Effects of neighbor familiarity on reproductive success in the great tit (Parus major)
Abstract
Social interactions can often affect the fitness of individuals. Territorial animals frequently interact with their neighbors, and long-term familiarity might lead to the development of cooperative relationships, which might influence the fitness of neighboring individuals. Here we test the hypothesis that familiarity with neighbors positively affects reproductive success in the great tit (Parus major). We used data from a 41 year long-term study of the great tit to quantify neighbor familiarity and its relationship with different stages in the great tit reproductive cycle. Breeding birds had from 0 to 11 neighbors with whom they were familiar by sharing a territory boundary the year before; although owing to low annual survival, the mean proportion of familiar neighbors (0.1) was quite small. Despite the low average proportion of familiar neighbors, we found evidence suggesting positive effects of increased familiarity: females with more familiar individuals in their neighborhood laid larger clutches. We also found that both males and females with more familiar neighbors had a greater chance of successfully fledging offspring. These results suggest that long-term familiarity can benefit territorial breeding birds. Future work is needed to address the underlying mechanisms of how neighbor familiarity influences individual fitness.
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The positive influence of social familiarity on reproductive success has been shown for a variety of taxa.
“The positive influence of social familiarity on reproductive success has been shown for a variety of taxa (Grabowska-Zhang et al., 2011; Martin and Shepherdson, 2012).”
From Husbandry and enclosure influences on penguin behavior and conservation breeding (2016) · cites this paper as Grabowska-Zhang et al., 2011
The Abstract reports evidence suggesting that familiar neighbors improve reproductive outcomes in great tits. The Introduction also reports a positive finding for male red-winged blackbirds, but says direct evidence is limited and describes null findings in other birds. It does not establish a positive reproductive effect across a variety of taxa. (LLM, conf=0.88)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Cites
No references could be resolved yet.
Research works printed but not linked: 4
- Burnham KP, Anderson DR. 2002. Model selection and multimodel inference-a practical information-theoretic approach. 2nd ed. New York: Springer.
- Creel S, Macdonald D. 1995. Sociality, group-size, and reproductive suppression among carnivores. In: Slater PJB, Rosenblatt JS, Snowdon CT, Milinski M, editors. Advances in the study of behavior, vol. 24. San Diego (CA): Academic Press Inc. p. 203-257.
- Dormann CF, McPherson JM, Araujo MB, Bivand R, Bolliger J, Carl G, Davies RG, Hirzel A, Jetz W, Kissling WD, et al. 2007. Methods to account for spatial autocorrelation in the analysis of species distri- butional data: a review. Ecography. 30:609-628.
- Wilkin TA. 2006. Environmental effects on great tit life-histories [DPhil thesis]. [Oxford]: University of Oxford.
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Wiley, R. H. (2013) · Biological Reviews · doi:10.1111/j.1469-185x.2012.00246.x · Cited by 136 · see citing works
Husbandry and enclosure influences on penguin behavior and conservation breeding
Marshall, A. R., Deere, N. J., Little, H. A., Snipp, R., Goulder, J., & Mayer-Clarke, S. (2016) · Zoo Biology · doi:10.1002/zoo.21313 · Cited by 33 · see citing works
- Authors
- Grabowska-Zhang, A. M., Wilkin, T. A., & Sheldon, B. C.
- Affiliations
- University of Oxford (GB)
- Corresponding author
- Grabowska-Zhang, Ada M.
- ORCID
- Sheldon, Ben C.
- Venue
- Behavioral Ecology
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 2011-12-01
- Volume
- 23
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 322-333
- ISSN
- 1045-2249 (ISSN-L)
- 1465-7279
- OpenAlex
- W2123455912
- Cited by
- 78
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 2 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 6 · 2022: 6 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 6 · 2019: 4 · 2018: 2 · 2017: 18 · 2016: 6 · 2015: 3 · 2014: 8 · 2013: 3 · 2012: 2
- FWCI
- 4.45
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Behavioral Ecology (publishedVersion)
- RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
- Funders
- Natural Environment Research Council (NE/D011744/1)
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics › Animal Behavior and Reproduction
- Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Ecology › Avian ecology and behavior
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Developmental Biology › Animal Vocal Communication and Behavior
- Keywords
- reproductive success, Parus major, territoriality, social interaction, clutch size, fledging success, cooperative breeding, long-term research
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review