Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 804

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 147 of the 147 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Genome, transcriptome and proteome: the rise of omics data and their integration in biomedical sciences

Open access
Manzoni, Claudia, Kia, Demis A, Vandrovcova, Jana, Hardy, John, Wood, Nicholas W, Lewis, Patrick A, Ferrari, Raffaele·2018·Briefings in Bioinformatics

Abstract

Advances in the technologies and informatics used to generate and process large biological data sets (omics data) are promoting a critical shift in the study of biomedical sciences. While genomics, transcriptomics and proteinomics, coupled with bioinformatics and biostatistics, are gaining momentum, they are still, for the most part, assessed individually with distinct approaches generating monothematic rather than integrated knowledge. As other areas of biomedical sciences, including metabolomics, epigenomics and pharmacogenomics, are moving towards the omics scale, we are witnessing the rise of inter-disciplinary data integration strategies to support a better understanding of biological systems and eventually the development of successful precision medicine. This review cuts across the boundaries between genomics, transcriptomics and proteomics, summarizing how omics data are generated, analysed and shared, and provides an overview of the current strengths and weaknesses of this global approach. This work intends to target students and researchers seeking knowledge outside of their field of expertise and fosters a leap from the reductionist to the global-integrative analytical approach in research.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1093/bib/bbw114

Cites

147 of 147 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 147 references

Research works printed but not linked: 5

  1. Vaughan, 2013, Where in the genome are we? A cautionary tale of database use in genomics research, Front Genet, 4, 38., 10.3389/fgene.2013.00038 · doi:10.3389/fgene.2013.00038
  2. Berg, 2002, Biochemistry
  3. Naifang, 2013, Integrative approaches for microRNA target prediction: combining sequence information and the paired mRNA and miRNA expression profiles, Curr Bioinform, 8, 37
  4. Giordano, 2015, Structural flexibility of the heme cavity in the cold-adapted truncated hemoglobin from the Antarctic marine bacterium Pseudoalteromonas haloplanktis TAC125, FEBS J, 282, 2948, 10.1111/febs.13335 · doi:10.1111/febs.13335
  5. Breda, 2008, Bioinformatics in Tropical Disease Research: A Practical and Case-Study Approach

Cited by

See all 804

Metadata

Authors
Manzoni, C., Kia, D. A., Vandrovcova, J., Hardy, J., Wood, N. W., Lewis, P. A., & Ferrari, R.
Venue
Briefings in Bioinformatics
Published
2016-11-22
Volume
19
Issue
2
Pages
286-302
ISSN
  • 1467-5463 (ISSN-L)
  • 1477-4054
OpenAlex
W2550535012
Cited by
804
References
147
FWCI
15.35
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
hybrid
Funders
  • Wellcome Trust (089698/Z/09/Z, 091673/Z/10/Z)
  • MRC (WT089698)
  • University of Sheffield
  • Medical Research Council (MR/N026004/1, MR/L010933/1)
  • University College London
  • NIHR

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Genome, transcriptome and proteome: the rise of omics data and their integration in biomedical sciences. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1093/bib/bbw114
The paper
Manzoni, C., Kia, D. A., Vandrovcova, J., Hardy, J., Wood, N. W., Lewis, P. A., & Ferrari, R. (2018). Genome, transcriptome and proteome: the rise of omics data and their integration in biomedical sciences. Briefings in Bioinformatics. https://doi.org/10.1093/bib/bbw114

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.