Cited by 312Animal Behavior and ReproductionInsect and Arachnid Ecology and BehaviorEvolutionary Game Theory and Cooperation

Forum: The eusociality continuum

Open access
Sherman, Paul W., Lacey, Eileen A., Reeve, Hudson K., Keller, Laurent·1995·Behavioral Ecology

Abstract

Eusocial societies are traditionally characterized by a reproductive division of labor, an overlap of generations, and cooperative care of the breeders' young. Eusociality was once thought to occur only in termites, ants, and some bee and wasp species, but striking evolutionary convergences have recently become apparent between the societies of these insects and those of cooperatively breeding birds and mammals. These parallels have blurred distinctions between cooperative breeding and eusociality, leading to calls for either drastically restricting or expanding usage of these terms. We favor the latter approach. Cooperative breeding and eusociality are not discrete phenomena, but rather form a continuum of fundamentally similar social systems whose main differences lie in the distribution of lifetime reproductive success among group members. Therefore we propose to array vertebrate and invertebrate cooperative breeders along a common axis, representing a standardized measure of reproductive variance, and to drop such (loaded) terms as “primitive” and “advanced” eusociality. The terminology we propose unites all occurrences of alloparental helping of kin under a single theoretical umbrella (e.g., Hamilton's rule). Thus, cooperatively breeding vertebrates can be regarded as eusocial, just as eusocial invertebrates are cooperative breeders. We believe this integrated approach will foster potentially revealing cross-taxon comparisons, which are essential to understanding social evolution in birds, mammals, and insects.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1093/beheco/6.1.102

Cites

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

No references could be resolved yet.

