Computational methods for the detection of cis-regulatory modules
Abstract
Metazoan transcription regulation occurs through the concerted action of multiple transcription factors that bind co-operatively to cis-regulatory modules (CRMs). The annotation of these key regulators of transcription is lagging far behind the annotation of the transcriptome itself. Here, we give an overview of existing computational methods to detect these CRMs in metazoan genomes. We subdivide these methods into three classes: CRM scanners screen sequences for CRMs based on predefined models that often consist of multiple position weight matrices (PWMs). CRM builders construct models of similar CRMs controlling a set of co-regulated or co-expressed genes. CRM genome screeners screen sequences or complete genomes for CRMs as homotypic or heterotypic clusters of binding sites for any combination of transcription factors. We believe that CRM scanners are currently the most advanced methods, although their applicability is limited. Finally, we argue that CRM builders that make use of PWM libraries will benefit greatly from future advances and will prove to be most instrumental for the annotation of regulatory regions in metazoan genomes.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Automatic sequence-based enhancer annotation is helpful but performs modestly for predicting enhancers and the contexts in which they are active.
“Consequent to these limitations, automatic sequence-based enhancer annotation is helpful and worthwhile129, but performs modestly for predicting enhancers and the contexts in which they are active.”
From Towards a comprehensive catalogue of validated and target-linked human enhancers (2020) · cites this paper as [129]
Cites
Xie, X., Lu, J., Kulbokas, E. J., Golub, T. R., Mootha, V., Lindblad-Toh, K., Lander, E. S., & Kellis, M. (2005) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature03441 · Cited by 1,872 · see citing works
Moses, A. M., Chiang, D. Y., Pollard, D. A., Iyer, V. N., & Eisen, M. B. (2004) · Genome Biology · doi:10.1186/gb-2004-5-12-r98 · Cited by 153 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Towards a comprehensive catalogue of validated and target-linked human enhancers
Gasperini, M., Tome, J. M., & Shendure, J. (2020) · Nature Reviews Genetics · doi:10.1038/s41576-019-0209-0 · Cited by 396 · see citing works
- Authors
- Van Loo, P., & Marynen, P.
- Venue
- Briefings in Bioinformatics
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 2009-06-04
- Volume
- 10
- Issue
- 5
- Pages
- 509-524
- ISSN
- 1467-5463 (ISSN-L)
- 1477-4054
- OpenAlex
- W2156885385
- Cited by
- 62
- References
- 2
- Citations by year
- 2023: 1 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 1 · 2018: 1 · 2016: 4 · 2015: 6 · 2014: 5 · 2013: 7 · 2012: 16
- FWCI
- 0.82
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Briefings in Bioinformatics (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Genomics and Chromatin Dynamics
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Genomics and Phylogenetic Studies
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Gene Regulatory Network Analysis
- Keywords
- cis-regulatory modules, transcription factor binding sites, position weight matrices, genome scan, co-regulated genes, metazoan genomes, transcriptional regulation
- MeSH terms
- Algorithms, Animals, Gene Expression Regulation, Humans, Regulatory Sequences, Nucleic Acid, Transcription, Genetic, Sequence Alignment, Sequence Analysis, DNA, Computational Biology
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review