Cited by 78Animal Behavior and ReproductionAvian ecology and behaviorAnimal Vocal Communication and Behavior

Effects of neighbor familiarity on reproductive success in the great tit (Parus major)

Grabowska-Zhang, Ada M., Wilkin, Teddy A., Sheldon, Ben C.·2012·Behavioral Ecology

Abstract

Social interactions can often affect the fitness of individuals. Territorial animals frequently interact with their neighbors, and long-term familiarity might lead to the development of cooperative relationships, which might influence the fitness of neighboring individuals. Here we test the hypothesis that familiarity with neighbors positively affects reproductive success in the great tit (Parus major). We used data from a 41 year long-term study of the great tit to quantify neighbor familiarity and its relationship with different stages in the great tit reproductive cycle. Breeding birds had from 0 to 11 neighbors with whom they were familiar by sharing a territory boundary the year before; although owing to low annual survival, the mean proportion of familiar neighbors (0.1) was quite small. Despite the low average proportion of familiar neighbors, we found evidence suggesting positive effects of increased familiarity: females with more familiar individuals in their neighborhood laid larger clutches. We also found that both males and females with more familiar neighbors had a greater chance of successfully fledging offspring. These results suggest that long-term familiarity can benefit territorial breeding birds. Future work is needed to address the underlying mechanisms of how neighbor familiarity influences individual fitness.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1093/beheco/arr189

Cites

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The positive influence of social familiarity on reproductive success has been shown for a variety of taxa.

    “The positive influence of social familiarity on reproductive success has been shown for a variety of taxa (Grabowska-Zhang et al., 2011; Martin and Shepherdson, 2012).”

    From Husbandry and enclosure influences on penguin behavior and conservation breeding (2016) · cites this paper as Grabowska-Zhang et al., 2011

    The Abstract reports evidence suggesting that familiar neighbors improve reproductive outcomes in great tits. The Introduction also reports a positive finding for male red-winged blackbirds, but says direct evidence is limited and describes null findings in other birds. It does not establish a positive reproductive effect across a variety of taxa. (LLM, conf=0.88)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

No references could be resolved yet.

Research works printed but not linked: 4

  1. Burnham KP, Anderson DR. 2002. Model selection and multimodel inference-a practical information-theoretic approach. 2nd ed. New York: Springer.
  2. Creel S, Macdonald D. 1995. Sociality, group-size, and reproductive suppression among carnivores. In: Slater PJB, Rosenblatt JS, Snowdon CT, Milinski M, editors. Advances in the study of behavior, vol. 24. San Diego (CA): Academic Press Inc. p. 203-257.
  3. Dormann CF, McPherson JM, Araujo MB, Bivand R, Bolliger J, Carl G, Davies RG, Hirzel A, Jetz W, Kissling WD, et al. 2007. Methods to account for spatial autocorrelation in the analysis of species distri- butional data: a review. Ecography. 30:609-628.
  4. Wilkin TA. 2006. Environmental effects on great tit life-histories [DPhil thesis]. [Oxford]: University of Oxford.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Grabowska-Zhang, A. M., Wilkin, T. A., & Sheldon, B. C.
Affiliations
University of Oxford (GB)
Corresponding author
Grabowska-Zhang, Ada M.
Venue
Behavioral Ecology
Published
2011-12-01
Volume
23
Issue
2
Pages
322-333
ISSN
  • 1045-2249 (ISSN-L)
  • 1465-7279
OpenAlex
W2123455912
Cited by
78
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 6 · 2022: 6 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 6 · 2019: 4 · 2018: 2 · 2017: 18 · 2016: 6 · 2015: 3 · 2014: 8 · 2013: 3 · 2012: 2
FWCI
4.45
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Behavioral Ecology (publishedVersion)
  • RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
Funders
Natural Environment Research Council (NE/D011744/1)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics › Animal Behavior and Reproduction
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Ecology › Avian ecology and behavior
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Developmental Biology › Animal Vocal Communication and Behavior
Keywords
reproductive success, Parus major, territoriality, social interaction, clutch size, fledging success, cooperative breeding, long-term research

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review