Research works printed but not linked: 43

  1. Alexander RD, Noonan K, Crespi BJ, 1991. The evolution of eiuociality. In: The biology of the naked mole-rat (Sherman PW, JarvisJUM, Alexander RD, ed«). Prince- ton, New Jersey: Princeton University Press; 3-44.
  2. Aoki S, 1982. Soldiers and altruistic dispersal in aphids. In: The biology of social insects (Breed MD, Michener CD, Evam HE, edi). Boulder, Colorado: Westview Press; 154-158.
  3. BourieAFG. 1991. [Review of] The biology of the naked mole-rat. Trends Ecol Evol 6:171-172.
  4. Brown JL, 1987. Helping and communal breeding in birds. Princeton, New Jeney. Princeton University Press.
  5. Cowan DP, 1991. The solitary and praocial Vespidae. In; The social biology of waip» (Ross KG, Matthewi RW, edi). Ithaca, New York; Cornell University Press; 33-73.
  6. Eickwort GC, 1981. Presocial insects. In: Social insects, voL 2 (Hermann HR, ed). New York: Academic Press; 199-280.
  7. Emlen ST, 1991. The evolution of cooperative breeding in birds and mammalt. In; Behavioural ecology: an evo- lutionary approach, 3rd ed (Krebs JR, Davies NB, eds). Oxford; BlackweU; 301-337.
  8. Fitzpatrick JW, Woolfenden GE, 1988. Components of lifetime reproductive success in the Florida scrub jay. In: Reproductive success (Clutton-Brock TH, ed). Chi- cago: University of Chicago Press; 305-320.
  9. Frank LC, Holekamp KE, Smale L, in press. Dominance, demographics, and reproductive success of female spotted hyenas: a long-term field study. In: Serengeti II: Research, management, and conservation of an eco- system (Sinclair ARE, Arcese P, eds). Chicago: Univer- sity of Chicago Press.
  10. Grafen A, 1991. Modelling in behavioral ecology. In: Behavioural ecology: an evolutionary approach, 3rd ed (Krebs JR. Davies NB, eds). Oxford: BlackweU; 5-31.
  11. Greene A, 1991. Dolichovcspula and Vapula. In; The social biology of wasps (Ross KG, Matthews RW, eds). Ithaca, New York: Cornell University Press; 263-308.
  12. Holldobler B, Wilson EO, 1990. The ants. Cambridge, Massachusetts: Harvard University Press.
  13. Hoogtand JL, in press. The black-tailed prairie dog: social life of a burrowing mammal. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
  14. Jarvis JUM. O'Riain MJ, McDaid E, 1991. Growth and factors affecting body size in naked mole-rats. In: The biology of the naked mole-rat (Sherman PW, Jarvis JUM, Alexander RD, eds). Princeton, New Jersey. Princeton University Press; 358-383.
  15. Keller L (ed), 1993. Queen number and sociality in in- sects. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  16. Keller L, Vargo EL, 1993. Reproductive structure and reproductive roles in colonies of eusocial insects. In; Queen number and sociality in insects (Keller L, ed). Oxford; Oxford University Press; 16-44.
  17. Koenig WD, Mumme RL, 1987. Population ecology of the cooperatively breeding acom woodpecker. Prince- ton, New Jersey: Princeton University Press.
  18. Koford RR, Bowen BS, Vehrencamp SL, 1990. Groove- billed anis: joint-nesting in a tropical cuckoo. In: Cooperative breeding in birds: long-term studies of ecology and behavior (Stacey PB, Koenig WD, eds). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 333-356.
  19. Lacey EA, Sherman PW, 1991. Social organization of naked mole-rat colonies: evidence for divisions of labor. In: The biology of the naked mole-rat (Sherman PW, JarvisJUM, Alexander RD, eds). Princeton, New Jersey: Princeton University Press; 275-336.
  20. Ligon JD, Ligon SH, 1990. Green woodhoopoes: life history traits and sodality. In: Cooperative breeding in birds: long-term studies of ecology and behavior (Stacey PB, Koenig WD, eds). Cambridge: Cambridge Univer- sity Press; 31-66.
  21. Michener CD, 1974. The social behavior of the bees. Cambridge, Massachusetts: Harvard University Press.
  22. Moehlman PD, 1986. Ecology of cooperation in canids. In: Ecological aspects of social evolution (Rubenstein DI, Wrangham RW, eds). Princeton, New Jersey Princeton University Press; 64-86.
  23. Packer C, Herbst L, Pusey AE, Bygott JD, Hanby JP, Cairns SJ, Borgerhoff Mulder M, 1988. Reproductive success of lions. In: Reproductive success (Quuon-Brock TH, ed). Chicago: University of Chicago Press; 363- 383.
  24. Peeters C, 1993. Monogyny and polygyny in Ponerine ants with or without queens. In: Queen number and sociality in insects (Keller L, ed). Oxford; Oxford Uni- versity Press; 234-261.
  25. Rabenold KN, 1990. CampjUnhynckus wrens: the ecology of delayed dispersal and cooperation in the Venezuelan savanna. In; Cooperative breeding in birds: long-term studies of ecology and behavior (Stacey PB, Koenig WD, eds). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 157- 196.
  26. Reeve HK, 1991. PolisUs. In: The social biology of wasps (Ross KG, Matthews RW, eds). Ithaca, New York; Cor- nell University Press; 99-148.
