Cited by 62Genomics and Chromatin DynamicsGenomics and Phylogenetic StudiesGene Regulatory Network Analysis

Computational methods for the detection of cis-regulatory modules

Van Loo, P., Marynen, P.·2009·Briefings in Bioinformatics

Abstract

Metazoan transcription regulation occurs through the concerted action of multiple transcription factors that bind co-operatively to cis-regulatory modules (CRMs). The annotation of these key regulators of transcription is lagging far behind the annotation of the transcriptome itself. Here, we give an overview of existing computational methods to detect these CRMs in metazoan genomes. We subdivide these methods into three classes: CRM scanners screen sequences for CRMs based on predefined models that often consist of multiple position weight matrices (PWMs). CRM builders construct models of similar CRMs controlling a set of co-regulated or co-expressed genes. CRM genome screeners screen sequences or complete genomes for CRMs as homotypic or heterotypic clusters of binding sites for any combination of transcription factors. We believe that CRM scanners are currently the most advanced methods, although their applicability is limited. Finally, we argue that CRM builders that make use of PWM libraries will benefit greatly from future advances and will prove to be most instrumental for the annotation of regulatory regions in metazoan genomes.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1093/bib/bbp025

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Automatic sequence-based enhancer annotation is helpful but performs modestly for predicting enhancers and the contexts in which they are active.

    “Consequent to these limitations, automatic sequence-based enhancer annotation is helpful and worthwhile129, but performs modestly for predicting enhancers and the contexts in which they are active.”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Van Loo, P., & Marynen, P.
Venue
Briefings in Bioinformatics
Published
2009-06-04
Volume
10
Issue
5
Pages
509-524
ISSN
  • 1467-5463 (ISSN-L)
  • 1477-4054
OpenAlex
W2156885385
Cited by
62
References
2
Citations by year
2023: 1 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 1 · 2018: 1 · 2016: 4 · 2015: 6 · 2014: 5 · 2013: 7 · 2012: 16
FWCI
0.82
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Briefings in Bioinformatics (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Genomics and Chromatin Dynamics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Genomics and Phylogenetic Studies
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Gene Regulatory Network Analysis
Keywords
cis-regulatory modules, transcription factor binding sites, position weight matrices, genome scan, co-regulated genes, metazoan genomes, transcriptional regulation
MeSH terms
Algorithms, Animals, Gene Expression Regulation, Humans, Regulatory Sequences, Nucleic Acid, Transcription, Genetic, Sequence Alignment, Sequence Analysis, DNA, Computational Biology

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review