Capturing large genomic contexts for accurately predicting enhancer-promoter interactions
Open accessPublished version of a preprint
Abstract
Enhancer-promoter interaction (EPI) is a key mechanism underlying gene regulation. EPI prediction has always been a challenging task because enhancers could regulate promoters of distant target genes. Although many machine learning models have been developed, they leverage only the features in enhancers and promoters, or simply add the average genomic signals in the regions between enhancers and promoters, without utilizing detailed features between or outside enhancers and promoters. Due to a lack of large-scale features, existing methods could achieve only moderate performance, especially for predicting EPIs in different cell types. Here, we present a Transformer-based model, TransEPI, for EPI prediction by capturing large genomic contexts. TransEPI was developed based on EPI datasets derived from Hi-C or ChIA-PET data in six cell lines. To avoid over-fitting, we evaluated the TransEPI model by testing it on independent test datasets where the cell line and chromosome are different from the training data. TransEPI not only achieved consistent performance across the cross-validation and test datasets from different cell types but also outperformed the state-of-the-art machine learning and deep learning models. In addition, we found that the improved performance of TransEPI was attributed to the integration of large genomic contexts. Lastly, TransEPI was extended to study the non-coding mutations associated with brain disorders or neural diseases, and we found that TransEPI was also useful for predicting the target genes of non-coding mutations.
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
No citation lists for this paper
No citation lists for this paper yet — checked again daily.
References 76 · Cited by 33
- Authors
- Chen, K., Zhao, H., & Yang, Y.
- Affiliations
- Sun Yat-sen University (CN)
- Corresponding author
- Yang, Yuedong
- Venue
- Briefings in Bioinformatics
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 2022-01-22
- Volume
- 23
- Issue
- 2
- ISSN
- 1467-5463 (ISSN-L)
- 1477-4054
- OpenAlex
- W4205731547
- Cited by
- 33
- References
- 76
- Citations by year
- 2026: 3 · 2025: 7 · 2024: 14 · 2023: 8 · 2022: 1
- FWCI
- 1.80
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- doi.org
- Licence
- Locations
- Briefings in Bioinformatics (publishedVersion)
- bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) (acceptedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Griffith Research Online (submittedVersion, other-oa)
- Funders
- National Key Research and Development Program of China (2020YFB0204803)
- National Natural Science Foundation of China (61772566)
- Guangdong Key Field R&D Plan (2019B020228001, 2018B010109006)
- Introducing Innovative and Entrepreneurial Teams (2016ZT06D211)
- Guangzhou Science and Technology Research Plan (202007030010)
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Genomics and Chromatin Dynamics
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Cancer Research › Cancer-related molecular mechanisms research
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Genetic Associations and Epidemiology
- Keywords
- enhancer-promoter interactions, transformer models, Hi-C, ChIA-PET, non-coding mutations, brain disorders, neurological disorders, target gene prediction, gene expression regulation
- MeSH terms
- Machine Learning, Cell Line, Enhancer Elements, Genetic, Promoter Regions, Genetic, Genomics
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review