Cited by 173Genomics and Rare DiseasesGenomics and Phylogenetic StudiesGenetics, Bioinformatics, and Biomedical Research

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 208 of the 208 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Review of applications of high-throughput sequencing in personalized medicine: barriers and facilitators of future progress in research and clinical application

Open access

Abstract

There has been an exponential growth in the performance and output of sequencing technologies (omics data) with full genome sequencing now producing gigabases of reads on a daily basis. These data may hold the promise of personalized medicine, leading to routinely available sequencing tests that can guide patient treatment decisions. In the era of high-throughput sequencing (HTS), computational considerations, data governance and clinical translation are the greatest rate-limiting steps. To ensure that the analysis, management and interpretation of such extensive omics data is exploited to its full potential, key factors, including sample sourcing, technology selection and computational expertise and resources, need to be considered, leading to an integrated set of high-performance tools and systems. This article provides an up-to-date overview of the evolution of HTS and the accompanying tools, infrastructure and data management approaches that are emerging in this space, which, if used within in a multidisciplinary context, may ultimately facilitate the development of personalized medicine.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1093/bib/bby051

Cites

208 of 208 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Items 201–208 of 208

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 39

  1. Fikes, 2017, New machines can sequence human genome in one hour, Illumina announces, The San Diego Union-Tribune
  2. Edico Genome, 2018, DRAGEN Bio-IT platform
  3. Wetterstrand, 2017, DNA sequencing costs: data from the NHGRI Genome Sequencing Program (GSP)
  4. NCI, 2017, Definition of personalized medicine—National Cancer Institute Dictionary of Cancer Terms
  5. NCCN, 2018, National Comprehensive Cancer Network—NCCB clinical practice guidelines in oncology
  6. Qiagen, 2018, GeneRead Sequencing (NGS)
  7. Genomics England, 2014, UK to become world number one in DNA testing with plan to revolutionise fight against cancer and rare diseases
  8. ScienceCloud, 2017, A secure cloud solution
  9. DNAnexus, 2017, DNAnexus
  10. The Apache Software Foundation, 2014, Welcome to ApacheTM Hadoop®!
  11. Illumina, 2017, BaseSpace Sequence Hub
  12. SevenBridges, 2018, Actionable informatics for biomedical research
  13. Dydel, 2004, Field Programmable Logic and Application. FPL 2004, Lecture Notes in Computer Science, 23
  14. Melanakos, 2008, Parallel computing on a personal computer
  15. Carr, 2011, SeqNFind®: a GPU accelerated sequence analysis toolset facilitates bioinformatics, 1
  16. NVIDIA, 2017, CUDA GPUs
  17. AWS, 2017, Amazon elastic compute cloud (EC2)
  18. Microsoft Azure, 2017, Microsoft Azure: cloud computing platform and services
  19. Xilinx, 2018, Xilinx: Vivado design suite
  20. Intel, 2018, Intel FPGA SDK for OpenCL—overview
  21. Intel Altera, 2018, Intel® FPGA Acceleration Hub—acceleration stack for Intel INTEL® FPGA Acceleration Hub—Xeon CPU with FPGAs
  22. Fieldman, 2016, Microsoft goes all in for FPGAs to build out AI cloud | TOP500 supercomputer sites
  23. AWS, 2018, Amazon EC2 F1 instances—run customizable FPGAs in the AWS cloud
  24. NHGRI, 2017, Electronic Medical Records and Genomics (eMERGE) Network
  25. US Congress, 2008, H.R.493—110th Congress (2007-2008): genetic information nondiscrimination act of 2008
  26. AWS, 2018, Cloud compliance—Amazon Web Services (AWS) compliance
  27. Microsoft Azure, 2017, Big compute: HPC and batch large-scale cloud computing power on demand
  28. BC Platforms, 2017, BC platforms—software platforms for next-generation sequencing
  29. NCBI, 2017, GenBank home
  30. ENA, 2018, European nucleotide archive
  31. Benson, 2013, GenBank, Nucleic Acids Res, 41, D36
  32. EMBL-EBI, 2017, ArrayExpress—functional genomics data
  33. US Congress, 2017, Text—H.R.1313—115th Congress (2017-2018): preserving employee wellness programs act
  34. Sun, 2017, Employees who decline genetic testing could face penalties under proposed bill, The Washington Post
  35. Herper, 2017, Illumina promises to sequence human genome for $100—but not quite yet
  36. Heger, 2017, Illumina unveils new high-throughput sequencing instrument at JP Morgan
  37. AWS, 2015, Architecting for HIPAA security and compliance on Amazon Web Services
  38. AstraZeneca, 2017, Research-based BioPharmaceutical Company
  39. Human Proteome Organisation, 2018, The HUPO proteomics standards initiative

Cited by

Sorted by citations

See all 173

Metadata

Authors
Lightbody, G., Haberland, V., Browne, F., Taggart, L., Zheng, H., Parkes, E., & Blayney, J. K.
Affiliations
  • University of Ulster (GB)
  • University of Bristol (GB)
  • Almac (United Kingdom) (GB)
  • Queen's University Belfast (GB)
Corresponding author
Lightbody, Gaye
Venue
Briefings in Bioinformatics
Published
2019-06-14
Volume
20
Issue
5
Pages
1795-1811
ISSN
  • 1467-5463 (ISSN-L)
  • 1477-4054
OpenAlex
W2885591122
Cited by
173
References
208
Citations by year
2026: 11 · 2025: 20 · 2024: 26 · 2023: 27 · 2022: 34 · 2021: 25 · 2020: 21 · 2019: 8
FWCI
1.92
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Briefings in Bioinformatics (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Brunel University Research Archive (BURA) (Brunel University London) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
  • Research Portal (Queen's University Belfast) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
  • Ulster University Research Portal (Ulster University) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
  • Explore Bristol Research (submittedVersion, cc-by)
  • Bristol Research (University of Bristol) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
  • UEA Digital Repository (University of East Anglia) (submittedVersion)
Funders
Academy of Medical Sciences (SGL017\1064)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Genomics and Rare Diseases
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Genomics and Phylogenetic Studies
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Genetics, Bioinformatics, and Biomedical Research
Keywords
next-generation sequencing, personalized medicine, clinical translation, data governance, computational genomics, genomic data interpretation, bioinformatics infrastructure
MeSH terms
Cloud Computing, Ethics, Computer Security, Computational Biology, Biomedical Research, Precision Medicine, High-Throughput Nucleotide Sequencing

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review