Drug–target interaction prediction: databases, web servers and computational models
Open accessAbstract
Identification of drug-target interactions is an important process in drug discovery. Although high-throughput screening and other biological assays are becoming available, experimental methods for drug-target interaction identification remain to be extremely costly, time-consuming and challenging even nowadays. Therefore, various computational models have been developed to predict potential drug-target associations on a large scale. In this review, databases and web servers involved in drug-target identification and drug discovery are summarized. In addition, we mainly introduced some state-of-the-art computational models for drug-target interactions prediction, including network-based method, machine learning-based method and so on. Specially, for the machine learning-based method, much attention was paid to supervised and semi-supervised models, which have essential difference in the adoption of negative samples. Although significant improvements for drug-target interaction prediction have been obtained by many effective computational models, both network-based and machine learning-based methods have their disadvantages, respectively. Furthermore, we discuss the future directions of the network-based drug discovery and network approach for personalized drug discovery based on personalized medicine, genome sequencing, tumor clone-based network and cancer hallmark-based network. Finally, we discussed the new evaluation validation framework and the formulation of drug-target interactions prediction problem by more realistic regression formulation based on quantitative bioactivity data.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In addition to systems biology, computational models are also becoming essential tools in biomedical applications such as drug discovery, pharmacokinetics, and medical devices.
“In addition to systems biology, computational models are also becoming essential tools in biomedical applications such as drug discovery [61], pharmacokinetics [62], and medical devices [63].”
From Adapting modeling and simulation credibility standards to computational systems biology (2023) · cites this paper as [61]
Cites
How many drug targets are there?
Overington, J. P., Al-Lazikani, B., & Hopkins, A. L. (2006) · Nature Reviews Drug Discovery · doi:10.1038/nrd2199 · Cited by 3,505 · see citing works
Comprehensive analysis of kinase inhibitor selectivity
Davis, M. I., Hunt, J. P., Herrgard, S., Ciceri, P., Wodicka, L. M., Pallares, G., Hocker, M., Treiber, D. K., & Zarrinkar, P. P. (2011) · Nature Biotechnology · doi:10.1038/nbt.1990 · Cited by 2,409 · see citing works
SuperTarget and Matador: resources for exploring drug-target relationships
Gunther, S., Kuhn, M., Dunkel, M., Campillos, M., Senger, C., Petsalaki, E., Ahmed, J., Urdiales, E. G., Gewiess, A., Jensen, L. J., et al. (2007) · Nucleic Acids Research · doi:10.1093/nar/gkm862 · Cited by 647 · see citing works
Strategies to Discover Unexpected Targets for Drugs Active at G Protein–Coupled Receptors
Allen, J. A., & Roth, B. L. (2011) · Annual Review of Pharmacology and Toxicology · doi:10.1146/annurev-pharmtox-010510-100553 · Cited by 216 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Counting on natural products for drug design
Rodrigues, T., Reker, D., Schneider, P., & Schneider, G. (2016) · Nature Chemistry · doi:10.1038/nchem.2479 · Cited by 1,250 · see citing works
Machine Learning for Drug-Target Interaction Prediction
Chen, R., Liu, X., Jin, S., Lin, J., & Liu, J. (2018) · Molecules · doi:10.3390/molecules23092208 · Cited by 292 · see citing works
Xuan, P., Sun, C., Zhang, T., Ye, Y., Shen, T., & Dong, Y. (2019) · Frontiers in Genetics · doi:10.3389/fgene.2019.00459 · Cited by 100 · see citing works
Artificial intelligence facilitates drug design in the big data era
Wang, L., Ding, J., Pan, L., Cao, D., Jiang, H., & Ding, X. (2019) · Chemometrics and Intelligent Laboratory Systems · doi:10.1016/j.chemolab.2019.103850 · Cited by 80 · see citing works
DTi2Vec: Drug–target interaction prediction using network embedding and ensemble learning
Thafar, M. A., Olayan, R. S., Albaradei, S., Bajic, V. B., Gojobori, T., Essack, M., & Gao, X. (2021) · Journal of Cheminformatics · doi:10.1186/s13321-021-00552-w · Cited by 70 · see citing works
Success stories of AI in drug discovery - where do things stand?
Mak, K.-K., Balijepalli, M. K., & Pichika, M. R. (2022) · Expert Opinion on Drug Discovery · doi:10.1080/17460441.2022.1985108 · Cited by 51 · see citing works
Adapting modeling and simulation credibility standards to computational systems biology
Tatka, L. T., Smith, L. P., Hellerstein, J. L., & Sauro, H. M. (2023) · Journal of Translational Medicine · doi:10.1186/s12967-023-04290-5 · Cited by 25 · see citing works
- Authors
- Chen, X., Yan, C. C., Zhang, X., Zhang, X., Dai, F., Yin, J., & Zhang, Y.
- Affiliations
- Shandong University (CN)
- Tsinghua University (CN)
- Corresponding author
- Chen, Xing
- Venue
- Briefings in Bioinformatics
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 2015-08-17
- Volume
- 17
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 696-712
- ISSN
- 1467-5463 (ISSN-L)
- 1477-4054
- OpenAlex
- W2259538443
- Cited by
- 658
- References
- 4
- Citations by year
- 2026: 34 · 2025: 69 · 2024: 64 · 2023: 65 · 2022: 84 · 2021: 68 · 2020: 80 · 2019: 76 · 2018: 59 · 2017: 43 · 2016: 16
- FWCI
- 4.23
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
- doi.org
- Locations
- Briefings in Bioinformatics (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- HighWire Press Open Archive (submittedVersion)
- Funders
- Beijing Institute of Technology
- National Center for Mathematics and Interdisciplinary Sciences, Chinese Academy of Sciences
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computational Theory and Mathematics › Computational Drug Discovery Methods
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Bioinformatics and Genomic Networks
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Biomedical Text Mining and Ontologies
- Keywords
- drug-target interaction prediction, web server, network-based methods, machine learning, semi-supervised learning, negative samples, network-based drug discovery, personalized medicine
- MeSH terms
- Humans, Databases, Factual, Drug Delivery Systems, Drug Discovery
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review