Cited by 25Protein Structure and DynamicsMachine Learning in BioinformaticsEnzyme Structure and Function

Improved model quality assessment using sequence and structural information by enhanced deep neural networks

Open access
Liu, Jun, Zhao, Kailong, Zhang, Guijun·2023·Briefings in Bioinformatics

Published version of a preprint

Abstract

Protein model quality assessment plays an important role in protein structure prediction, protein design and drug discovery. In this work, DeepUMQA2, a substantially improved version of DeepUMQA for protein model quality assessment, is proposed. First, sequence features containing protein co-evolution information and structural features reflecting family information are extracted to complement model-dependent features. Second, a novel backbone network based on triangular multiplication update and axial attention mechanism is designed to enhance information exchange between inter-residue pairs. On CASP13 and CASP14 datasets, the performance of DeepUMQA2 increases by 20.5 and 20.4% compared with DeepUMQA, respectively (measured by top 1 loss). Moreover, on the three-month CAMEO dataset (11 March to 04 June 2022), DeepUMQA2 outperforms DeepUMQA by 15.5% (measured by local AUC0,0.2) and ranks first among all competing server methods in CAMEO blind test. Experimental results show that DeepUMQA2 outperforms state-of-the-art model quality assessment methods, such as ProQ3D-LDDT, ModFOLD8, and DeepAccNet and DeepUMQA2 can select more suitable best models than state-of-the-art protein structure methods, such as AlphaFold2, RoseTTAFold and I-TASSER, provided themselves.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1093/bib/bbac507

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Liu, J., Zhao, K., & Zhang, G.
Affiliations
Zhejiang University of Technology (CN)
Corresponding author
Zhang, Guijun
Venue
Briefings in Bioinformatics
Published
2022-12-02
Volume
24
Issue
1
ISSN
  • 1467-5463 (ISSN-L)
  • 1477-4054
OpenAlex
W4310638956
Cited by
25
References
2
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 13
FWCI
1.88
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Briefings in Bioinformatics (publishedVersion)
  • bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) (acceptedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • Natural Science Foundation of China (LZ20F030002)
  • National Natural Science Foundation of China (61773346, 62173304)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Protein Structure and Dynamics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Machine Learning in Bioinformatics
  • Physical Sciences › Materials Science › Materials Chemistry › Enzyme Structure and Function
Keywords
protein structure prediction, backbone networks, model selection
MeSH terms
Algorithms, Models, Molecular, Protein Conformation, Proteins, Neural Networks, Computer, Computational Biology

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review