Cited by 3Machine Learning in BioinformaticsBioinformatics and Genomic NetworksGenomics and Phylogenetic Studies

EC-Bench: a benchmark for enzyme commission number prediction

Open access
Davoudi, Saeedeh, Henry, Christopher S, Miller, Christopher S, Banaei-Kashani, Farnoush·2026·Bioinformatics Advances

Published version of a preprint

Abstract

Motivation: Enzymes are proteins that catalyze specific biochemical reactions in cells. Enzyme Commission (EC) numbers are used to annotate enzymes in a four-level hierarchy that classifies enzymes based on the specific chemical reactions they catalyze. Accurate EC number prediction is essential for understanding enzyme functions. Despite the availability of numerous methods for predicting EC numbers from protein sequences, there is no unified framework for evaluating and studying such methods systematically. This gap limits the ability of the community to identify the most effective approaches for enzyme annotation. Results: We introduce EC-Bench, a benchmark for EC number prediction, consisting of (i) an initial representative set of existing methods (including homology-based, deep learning, contrastive learning, and language model methods), (ii) existing and novel accuracy and efficiency performance metrics, and (iii) selected datasets to allow for comprehensive comparative study. EC-Bench is open-source and provides a framework for researchers to not only compare among existing methods objectively under uniform conditions, but also to introduce and effectively evaluate performance of new methods in a comparative framework. To demonstrate the utility of EC-Bench, we perform extensive experimentation to compare the existing EC number prediction methods and establish their advantages and disadvantages in a variety of prediction tasks, namely “exact EC number prediction,” “EC number completion,” and (partial or additional) “EC number recommendation.” We find wide variation in the performance of different methods, but also subtle but potentially useful differences in the performance of different methods across tasks and for different parts of the EC hierarchy. Availability and implementation: The benchmarking pipeline is available at https://github.com/dsaeedeh/EC-Bench.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1093/bioadv/vbag004

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Authors
Davoudi, S., Henry, C. S., Miller, C. S., & Banaei-Kashani, F.
Affiliations
  • Department of Computer Science and Engineering, University of Colorado Denver , Denver, CO, 80204,
  • Argonne National Laboratory (US)
  • University of Colorado Denver (US)
Corresponding author
Miller, Christopher S
Venue
Bioinformatics Advances
Published
2026
Volume
6
Issue
1
Pages
vbag004-vbag004
ISSN
2635-0041 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W7120165331
Cited by
3
References
2
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 1
FWCI
4.13
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Bioinformatics Advances (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) (acceptedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
Funders
US Department of Energy Office of Science, Office of Biological and Environmental Research (DE-SC0021350)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Machine Learning in Bioinformatics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Bioinformatics and Genomic Networks
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Genomics and Phylogenetic Studies
Keywords
benchmark, protein sequence classification, homology-based prediction, deep learning, contrastive learning, language models, performance indicators

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review