Integrative analysis of multi-omics and imaging data with incorporation of biological information via structural Bayesian factor analysis
Open accessAbstract
MOTIVATION: With the rapid development of modern technologies, massive data are available for the systematic study of Alzheimer's disease (AD). Though many existing AD studies mainly focus on single-modality omics data, multi-omics datasets can provide a more comprehensive understanding of AD. To bridge this gap, we proposed a novel structural Bayesian factor analysis framework (SBFA) to extract the information shared by multi-omics data through the aggregation of genotyping data, gene expression data, neuroimaging phenotypes and prior biological network knowledge. Our approach can extract common information shared by different modalities and encourage biologically related features to be selected, guiding future AD research in a biologically meaningful way. METHOD: Our SBFA model decomposes the mean parameters of the data into a sparse factor loading matrix and a factor matrix, where the factor matrix represents the common information extracted from multi-omics and imaging data. Our framework is designed to incorporate prior biological network information. Our simulation study demonstrated that our proposed SBFA framework could achieve the best performance compared with the other state-of-the-art factor-analysis-based integrative analysis methods. RESULTS: We apply our proposed SBFA model together with several state-of-the-art factor analysis models to extract the latent common information from genotyping, gene expression and brain imaging data simultaneously from the ADNI biobank database. The latent information is then used to predict the functional activities questionnaire score, an important measurement for diagnosis of AD quantifying subjects' abilities in daily life. Our SBFA model shows the best prediction performance compared with the other factor analysis models. AVAILABILITY: Code are publicly available at https://github.com/JingxuanBao/SBFA. CONTACT: qlong@upenn.edu.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
SCCA has revealed immune-related expression patterns in RNA-Seq datasets from specific brain regions, offering biologically interpretable insights into disease progression.
“For instance, SCCA has revealed immune-related expression patterns in RNA-Seq datasets from specific brain regions, offering biologically interpretable insights into disease progression279, 280, 281.”
From Artificial intelligence-driven multi-omics approaches in Alzheimer's disease: Progress, challenges, and future directions (2025) · cites this paper as [281]
Cites
Toward understanding the origin and evolution of cellular organisms
Kanehisa, M. (2019) · Protein Science · doi:10.1002/pro.3715 · Cited by 5,509 · see citing works
Murray, M. E., Graff-Radford, N. R., Ross, O. A., Petersen, R. C., Duara, R., & Dickson, D. W. (2011) · The Lancet Neurology · doi:10.1016/s1474-4422(11)70156-9 · Cited by 972 · see citing works
Pattern discovery and cancer gene identification in integrated cancer genomic data
Mo, Q., Wang, S., Seshan, V. E., Olshen, A. B., Schultz, N., Sander, C., Powers, R. S., Ladanyi, M., & Shen, R. (2013) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.1208949110 · Cited by 474 · see citing works
Neff, R. A., Wang, M., Vatansever, S., Guo, L., Ming, C., Wang, Q., Wang, E., Horgusluoglu-Moloch, E., Song, W.-M., Li, A., et al. (2021) · Science Advances · doi:10.1126/sciadv.abb5398 · Cited by 306 · cited 1× · see citing works
“Some existing AD studies applied factor analysis models trying to define AD subtypes solely in terms of neuropathology [27, 28], molecular signatures [29, 30] or solely through imaging phenotype [31, 32].”
Method
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Ren, F., Wei, J., Chen, Q., Hu, M., Yu, L., Mi, J., Zhou, X., Qin, D., Wu, J., & Wu, A. (2025) · Acta Pharmaceutica Sinica B · doi:10.1016/j.apsb.2025.07.030 · Cited by 97 · see citing works
- Authors
- Bao, J., Chang, C., Zhang, Q., Saykin, A. J., Shen, L., Long, Q., & Initiative, F. T. A. D. N.
- Affiliations
- University of Pennsylvania (US)
- Indiana University School of Medicine (US)
- Corresponding author
- Bao, Jingxuan
- Chang, Changgee
- Venue
- Briefings in Bioinformatics
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 2023-03
- Volume
- 24
- Issue
- 2
- ISSN
- 1467-5463 (ISSN-L)
- 1477-4054
- PMC
- PMC10387302
- OpenAlex
- W4323350075
- Cited by
- 16
- References
- 4
- Citations by year
- 2026: 4 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 2
- FWCI
- 1.43
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
- doi.org
- Licence
- academic.oup.com/journals/pages/open_access/funder_policies/chorus/standard_publication_model (vor)
- Locations
- Briefings in Bioinformatics (publishedVersion)
- PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- IUScholarWorks (Indiana University) (submittedVersion)
- Funders
- NIH (RF1AG063481, R01AG071174, R01 AG071470, U01 AG066833, U01 AG068057, U01AG024904)
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Bioinformatics and Genomic Networks
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Dementia and Cognitive Impairment Research
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Alzheimer's disease research and treatments
- Keywords
- Alzheimer's disease, multi-omics integration, gene expression, genotyping, neuroimaging, Functional Activities Questionnaire, ADNI
- MeSH terms
- Multiomics, Bayes Theorem, Brain, Phenotype, Neuroimaging
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review