Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 294

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Removing near-neighbour redundancy from large protein sequence collections.

Open access
Holm, L, Sander, C·1998·Bioinformatics

Abstract

MOTIVATION: To maximize the chances of biological discovery, homology searching must use an up-to-date collection of sequences. However, the available sequence databases are growing rapidly and are partially redundant in content. This leads to increasing strain on CPU resources and decreasing density of first-hand annotation. RESULTS: These problems are addressed by clustering closely similar sequences to yield a covering of sequence space by a representative subset of sequences. No pair of sequences in the representative set has >90% mutual sequence identity. The representative set is derived by an exhaustive search for close similarities in the sequence database in which the need for explicit sequence alignment is significantly reduced by applying deca- and pentapeptide composition filters. The algorithm was applied to the union of the Swissprot, Swissnew, Trembl, Tremblnew, Genbank, PIR, Wormpep and PDB databases. The all-against-all comparison required to generate a representative set at 90% sequence identity was accomplished in 2 days CPU time, and the removal of fragments and close similarities yielded a size reduction of 46%, from 260 000 unique sequences to 140 000 representative sequences. The practical implications are (i) faster homology searches using, for example, Fasta or Blast, and (ii) unified annotation for all sequences clustered around a representative. As tens of thousands of sequence searches are performed daily world-wide, appropriate use of the non-redundant database can lead to major savings in computer resources, without loss of efficacy. AVAILABILITY: A regularly updated non-redundant protein sequence database (nrdb90), a server for homology searches against nrdb90, and a Perl script (nrdb90.pl) implementing the algorithm are available for academic use from http://www.embl-ebi.ac. uk/holm/nrdb90. CONTACT: holm@embl-ebi.ac.uk

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1093/bioinformatics/14.5.423

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

See all 294

Metadata

Authors
Holm, L., & Sander, C.
Venue
Bioinformatics
Published
1998-06-01
Volume
14
Issue
5
Pages
423-429
ISSN
  • 1367-4803 (ISSN-L)
  • 1367-4811
OpenAlex
W2062296203
Cited by
294
References
0
FWCI
4.84
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
bronze

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Removing near-neighbour redundancy from large protein sequence collections. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1093/bioinformatics/14.5.423
The paper
Holm, L., & Sander, C. (1998). Removing near-neighbour redundancy from large protein sequence collections. Bioinformatics. https://doi.org/10.1093/bioinformatics/14.5.423

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.