Cited by 2Protein Structure and DynamicsMachine Learning in BioinformaticsGenomics and Rare Diseases

Data-efficient protein mutational effect prediction with weak supervision by molecular simulation and protein language models

Open access
Deguchi, Teppei, Ab Ghani, Nur Syatila, Kurumida, Yoichi, Iida, Shinji, Kobayashi, Kaito, Saito, Yutaka·2025·Briefings in Bioinformatics

Published version of a preprint

Abstract

Machine learning-based protein mutational effect prediction is widely used in protein engineering and pathogenicity prediction, but training data scarcity remains a major challenge due to high costs of experimental measurements. A previous study proposed data augmentation using computational estimates by molecular simulation. However, this approach has been limited to predicting mutational effects on thermostability. Here, we present a new data augmentation method that combines molecular simulation with zero-shot prediction computed by protein language models. These computational estimates serve as ‘weak’ training data to supplement experimental training data. Our method dynamically adjusts the weight and inclusion of weak training data based on available experimental training data. This reduces potential negative impacts of weak training data while extending applicability to diverse protein properties such as binding affinity and enzymatic activity. Benchmark tests demonstrate that our method improves prediction accuracy particularly when experimental training data are scarce. These results indicate the capability of our approach to advance protein engineering and pathogenicity prediction in small data regimes.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1093/bib/bbaf536

Cites

4 of 4 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Authors
Deguchi, T., Ab Ghani, N. S., Kurumida, Y., Iida, S., Kobayashi, K., & Saito, Y.
Affiliations
  • Artificial Intelligence Research Center (JP)
  • School of Frontier Engineering, Kitasato University , 1-15-1 Kitazato, Minami-ku, Sagamihara, Kanagawa 252-0373 ,
  • Kitasato University (JP)
  • Graduate School of Frontier Sciences, The University of Tokyo , 5-1-5, Kashiwanoha, Kashiwa, Chiba 277-0882 ,
Venue
Briefings in Bioinformatics
Published
2025-08-31
Volume
26
Issue
5
ISSN
  • 1467-5463 (ISSN-L)
  • 1477-4054
OpenAlex
W4415046037
Cited by
2
References
4
Citations by year
2026: 2
FWCI
0.60
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Briefings in Bioinformatics (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) (acceptedVersion, cc-by)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • JSPS (22H03691)
  • AMED (JP19ak0101122)
  • NEDO (JPNP14004)
  • JACI Prize for Encouraging Young Researcher
  • JST SPRING (JPMJSP2108)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Protein Structure and Dynamics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Machine Learning in Bioinformatics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Genomics and Rare Diseases
Keywords
weakly supervised learning, data augmentation, molecular simulation, protein language models, zero-shot prediction, data scarcity, protein thermal stability, binding affinity prediction, pathogenicity prediction, protein engineering
MeSH terms
Machine Learning, Mutation, Proteins, Computational Biology, Molecular Dynamics Simulation

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review