The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
DNA sequence quality trimming and vector removal
Abstract
Motivation: Most sequence comparison methods assume that the data being compared are trustworthy, but this is not the case with raw DNA sequences obtained from automatic sequencing machines. Nevertheless, sequence comparisons need to be done on them in order to remove vector splice sites and contaminants. This step is necessary before other genomic data processing stages can be carried out, such as fragment assembly or EST clustering. A specialized tool is therefore needed to solve this apparent dilemma. Results: We have designed and implemented a program that specifically addresses the problem. This program, called Lucy, has been in use since 1998 at The Institute for Genomic Research (TIGR). During this period, many rounds of experience-driven modifications were made to Lucy to improve its accuracy and its ability to deal with extremely difficult input cases. We believe we have finally obtained a useful program which strikes a delicate balance among the many issues involved in the raw sequence cleaning problem, and we wish to share it with the research community. Availability: Lucy is available directly from TIGR (http://www.tigr.org/softlab). Academic users can download Lucy after accepting a free academic use license. Business users may need to pay a license fee to use Lucy for commercial purposes. Contact: Questions regarding the quality assessment module of Lucy should be directed to Michael Holmes (mholmes@tigr.org). Questions regarding other aspects of Lucy should be directed to Hui-Hsien Chou (hhchou@iastate.edu).
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Base-Calling of Automated Sequencer Traces Using Phred. II. Error Probabilities
Ewing, B., & Green, P. (1998) · Genome Research · doi:10.1101/gr.8.3.186 · Cited by 5,439
Cited by
Clonal Integration of a Polyomavirus in Human Merkel Cell Carcinoma
Feng, H., Shuda, M., Chang, Y., & Moore, P. S. (2008) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1152586 · Cited by 3,208
Reducing the Effects of PCR Amplification and Sequencing Artifacts on 16S rRNA-Based Studies
Schloss, P. D., Gevers, D., & Westcott, S. L. (2011) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0027310 · Cited by 2,112
A physical, genetic and functional sequence assembly of the barley genome
The International Barley Genome Sequencing Consortium (2012) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature11543 · Cited by 1,456
The draft genome of the transgenic tropical fruit tree papaya (Carica papaya Linnaeus)
Ming, R., Hou, S., Feng, Y., Yu, Q., Dionne-Laporte, A., Saw, J. H., Senin, P., Wang, W., Ly, B. V., Lewis, K. L. T., et al. (2008) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature06856 · Cited by 1,084
Chevreux, B., Pfisterer, T., Drescher, B., Driesel, A. J., Müller, W. E. G., Wetter, T., & Suhai, S. (2004) · Genome Research · doi:10.1101/gr.1917404 · Cited by 1,050
Metadata
- Authors
- Chou, H.-H., & Holmes, M. H.
- Venue
- Bioinformatics
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 2001-12-01
- Volume
- 17
- Issue
- 12
- Pages
- 1093-1104
- ISSN
- 1367-4803 (ISSN-L)
- 1367-4811
- OpenAlex
- W1985726486
- Cited by
- 519
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 1.95
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: DNA sequence quality trimming and vector removal. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1093/bioinformatics/17.12.1093
- The paper
- Chou, H.-H., & Holmes, M. H. (2001). DNA sequence quality trimming and vector removal. Bioinformatics. https://doi.org/10.1093/bioinformatics/17.12.1093
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.