SPECK: an unsupervised learning approach for cell surface receptor abundance estimation for single-cell RNA-sequencing data
Open accessPublished version of a preprint
Abstract
Summary: The rapid development of single-cell transcriptomics has revolutionized the study of complex tissues. Single-cell RNA-sequencing (scRNA-seq) can profile tens-of-thousands of dissociated cells from a tissue sample, enabling researchers to identify cell types, phenotypes and interactions that control tissue structure and function. A key requirement of these applications is the accurate estimation of cell surface protein abundance. Although technologies to directly quantify surface proteins are available, these data are uncommon and limited to proteins with available antibodies. While supervised methods that are trained on Cellular Indexing of Transcriptomes and Epitopes by Sequencing data can provide the best performance, these training data are limited by available antibodies and may not exist for the tissue under investigation. In the absence of protein measurements, researchers must estimate receptor abundance from scRNA-seq data. Therefore, we developed a new unsupervised method for receptor abundance estimation using scRNA-seq data called SPECK (Surface Protein abundance Estimation using CKmeans-based clustered thresholding) and primarily evaluated its performance against unsupervised approaches for at least 25 human receptors and multiple tissue types. This analysis reveals that techniques based on a thresholded reduced rank reconstruction of scRNA-seq data are effective for receptor abundance estimation, with SPECK providing the best overall performance. Availability and implementation: SPECK is freely available at https://CRAN.R-project.org/package=SPECK. Supplementary information: Supplementary data are available at Bioinformatics Advances online.
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Cites
Stem cell transcriptome profiling via massive-scale mRNA sequencing
Cloonan, N., Forrest, A. R. R., Kolle, G., Gardiner, B. B. A., Faulkner, G. J., Brown, M. K., Taylor, D. F., Steptoe, A. L., Wani, S., Bethel, G., et al. (2008) · Nature Methods · doi:10.1038/nmeth.1223 · Cited by 1,035 · cited 4× · see citing works
“The Annals of Statistics, 29(2):295–327, 2001.”
InfluentialDynamic profiling of the protein life cycle in response to pathogens
Jovanovic, M., Rooney, M. S., Mertins, P., Przybylski, D., Chevrier, N., Satija, R., Rodriguez, E. H., Fields, A. P., Schwartz, S., Raychowdhury, R., et al. (2015) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1259038 · Cited by 460 · see citing works
Li, J. J., Bickel, P. J., & Biggin, M. D. (2014) · PeerJ · doi:10.7717/peerj.270 · Cited by 279 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
- Authors
- Javaid, A., & Frost, H. R.
- Affiliations
- Dartmouth College (US)
- Corresponding author
- Javaid, Azka
- Frost, H Robert
- Venue
- Bioinformatics Advances
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 2023-01-01
- Volume
- 3
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- vbad073-vbad073
- ISSN
- 2635-0041 (ISSN-L)
- PMC
- PMC10290233
- OpenAlex
- W4380630598
- Cited by
- 8
- References
- 3
- Citations by year
- 2026: 1 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 1
- FWCI
- 0.71
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
- doi.org
- Locations
- Bioinformatics Advances (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) (acceptedVersion, cc-by-nd)
- PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- National Institutes of Health (R35GM146586, R21CA253408, P20GM130454, P30CA023108)
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Single-cell and spatial transcriptomics
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Gene expression and cancer classification
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Genomics and Phylogenetic Studies
- Keywords
- single-cell RNA sequencing, unsupervised learning, CITE-seq, thresholding, cell type annotation, tissue structure and function
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review