Data-driven strategies for drug repurposing: insights, recommendations, and case studies
Open accessPublished version of a preprint
Abstract
Drug discovery is a complex, time-intensive, and costly process, often requiring more than a decade and substantial financial investment to bring a single therapeutic to market. Drug repurposing, the systematic identification of new indications for existing approved drugs, offers a cost-effective and expedited alternative to traditional pipelines, with the potential to address unmet clinical needs. In this study, we present a comparative analysis of drug–target interaction data from three extensively curated resources: ChEMBL, BindingDB, and GtoPdb, evaluating their release histories, curation methodologies, and coverage of approved and investigational compounds and targets. To facilitate therapeutic interpretation, we manually classified ChEMBL targets into 12 high-level biological families and mapped 817 clinically approved drug indications into 28 broader therapeutic groups. This structured framework enabled a systematic profiling of physicochemical properties among approved drugs across therapeutic categories. Our analyses revealed associations between physicochemical characteristics and therapeutic groups, providing practical guidance for indication-specific compound prioritization and refining the repurposing studies. We also examined cross-indication drug approvals to identify areas with high repurposing potential. Finally, we implemented a pathway-based computational pipeline to predict repositioning opportunities for FDA-approved drugs across 10 major cancer types, demonstrating its adaptability to other disease contexts. Overall, this work consolidates drug-target data and computational repurposing into a data-driven framework that advances drug discovery and translational applications.
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Cites
Highly accurate protein structure prediction with AlphaFold
Jumper, J., Evans, R., Pritzel, A., Green, T., Figurnov, M., Ronneberger, O., Tunyasuvunakool, K., Bates, R., Žídek, A., Potapenko, A., et al. (2021) · Nature · doi:10.1038/s41586-021-03819-2 · Cited by 43,764 · see citing works
Evolutionary-scale prediction of atomic level protein structure with a language model
Lin, Z., Akin, H., Rao, R., Hie, B., Zhu, Z., Lu, W., Smetanin, N., Verkuil, R., Kabeli, O., Shmueli, Y., et al. (2022) · doi:10.1101/2022.07.20.500902 · Cited by 5,523 · see citing works
Network-based in silico drug efficacy screening
Guney, E., Menche, J., Vidal, M., & Barábasi, A.-L. (2016) · Nature Communications · doi:10.1038/ncomms10331 · Cited by 625 · see citing works
Exploration of databases and methods supporting drug repurposing: a comprehensive survey
Tanoli, Z., Seemab, U., Scherer, A., Wennerberg, K., Tang, J., & Vähä-Koskela, M. (2021) · Briefings in Bioinformatics · doi:10.1093/bib/bbaa003 · Cited by 131 · see citing works
Self-citation
Flagged first, then by citations
- Authors
- Savander, S., Curabaz, N. N., Abbasi, A. M., Khan, A., Saeed, K., & Tanoli, Z.
- Affiliations
- University of Helsinki (FI)
- Pakistan Institute of Engineering and Applied Sciences (PK)
- Corresponding author
- Tanoli, Ziaurrehman
- Venue
- Briefings in Bioinformatics
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 2025-11-01
- Volume
- 26
- Issue
- 6
- ISSN
- 1467-5463 (ISSN-L)
- 1477-4054
- PMC
- PMC12641610
- OpenAlex
- W4416738354
- Cited by
- 10
- References
- 4
- Citations by year
- 2026: 10
- FWCI
- 5.15
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
- doi.org
- Licence
- Locations
- Briefings in Bioinformatics (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) (acceptedVersion, public-domain)
- Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Työväentutkimus Vuosikirja (submittedVersion)
- Funders
- Helsingin Yliopisto
- Pakistan Institute of Engineering and Applied Sciences
- Academy of Finland (351507)
- King Abdullah International Medical Research Center
- Helsinki Institute of Life Science, Helsingin Yliopisto
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computational Theory and Mathematics › Computational Drug Discovery Methods
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Bioinformatics and Genomic Networks
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Biomedical Text Mining and Ontologies
- Keywords
- drug repurposing, ChEMBL, BindingDB, GtoPdb, data curation, physicochemical properties, therapeutic groups, compound prioritization, anticancer drug repurposing, FDA-approved drugs
- MeSH terms
- Humans, Computational Biology, Drug Discovery, Drug Repositioning
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review