MULAN: multimodal protein language model for sequence and structure encoding
Open accessPublished version of a preprint
Abstract
Motivation: Most protein language models (PLMs) produce high-quality representations using only protein sequences. However, incorporating known protein structures is important for many prediction tasks, leading to increased interest in structure-aware PLMs. Currently, structure-aware PLMs are either trained from scratch or add significant parameter overhead for the structure encoder. Results: In this study, we propose MULAN, a MULtimodal PLM for both sequence and ANgle-based structure encoding. MULAN has a pre-trained sequence encoder and an introduced parameter-efficient Structure Adapter, which are then fused and trained together. Based on the evaluation of nine downstream tasks, MULAN models of various sizes show a quality improvement compared to both sequence-only ESM2 and structure-aware SaProt. The main improvements are shown for the protein–protein interaction prediction (up to 0.12 in AUROC). Importantly, unlike other models, MULAN offers a cheap increase in structural awareness of protein representations because of the finetuning of existing PLMs instead of training from scratch. We perform a detailed analysis of the proposed model and demonstrate its awareness of the protein structure. Availability and implementation: The implementation, training data, and model checkpoints are available at https://github.com/DFrolova/MULAN.
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Cites
Highly accurate protein structure prediction with AlphaFold
Jumper, J., Evans, R., Pritzel, A., Green, T., Figurnov, M., Ronneberger, O., Tunyasuvunakool, K., Bates, R., Žídek, A., Potapenko, A., et al. (2021) · Nature · doi:10.1038/s41586-021-03819-2 · Cited by 43,764 · see citing works
Evolutionary-scale prediction of atomic level protein structure with a language model
Lin, Z., Akin, H., Rao, R., Hie, B., Zhu, Z., Lu, W., Smetanin, N., Verkuil, R., Kabeli, O., Shmueli, Y., et al. (2022) · doi:10.1101/2022.07.20.500902 · Cited by 5,523 · see citing works
Fast and accurate protein structure search with Foldseek
van Kempen, M., Kim, S. S., Tumescheit, C., Mirdita, M., Lee, J., Gilchrist, C. L. M., Söding, J., & Steinegger, M. (2022) · doi:10.1101/2022.02.07.479398 · Cited by 2,598 · see citing works
Fast and accurate protein structure search with Foldseek
van Kempen, M., Kim, S. S., Tumescheit, C., Mirdita, M., Lee, J., Gilchrist, C. L. M., Söding, J., & Steinegger, M. (2024) · Nature Biotechnology · doi:10.1038/s41587-023-01773-0 · Cited by 2,596 · see citing works
ProtTrans: Toward Understanding the Language of Life Through Self-Supervised Learning
Elnaggar, A., Heinzinger, M., Dallago, C., Rehawi, G., Wang, Y., Jones, L., Gibbs, T., Feher, T., Angerer, C., Steinegger, M., et al. (2022) · IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence · doi:10.1109/tpami.2021.3095381 · Cited by 2,329 · see citing works
Evaluating Protein Transfer Learning with TAPE
Rao, R., Bhattacharya, N., Thomas, N., Duan, Y., Chen, X., Canny, J., Abbeel, P., & Song, Y. S. (2019) · doi:10.1101/676825 · Cited by 719 · see citing works
Modeling the language of life – Deep Learning Protein Sequences
Heinzinger, M., Elnaggar, A., Wang, Y., Dallago, C., Nechaev, D., Matthes, F., & Rost, B. (2019) · doi:10.1101/614313 · Cited by 606 · see citing works
Local fitness landscape of the green fluorescent protein
Sarkisyan, K. S., Bolotin, D. A., Meer, M. V., Usmanova, D. R., Mishin, A. S., Sharonov, G. V., Ivankov, D. N., Bozhanova, N. G., Baranov, M. S., Soylemez, O., et al. (2016) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature17995 · Cited by 591 · see citing works
Self-citation
Flagged first, then by citations
- Authors
- Frolova, D., Pak, M., Litvin, A., Sharov, I., Ivankov, D., & Oseledets, I.
- Affiliations
- Skolkovo Institute of Science and Technology (RU)
- Corresponding author
- Frolova, Daria
- Venue
- Bioinformatics Advances
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 2024-12-26
- Volume
- 5
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- vbaf117-vbaf117
- ISSN
- 2635-0041 (ISSN-L)
- PMC
- PMC12452268
- OpenAlex
- W4410572064
- Cited by
- 12
- References
- 8
- Citations by year
- 2026: 8 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 1
- FWCI
- 1.63
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
- doi.org
- Locations
- Bioinformatics Advances (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) (acceptedVersion, cc-by)
- Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Machine Learning in Bioinformatics
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Protein Structure and Dynamics
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computational Theory and Mathematics › Computational Drug Discovery Methods
- Keywords
- protein language models, protein-protein interaction prediction, protein sequence encoding, ESM-2, pre-trained model fine-tuning
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review