A deep learning-based method for the prediction of DNA interacting residues in a protein
Open accessPublished version of a preprint
Abstract
DNA–protein interaction is one of the most crucial interactions in the biological system, which decides the fate of many processes such as transcription, regulation and splicing of genes. In this study, we trained our models on a training dataset of 646 DNA-binding proteins having 15 636 DNA interacting and 298 503 non-interacting residues. Our trained models were evaluated on an independent dataset of 46 DNA-binding proteins having 965 DNA interacting and 9911 non-interacting residues. All proteins in the independent dataset have less than 30% of sequence similarity with proteins in the training dataset. A wide range of traditional machine learning and deep learning (1D-CNN) techniques-based models have been developed using binary, physicochemical properties and Position-Specific Scoring Matrix (PSSM)/evolutionary profiles. In the case of machine learning technique, eXtreme Gradient Boosting-based model achieved a maximum area under the receiver operating characteristics (AUROC) curve of 0.77 on the independent dataset using PSSM profile. Deep learning-based model achieved the highest AUROC of 0.79 on the independent dataset using a combination of all three profiles. We evaluated the performance of existing methods on the independent dataset and observed that our proposed method outperformed all the existing methods. In order to facilitate scientific community, we developed standalone software and web server, which are accessible from https://webs.iiitd.edu.in/raghava/dbpred.
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Cites
Highly accurate protein structure prediction with AlphaFold
Jumper, J., Evans, R., Pritzel, A., Green, T., Figurnov, M., Ronneberger, O., Tunyasuvunakool, K., Bates, R., Žídek, A., Potapenko, A., et al. (2021) · Nature · doi:10.1038/s41586-021-03819-2 · Cited by 43,764 · see citing works
Burley, S. K., Bhikadiya, C., Bi, C., Bittrich, S., Chen, L., Crichlow, G. V., Christie, C. H., Dalenberg, K., Di Costanzo, L., Duarte, J. M., et al. (2021) · Nucleic Acids Research · doi:10.1093/nar/gkaa1038 · Cited by 1,581 · see citing works
AlphaFold2-aware protein–DNA binding site prediction using graph transformer
Yuan, Q., Chen, S., Rao, J., Zheng, S., Zhao, H., & Yang, Y. (2022) · Briefings in Bioinformatics · doi:10.1093/bib/bbab564 · Cited by 137 · see citing works
An overview of the prediction of protein DNA-binding sites
Si, J., Zhao, R., & Wu, R. (2015) · International Journal of Molecular Sciences · doi:10.3390/ijms16035194 · Cited by 91 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
- Authors
- Patiyal, S., Dhall, A., & Raghava, G. P. S.
- Affiliations
- Indraprastha Institute of Information Technology Delhi (IN)
- Corresponding author
- Raghava, Gajendra P S
- Venue
- Briefings in Bioinformatics
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 2022-08-08
- Volume
- 23
- Issue
- 5
- ISSN
- 1467-5463 (ISSN-L)
- 1477-4054
- OpenAlex
- W4296472808
- Cited by
- 38
- References
- 4
- Citations by year
- 2026: 5 · 2025: 14 · 2024: 12 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 2
- FWCI
- 2.68
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- doi.org
- Licence
- academic.oup.com/journals/pages/open_access/funder_policies/chorus/standard_publication_model (vor)
- Locations
- Briefings in Bioinformatics (publishedVersion)
- bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) (acceptedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- Department of Biotechnology, Ministry of Science and Technology, India
- Department of Science and Technology, Ministry of Science and Technology, India
- Indian Institute of Technology Delhi
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Machine Learning in Bioinformatics
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Protein Structure and Dynamics
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Genomics and Chromatin Dynamics
- Keywords
- DNA-binding proteins, protein-DNA interactions, position weight matrices, evolutionary profiles, physicochemical properties, extreme gradient boosting, 1D convolutional neural network
- MeSH terms
- Deep Learning, DNA, DNA-Binding Proteins, Databases, Protein, Position-Specific Scoring Matrices
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review