Cited by 32Machine Learning in BioinformaticsProtein Structure and DynamicsComputational Drug Discovery Methods

Predicting protein–membrane interfaces of peripheral membrane proteins using ensemble machine learning

Open access
Chatzigoulas, Alexios, Cournia, Zoe·2022·Briefings in Bioinformatics

Published version of a preprint

Abstract

Abnormal protein–membrane attachment is involved in deregulated cellular pathways and in disease. Therefore, the possibility to modulate protein–membrane interactions represents a new promising therapeutic strategy for peripheral membrane proteins that have been considered so far undruggable. A major obstacle in this drug design strategy is that the membrane-binding domains of peripheral membrane proteins are usually unknown. The development of fast and efficient algorithms predicting the protein–membrane interface would shed light into the accessibility of membrane–protein interfaces by drug-like molecules. Herein, we describe an ensemble machine learning methodology and algorithm for predicting membrane-penetrating amino acids. We utilize available experimental data from the literature for training 21 machine learning classifiers and meta-classifiers. Evaluation of the best ensemble classifier model accuracy yields a macro-averaged F1 score = 0.92 and a Matthews correlation coefficient = 0.84 for predicting correctly membrane-penetrating amino acids on unknown proteins of a validation set. The python code for predicting protein–membrane interfaces of peripheral membrane proteins is available at https://github.com/zoecournia/DREAMM.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1093/bib/bbab518

Cites

5 of 5 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Chatzigoulas, A., & Cournia, Z.
Affiliations
  • National and Kapodistrian University of Athens (GR)
  • Academy of Athens (GR)
Corresponding author
Cournia, Zoe
Venue
Briefings in Bioinformatics
Published
2022-02-12
Volume
23
Issue
2
ISSN
  • 1467-5463 (ISSN-L)
  • 1477-4054
OpenAlex
W4221033961
Cited by
32
References
5
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 9 · 2023: 9 · 2022: 7
FWCI
1.95
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Briefings in Bioinformatics (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc)
  • bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) (acceptedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • State Scholarships Foundation (ΙΚΥ, MIS-5000432)
  • Hellenic Foundation for Research and Innovation (1780)
  • National Infrastructures for Research and Technology (pr008033_gpu-Mem-Surf, pr008033_thin-Mem-Surf, pr009022_gpu-Mem-Surf)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Machine Learning in Bioinformatics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Protein Structure and Dynamics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computational Theory and Mathematics › Computational Drug Discovery Methods
Keywords
peripheral membrane proteins, ensemble learning, meta-classifier, undruggable targets
MeSH terms
Machine Learning, Algorithms, Amino Acids, Membrane Proteins

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review