Cited by 124Wildlife Ecology and ConservationAnimal Ecology and Behavior StudiesWildlife-Road Interactions and Conservation

Context dependence of risk effects: wolves and tree logs create patches of fear in an old-growth forest

Open access
Kuijper, Dries P.J., Bubnicki, Jakub W., Churski, Marcin, Mols, Bjorn, van Hooft, Pim·2015·Behavioral Ecology

Abstract

Large mammalian carnivores create areas perceived as having high and low risk by their ungulate prey. Human activities can indirectly shape this landscape of fear by altering behavior and spatial distribution of carnivores. We studied how red deer perceive the landscape of fear in an old-growth forest system (Białowieża Primeval Forest, Poland) both at large and fine spatial scale. Camera traps were placed at locations with and without tree logs (fine-scale risk factor) and at different distances from the core of a Wolf territory and human settlements (large-scale risk factor). Red deer avoided coming close to large tree logs and increased their vigilance levels when they were present in close vicinity. The strength of these effects depended on the distance to the Wolf core area; deer perceived tree logs as more risky when wolves were more often present. Hence, tree logs inside Wolf core areas create fine-scale patches of fear with reduced deer browsing pressure, thereby enhancing chances for successful tree recruitment. Human presence shapes this landscape of fear as Wolf core areas are located far from human settlements. This "human shadow" on predator-prey interactions is therefore an important component that should be taken into account in human-dominated landscapes.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1093/beheco/arv107

Cites

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • In this situation, even small, localized reductions in browsing intensity, such as those provided by fallen trees, can facilitate the growth of young aspen.

    “In this situation, even small, localized reductions in browsing intensity, such as those provided by fallen trees, can facilitate the growth of young aspen (Beschta et al., 2018, 2020; Kuijper et al., 2015; Ripple & Larsen, 2001).”

    From Bison alter the northern Yellowstone ecosystem by breaking aspen saplings (2023) · cites this paper as Kuijper et al., 2015

    The available passages are bibliographic metadata (labelled Abstract, no page number). The title mentions tree logs, but no passage addresses reduced browsing or the growth of young aspen. Searches for fallen trees, browsing, regeneration, and aspen found no relevant passage. (LLM, conf=0.72)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

No citation lists for this paper

No citation lists for this paper yet — checked again daily.

References 59 · Cited by 124

Authors
Kuijper, D. P. J., Bubnicki, J. W., Churski, M., Mols, B., & van Hooft, P.
Affiliations
Mammal Research Institute (PL)
Venue
Behavioral Ecology
Published
2015
Volume
26
Issue
6
Pages
1558-1568
ISSN
  • 1045-2249 (ISSN-L)
  • 1465-7279
OpenAlex
W2173107089
Cited by
124
References
59
Citations by year
2026: 6 · 2025: 11 · 2024: 21 · 2023: 6 · 2022: 20 · 2021: 8 · 2020: 16 · 2019: 12 · 2018: 13 · 2017: 5 · 2016: 6
FWCI
7.25
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Behavioral Ecology (publishedVersion)
  • Socio-Environmental Systems Modeling (acceptedVersion)
  • RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
  • Data Archiving and Networked Services (DANS) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Ecology › Wildlife Ecology and Conservation
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Ecology › Animal Ecology and Behavior Studies
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Ecology › Wildlife-Road Interactions and Conservation
Keywords
landscape of fear, red deer, wolf, old-growth forest, predator-prey interactions, vigilance behavior, browsing pressure, tree recruitment, human settlement, Białowieża Primeval Forest

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review