Cited by 12Machine Learning in BioinformaticsProtein Structure and DynamicsComputational Drug Discovery Methods

MULAN: multimodal protein language model for sequence and structure encoding

Open access
Frolova, Daria, Pak, Marina, Litvin, Anna, Sharov, Ilya, Ivankov, Dmitry, Oseledets, Ivan·2024·Bioinformatics Advances

Published version of a preprint

Abstract

Motivation: Most protein language models (PLMs) produce high-quality representations using only protein sequences. However, incorporating known protein structures is important for many prediction tasks, leading to increased interest in structure-aware PLMs. Currently, structure-aware PLMs are either trained from scratch or add significant parameter overhead for the structure encoder. Results: In this study, we propose MULAN, a MULtimodal PLM for both sequence and ANgle-based structure encoding. MULAN has a pre-trained sequence encoder and an introduced parameter-efficient Structure Adapter, which are then fused and trained together. Based on the evaluation of nine downstream tasks, MULAN models of various sizes show a quality improvement compared to both sequence-only ESM2 and structure-aware SaProt. The main improvements are shown for the protein–protein interaction prediction (up to 0.12 in AUROC). Importantly, unlike other models, MULAN offers a cheap increase in structural awareness of protein representations because of the finetuning of existing PLMs instead of training from scratch. We perform a detailed analysis of the proposed model and demonstrate its awareness of the protein structure. Availability and implementation: The implementation, training data, and model checkpoints are available at https://github.com/DFrolova/MULAN.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1093/bioadv/vbaf117

Cites

8 of 8 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Authors
Frolova, D., Pak, M., Litvin, A., Sharov, I., Ivankov, D., & Oseledets, I.
Affiliations
Skolkovo Institute of Science and Technology (RU)
Corresponding author
Frolova, Daria
Venue
Bioinformatics Advances
Published
2024-12-26
Volume
5
Issue
1
Pages
vbaf117-vbaf117
ISSN
2635-0041 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4410572064
Cited by
12
References
8
Citations by year
2026: 8 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 1
FWCI
1.63
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Bioinformatics Advances (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) (acceptedVersion, cc-by)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Machine Learning in Bioinformatics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Protein Structure and Dynamics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computational Theory and Mathematics › Computational Drug Discovery Methods
Keywords
protein language models, protein-protein interaction prediction, protein sequence encoding, ESM-2, pre-trained model fine-tuning

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review