Deep fusion learning facilitates anatomical therapeutic chemical recognition in drug repurposing and discovery
Abstract
The advent of large-scale biomedical data and computational algorithms provides new opportunities for drug repurposing and discovery. It is of great interest to find an appropriate data representation and modeling method to facilitate these studies. The anatomical therapeutic chemical (ATC) classification system, proposed by the World Health Organization (WHO), is an essential source of information for drug repurposing and discovery. Besides, computational methods are applied to predict drug ATC classification. We conducted a systematic review of ATC computational prediction studies and revealed the differences in data sets, data representation, algorithm approaches, and evaluation metrics. We then proposed a deep fusion learning (DFL) framework to optimize the ATC prediction model, namely DeepATC. The methods based on graph convolutional network, inferring biological network and multimodel attentive fusion network were applied in DeepATC to extract the molecular topological information and low-dimensional representation from the molecular graph and heterogeneous biological networks. The results indicated that DeepATC achieved superior model performance with area under the curve (AUC) value at 0.968. Furthermore, the DFL framework was performed for the transcriptome data–based ATC prediction, as well as another independent task that is significantly relevant to drug discovery, namely drug–target interaction. The DFL-based model achieved excellent performance in the above-extended validation task, suggesting that the idea of aggregating the heterogeneous biological network and node’s (molecule or protein) self-topological features will bring inspiration for broader drug repurposing and discovery research.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Attention-based fusion methods can weight different latent features by their importance.
“In addition to element-wise aggregation, attention-based fusion methods can be applied in order to weight different latent features by their importance [74, 79, 81].”
From Multimodal deep learning for biomedical data fusion: a review (2022) · cites this paper as [81]
Cites
From machine learning to deep learning: progress in machine intelligence for rational drug discovery
Zhang, L., Tan, J., Han, D., & Zhu, H. (2017) · Drug Discovery Today · doi:10.1016/j.drudis.2017.08.010 · Cited by 760 · see citing works
Graph Convolutional Neural Networks for Predicting Drug-Target Interactions
Torng, W., & Altman, R. B. (2019) · Journal of Chemical Information and Modeling · doi:10.1021/acs.jcim.9b00628 · Cited by 371 · see citing works
A review of network-based approaches to drug repositioning
Lotfi Shahreza, M., Ghadiri, N., Mousavi, S. R., Varshosaz, J., & Green, J. R. (2018) · Briefings in Bioinformatics · doi:10.1093/bib/bbx017 · Cited by 330 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Multimodal deep learning for biomedical data fusion: a review
Stahlschmidt, S. R., Ulfenborg, B., & Synnergren, J. (2022) · Briefings in Bioinformatics · doi:10.1093/bib/bbab569 · Cited by 766 · see citing works
“In addition to element-wise aggregation, attention-based fusion methods can be applied in order to weight different latent features by their importance [74, 79, 81].”
Method
- Authors
- Wang, X., Liu, M., Zhang, Y., He, S., Qin, C., Li, Y., & Lu, T.
- Affiliations
- Beijing University of Chinese Medicine (CN)
- Corresponding author
- Li, Yu
- Lu, Tao
- Venue
- Briefings in Bioinformatics
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 2021-08-06
- Volume
- 22
- Issue
- 6
- ISSN
- 1467-5463 (ISSN-L)
- 1477-4054
- OpenAlex
- W3192945554
- Cited by
- 16
- References
- 3
- Citations by year
- 2026: 3 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 1
- FWCI
- 1.05
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Licence
- academic.oup.com/journals/pages/open_access/funder_policies/chorus/standard_publication_model (vor)
- Locations
- Briefings in Bioinformatics (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- Beijing Municipal Commission of Education (100062520537)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computational Theory and Mathematics › Computational Drug Discovery Methods
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Bioinformatics and Genomic Networks
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Biomedical Text Mining and Ontologies
- Keywords
- ATC classification, drug repurposing, drug discovery, graph convolutional networks, heterogeneous biological networks, molecular graphs, drug-target interaction prediction
- MeSH terms
- Deep Learning, Algorithms, Models, Chemical, Proteins, Drug Discovery, Drug Repositioning, Databases, Chemical
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review