TITINdb2—expanding annotation and structural information for protein variants in the giant sarcomeric protein titin
Open accessPublished version of a preprint
Abstract
Summary: We present TITINdb2, an update to the TITINdb database previously constructed to facilitate the identification of pathogenic missense variants in the giant protein titin, which are associated with a variety of skeletal and cardiac myopathies. The database and web portal have been substantially revised and include the following new features: (i) an increase in computational annotation from 4 to 20 variant impact predictors, available through a new custom data table dialogue; (ii) through structural coverage of single domains with AlphaFold2 predicted models; (iii) newly predicted domain–domain interface annotations; (iv) an expanded in silico saturation mutagenesis incorporating four variant impact predictors; (v) a comprehensive overhaul of available data, including population data sources and variants reported pathogenic in the literature; and (vi) a curated mapping of existing protein, transcript, and chromosomal sequence positions and a new variant conversion tool to translate variants in one format to any other format. Availability and implementation: The database is accessible via titindb.kcl.ac.uk/TITINdb/.
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Cites
Highly accurate protein structure prediction with AlphaFold
Jumper, J., Evans, R., Pritzel, A., Green, T., Figurnov, M., Ronneberger, O., Tunyasuvunakool, K., Bates, R., Žídek, A., Potapenko, A., et al. (2021) · Nature · doi:10.1038/s41586-021-03819-2 · Cited by 43,764 · see citing works
Deep mutational scanning: a new style of protein science
Fowler, D. M., & Fields, S. (2014) · Nature Methods · doi:10.1038/nmeth.3027 · Cited by 1,287 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
- Authors
- Weston, T., Ng, J., Gracia Carmona, O., Gautel, M., & Fraternali, F.
- Affiliations
- King's College London (GB)
- Institute of Structural and Molecular Biology (GB)
- Randall Centre for Cell & Molecular Biophysics, School of Basic & Medical Biosciences, King’s College London , London SE1 1UL,
- Corresponding author
- Fraternali, Franca
- Venue
- Bioinformatics Advances
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 2024-12-26
- Volume
- 5
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- vbaf062-vbaf062
- ISSN
- 2635-0041 (ISSN-L)
- PMC
- PMC12017618
- OpenAlex
- W4408746407
- Cited by
- 3
- References
- 2
- Citations by year
- 2026: 2 · 2025: 1
- FWCI
- 0.80
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
- doi.org
- Licence
- Locations
- Bioinformatics Advances (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) (acceptedVersion)
- PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- National Institute for Health Research
- Biomedical Research Centre
- Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council (BB/T002212/1)
- Heart Foundation (RG/15/8/31480, RG/F/22/110079)
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Genomics and Rare Diseases
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine › Cardiomyopathy and Myosin Studies
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Genomics and Phylogenetic Studies
- Keywords
- titin, skeletal myopathy, cardiomyopathy, domain-domain interfaces, saturation mutagenesis, variant annotation
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review