Cited by 8Single-cell and spatial transcriptomicsGene expression and cancer classificationGenomics and Phylogenetic Studies

SPECK: an unsupervised learning approach for cell surface receptor abundance estimation for single-cell RNA-sequencing data

Open access
Javaid, Azka, Frost, H Robert·2023·Bioinformatics Advances

Published version of a preprint

Abstract

Summary: The rapid development of single-cell transcriptomics has revolutionized the study of complex tissues. Single-cell RNA-sequencing (scRNA-seq) can profile tens-of-thousands of dissociated cells from a tissue sample, enabling researchers to identify cell types, phenotypes and interactions that control tissue structure and function. A key requirement of these applications is the accurate estimation of cell surface protein abundance. Although technologies to directly quantify surface proteins are available, these data are uncommon and limited to proteins with available antibodies. While supervised methods that are trained on Cellular Indexing of Transcriptomes and Epitopes by Sequencing data can provide the best performance, these training data are limited by available antibodies and may not exist for the tissue under investigation. In the absence of protein measurements, researchers must estimate receptor abundance from scRNA-seq data. Therefore, we developed a new unsupervised method for receptor abundance estimation using scRNA-seq data called SPECK (Surface Protein abundance Estimation using CKmeans-based clustered thresholding) and primarily evaluated its performance against unsupervised approaches for at least 25 human receptors and multiple tissue types. This analysis reveals that techniques based on a thresholded reduced rank reconstruction of scRNA-seq data are effective for receptor abundance estimation, with SPECK providing the best overall performance. Availability and implementation: SPECK is freely available at https://CRAN.R-project.org/package=SPECK. Supplementary information: Supplementary data are available at Bioinformatics Advances online.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1093/bioadv/vbad073

Cites

3 of 3 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Authors
Javaid, A., & Frost, H. R.
Affiliations
Dartmouth College (US)
Corresponding author
  • Javaid, Azka
  • Frost, H Robert
Venue
Bioinformatics Advances
Published
2023-01-01
Volume
3
Issue
1
Pages
vbad073-vbad073
ISSN
2635-0041 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4380630598
Cited by
8
References
3
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 1
FWCI
0.71
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Bioinformatics Advances (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) (acceptedVersion, cc-by-nd)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
National Institutes of Health (R35GM146586, R21CA253408, P20GM130454, P30CA023108)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Single-cell and spatial transcriptomics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Gene expression and cancer classification
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Genomics and Phylogenetic Studies
Keywords
single-cell RNA sequencing, unsupervised learning, CITE-seq, thresholding, cell type annotation, tissue structure and function

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review