  27. Reeve HK, Ramieks FLW, 1993. Queen-queen conflicts in potygynous societies: mutual tolerance and repro- ductive skew. In; Queen number and sociality in insects (Keller L, ed). Oxford: Oxford University Press; 45- 85.
  28. Reeve HK, Sherman PW, 1991. Intracolonial aggression and nepotism by the breeding female naked mole-rat. In: The biology of the naked mole-rat (Sherman FW, JarvisJUM, Alexander RD, eds). Princeton, New Jersey: Princeton University Press; 337-357.
  29. Rood JP, 1986. Ecology and social evolution in the mon- gooses. In: Ecological aspects of social evolution (Ru- benstein DI, Wrangham RW, eds). Princeton, New Jer- sey: Princeton University Press; 131-152.
  30. Ross KG, Matthews RW (eds), 1991. The social biology of wasps. Ithaca, New York: Cornell University Press.
  31. Rowley ICR, Russell E, 1990. Splendid fairy-wrens: dem- onstrating the importance of longevity. In: Cooperative breeding in birds: long-term studies of ecology and behavior (Stacey PB, Koenig WD, eds). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 1-30.
  32. SegerJ, 1991. Cooperation and conflict in social insects. In: Behavioural ecology: an evolutionary approach, 3rd ed (Krebs JR. Davies NB, eds). Oxford: Blackwell; 338- 373.
  33. SheUman-ReeveJS, in press. The spectrum of eusociality in termites. In: Social competition and cooperation in insects and arachnids, voL II. Evolution of sociality (Choe JC, Crespi BJ, eds). Princeton, New Jersey. Princeton University Press.
  34. Sherman PW, JarvisJUM, Alexander RD (eds), 1991. The biology of the naked mole-rat. Princeton, New Jersey: Princeton University Press.
  35. Shields WM, 1993. The natural and unnatural history of inbreeding and outbreeding. In: The natural history of inbreeding and outbreeding (Thornhill NW, ed). Chi- cago: University of Chicago Press; 143-169.
  36. Snowdon CT, Souti P, 1988. The tamarins, genus Sa- gubtus. In: Ecology and behavior of neotropical pri- mates, vol. 2 (Mhtermeier RA, Rylands AB, Coimbra- FUho AF, da Fonseca GAB, eds). Washington, DO World Wildlife Fund; 223-298.
  37. Strassmann JE. Queller DC, 1989. Ecological determi- nants of social evolution. In: The genetics of social evolution (Breed MD, Page RE Jr, eds). Boulder, Col- orado: Westview Press; 81-101.
  38. Turiuazzi S, 1991. The Stenogastrinae. In: The social biology of wasps (Ross KG, Matthews RW, eds). Ithaca, New York: Cornell University Press; 74-98.
  39. Vehrencamp SL, 1979. The roles of individual, kin, and group selection in the evolution of sociality. In: Hand- book of behavioral neurobiology, vol. 3. Social behavior and communication (Mirier P, Vandenbergh JG, eds). New York: Plenum Press; 351-394.
  40. Vehrencamp SL, Koford RR, Bowen BS, 1988. The ef- fects of breeding-unit size on fitness components in groove-billed anis. In: Reproductive success (Qutton- Brock TH, ed). Chicago: University of Chicago Press; 291-304.
  41. Wilson EO, 1971. The insect societies. Cambridge, Mas- sachusetts: Harvard University Press.
  42. Woolfenden GE, Fitzpatrick JW, 1984. The Florida scrub jay: demography of a cooperative-breeding bird. Princeton, New Jersey. Princeton University Press.
  43. Zahavi A, 1990. Arabian babblers: the quest for social status in a cooperative breeder. In: Cooperative breed- ing in birds: long-term studies of ecology and behavior (Stacey PB, Koenig WD, eds). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 103-130.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Sherman, P. W., Lacey, E. A., Reeve, H. K., & Keller, L.
Affiliations
  • Cornell University (US)
  • University of California, Davis (US)
  • University of Bern (CH)
Venue
Behavioral Ecology
Published
1995
Volume
6
Issue
1
Pages
102-108
ISSN
  • 1045-2249 (ISSN-L)
  • 1465-7279
OpenAlex
W2131058388
Cited by
312
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 12 · 2025: 7 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 10 · 2022: 12 · 2021: 12 · 2020: 8 · 2019: 7 · 2018: 7 · 2017: 17 · 2016: 9 · 2015: 12 · 2014: 13 · 2013: 14 · 2012: 11
FWCI
17.31
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Behavioral Ecology (publishedVersion)
  • SERVAL (Université de Lausanne) (publishedVersion, other-oa)
  • reroDoc Digital Library (submittedVersion)
  • IRIS (submittedVersion)
  • BORIS (University Library Bern) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
  • Open Access CRIS of the University of Bern
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics › Animal Behavior and Reproduction
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Insect and Arachnid Ecology and Behavior
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Evolutionary Game Theory and Cooperation
Keywords
eusociality, cooperative breeding, reproductive division of labor, alloparental care, kin selection, Hamilton's rule, social evolution, convergent evolution, reproductive variance, terminology, insects, birds, mammals

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review