DTSyn: a dual-transformer-based neural network to predict synergistic drug combinations
Open accessPublished version of a preprint
Abstract
Drug combination therapies are superior to monotherapy for cancer treatment in many ways. Identifying novel drug combinations by screening is challenging for the wet-lab experiments due to the time-consuming process of the enormous search space of possible drug pairs. Thus, computational methods have been developed to predict drug pairs with potential synergistic functions. Notwithstanding the success of current models, understanding the mechanism of drug synergy from a chemical–gene–tissue interaction perspective lacks study, hindering current algorithms from drug mechanism study. Here, we proposed a deep neural network model termed DTSyn (Dual Transformer encoder model for drug pair Synergy prediction) based on a multi-head attention mechanism to identify novel drug combinations. We designed a fine-granularity transformer encoder to capture chemical substructure–gene and gene–gene associations and a coarse-granularity transformer encoder to extract chemical–chemical and chemical–cell line interactions. DTSyn achieved the highest receiver operating characteristic area under the curve of 0.73, 0.78. 0.82 and 0.81 on four different cross-validation tasks, outperforming all competing methods. Further, DTSyn achieved the best True Positive Rate (TPR) over five independent data sets. The ablation study showed that both transformer encoder blocks contributed to the performance of DTSyn. In addition, DTSyn can extract interactions among chemicals and cell lines, representing the potential mechanisms of drug action. By leveraging the attention mechanism and pretrained gene embeddings, DTSyn shows improved interpretability ability. Thus, we envision our model as a valuable tool to prioritize synergistic drug pairs with chemical and cell line gene expression profile.
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Cites
Highly accurate protein structure prediction with AlphaFold
Jumper, J., Evans, R., Pritzel, A., Green, T., Figurnov, M., Ronneberger, O., Tunyasuvunakool, K., Bates, R., Žídek, A., Potapenko, A., et al. (2021) · Nature · doi:10.1038/s41586-021-03819-2 · Cited by 43,764 · see citing works
node2vec: Scalable Feature Learning for Networks
Grover, A., & Leskovec, J. (2016) · Proceedings of the 22nd ACM SIGKDD International Conference on Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining · doi:10.1145/2939672.2939754 · Cited by 10,926 · see citing works
Transformers: State-of-the-Art Natural Language Processing
Wolf, T., Debut, L., Sanh, V., Chaumond, J., Delangue, C., Moi, A., Cistac, P., Rault, T., Louf, R., Funtowicz, M., et al. (2020) · Proceedings of the 2020 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing: System Demonstrations · doi:10.18653/v1/2020.emnlp-demos.6 · Cited by 8,741 · see citing works
A Next Generation Connectivity Map: L1000 Platform and the First 1,000,000 Profiles
Subramanian, A., Narayan, R., Corsello, S. M., Peck, D. D., Natoli, T. E., Lu, X., Gould, J., Davis, J. F., Tubelli, A. A., Asiedu, J. K., et al. (2017) · Cell · doi:10.1016/j.cell.2017.10.049 · Cited by 3,515 · see citing works
Self-citationNext-generation characterization of the Cancer Cell Line Encyclopedia
Ghandi, M., Huang, F. W., Jané-Valbuena, J., Kryukov, G. V., Lo, C. C., McDonald, E. R., Barretina, J., Gelfand, E. T., Bielski, C. M., Li, H., et al. (2019) · Nature · doi:10.1038/s41586-019-1186-3 · Cited by 3,394 · see citing works
Small molecules, big targets: drug discovery faces the protein–protein interaction challenge
Scott, D. E., Bayly, A. R., Abell, C., & Skidmore, J. (2016) · Nature Reviews Drug Discovery · doi:10.1038/nrd.2016.29 · Cited by 1,137 · see citing works
Searching for Drug Synergy in Complex Dose–Response Landscapes Using an Interaction Potency Model
Yadav, B., Wennerberg, K., Aittokallio, T., & Tang, J. (2015) · Computational and Structural Biotechnology Journal · doi:10.1016/j.csbj.2015.09.001 · Cited by 845 · see citing works
Oncogenic protein interfaces: small molecules, big challenges
Nero, T. L., Morton, C. J., Holien, J. K., Wielens, J., & Parker, M. W. (2014) · Nature Reviews Cancer · doi:10.1038/nrc3690 · Cited by 312 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
- Authors
- Hu, J., Gao, J., Fang, X., Liu, Z., Wang, F., Huang, W., Wu, H., & Zhao, G.
- Affiliations
- Baidu (China) (CN)
- HWL Consulting LLC , 3328 Antigua Dr, 97408, Oregon, US
- Corresponding author
- Zhao, Guodong
- Venue
- Briefings in Bioinformatics
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 2022-08-01
- Volume
- 23
- Issue
- 5
- ISSN
- 1467-5463 (ISSN-L)
- 1477-4054
- OpenAlex
- W4289315841
- Cited by
- 65
- References
- 8
- Citations by year
- 2026: 9 · 2025: 35 · 2024: 12 · 2023: 8 · 2022: 1
- FWCI
- 7.58
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- doi.org
- Licence
- academic.oup.com/journals/pages/open_access/funder_policies/chorus/standard_publication_model (vor)
- Locations
- Briefings in Bioinformatics (publishedVersion)
- bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) (acceptedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computational Theory and Mathematics › Computational Drug Discovery Methods
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Bioinformatics and Genomic Networks
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Biomedical Text Mining and Ontologies
- Keywords
- drug synergy prediction, synergistic drug combination, multi-head attention, combination cancer therapy, chemical-gene interactions, gene-gene interaction, gene embeddings, interpretability
- MeSH terms
- Algorithms, Drug Combinations, ROC Curve, Neural Networks, Computer, Computational Biology
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review