CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 9Insect and Arachnid Ecology and BehaviorPhysiological and biochemical adaptationsPlant and animal studies

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 43 of the 43 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Metabolic rate shapes differences in foraging efficiency among honeybee foragers

Cassano, Julian, Naug, Dhruba·2022·Behavioral Ecology
DOI 10.1093/beheco/arac090
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Abstract

Metabolic rate is the rate at which organisms process energy and is often considered as the fundamental driver of life history processes. The link between metabolic rate and life history is critically mediated via foraging, which shapes the energy acquisition patterns of an individual. This predicts that individuals with different metabolic rates likely vary in their foraging strategies, although such a link has rarely been empirically investigated in the context of optimal foraging theory—a powerful framework for understanding how animals maximize their foraging returns. Many central place foragers such as honeybees maximize their energetic efficiency rather than the rate of energetic gain, given the critical role of energetic costs in foraging decisions. We therefore tested if individuals with low and high metabolic rates differ in efficiency maximization, using genetic lines of honeybees with different metabolic rates. Our results show that low metabolic rate foragers visit more flowers during a foraging trip and have a higher energetic efficiency than high metabolic rate foragers in both low and high resource conditions. We discuss the significance of these results in the context of division of labor and the adaptive role of phenotypic diversity in metabolic rate in a social insect colony.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1093/beheco/arac090

Cites

43 of 43 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Show all 43 references

Research works printed but not linked: 2

  1. Cassano, 2022, Data from: Metabolic rate shapes differences in foraging efficiency among honeybee foragers, Behav Ecol, 10.1093/beheco/arac090
  2. Chang, 2021, shiny: Web Application Framework for R. R package version 1.6.0

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Related

See all

Metadata

Authors
Cassano, J., & Naug, D.
Affiliations
Colorado State University (US)
Corresponding author
Naug, Dhruba
ORCID
Venue
Behavioral Ecology
Publisher
Oxford University Press (OUP)
Published
2022-09-28
Volume
33
Issue
6
Pages
1188-1195
ISSN
  • 1045-2249 (ISSN-L)
  • 1465-7279
DOI
10.1093/beheco/arac090
OpenAlex
W4297467707
Cited by
9
References
43
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 1
FWCI
1.21
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Licence
academic.oup.com/pages/standard-publication-reuse-rights (vor)
Locations
  • Behavioral Ecology (publishedVersion)
  • RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • National Science Foundation
  • Foundation for Food and Agriculture Research
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Insect Science › Insect and Arachnid Ecology and Behavior
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Ecology › Physiological and biochemical adaptations
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics › Plant and animal studies
Keywords
honey bee foraging, metabolic rate, foraging efficiency, energy efficiency, optimal foraging theory, central place foragers, division of labor, phenotypic diversity, genetic lines, social insects, energy acquisition

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review