi:10.1080/00031305.1983.10483087 · Cited by 3,229
Cited by
Bowler, D. E., & Benton, T. G. (2005) · Biological Reviews · doi:10.1017/s1464793104006645 · Cited by 1,904
Detectability, philopatry, and the distribution of dispersal distances in vertebrates
Koenig, W. D., Van Vuren, D., & Hooge, P. N. (1996) · Trends in Ecology & Evolution · doi:10.1016/s0169-5347(96)20074-6 · Cited by 730
Advances in our understanding of mammalian sex‐biased dispersal
LAWSON HANDLEY, L. J., & PERRIN, N. (2007) · Molecular Ecology · doi:10.1111/j.1365-294x.2006.03152.x · Cited by 640
Scaling of Natal Dispersal Distances in Terrestrial Birds and Mammals
Sutherland, G. D., Harestad, A. S., Price, K., & Lertzman, K. (2000) · Conservation Ecology · doi:10.5751/es-00184-040116 · Cited by 631
The Biology and Conservation of Wild Canids
(2004) · doi:10.1093/acprof:oso/9780198515562.001.0001 · Cited by 321
Metadata
- Authors
- Lucas, J. R., Waser, P. M., & Creel, S. R.
- Venue
- Behavioral Ecology
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 1994
- Volume
- 5
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 135-141
- ISSN
- 1045-2249 (ISSN-L)
- 1465-7279
- OpenAlex
- W2064509526
- Cited by
- 188
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 8.13
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Death and disappearance: estimating mortality risks associated with philopatry and dispersal. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1093/beheco/5.2.135
- The paper
- Lucas, J. R., Waser, P. M., & Creel, S. R. (1994). Death and disappearance: estimating mortality risks associated with philopatry and dispersal. Behavioral Ecology. https://doi.org/10.1093/beheco/5.2.135
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.