The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
A simple algorithm to infer gene duplication and speciation events on a gene tree
Open accessAbstract
Motivation: When analyzing protein sequences using sequence similarity searches, orthologous sequences (that diverged by speciation) are more reliable predictors of a new protein’s function than paralogous sequences (that diverged by gene duplication), because duplication enables functional diversification. The utility of phylogenetic information in high-throughput genome annotation (‘phylogenomics’) is widely recognized, but existing approaches are either manual or indirect (e.g. not based on phylogenetic trees). Our goal is to automate phylogenomics using explicit phylogenetic inference. A necessary component is an algorithm to infer speciation and duplication events in a given gene tree. Results: We give an algorithm to infer speciation and duplication events on a gene tree by comparison to a trusted species tree. This algorithm has a worst-case running time of O(\batchmode \documentclass[fleqn,10pt,legalpaper]{article} \usepackage{amssymb} \usepackage{amsfonts} \usepackage{amsmath} \pagestyle{empty} \begin{document} \(n^{2}\) \end{document}) which is inferior to two previous algorithms that are \batchmode \documentclass[fleqn,10pt,legalpaper]{article} \usepackage{amssymb} \usepackage{amsfonts} \usepackage{amsmath} \pagestyle{empty} \begin{document} \({\sim}\) \end{document}O(\batchmode \documentclass[fleqn,10pt,legalpaper]{article} \usepackage{amssymb} \usepackage{amsfonts} \usepackage{amsmath} \pagestyle{empty} \begin{document} \(n\) \end{document}) for a gene tree of \batchmode \documentclass[fleqn,10pt,legalpaper]{article} \usepackage{amssymb} \usepackage{amsfonts} \usepackage{amsmath} \pagestyle{empty} \begin{document} \(n\) \end{document}sequences. However, our algorithm is extremely simple, and its asymptotic worst case behavior is only realized on pathological data sets. We show empirically, using 1750 gene trees constructed from the Pfam protein family database, that it appears to be a practical (and often superior) algorithm for analyzing real gene trees. Availability: http://www.genetics.wustl.edu/eddy/forester Contact: zmasek@genetics.wustl.edu; eddy@genetics.wustl.edu
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Evidence for a clade of nematodes, arthropods and other moulting animals
Aguinaldo, A. M. A., Turbeville, J. M., Linford, L. S., Rivera, M. C., Garey, J. R., Raff, R. A., & Lake, J. A. (1997) · Nature · doi:10.1038/387489a0 · Cited by 1,609
Cited by
MEGA7: Molecular Evolutionary Genetics Analysis Version 7.0 for Bigger Datasets
Kumar, S., Stecher, G., & Tamura, K. (2016) · Molecular Biology and Evolution · doi:10.1093/molbev/msw054 · Cited by 44,059
OrthoFinder: phylogenetic orthology inference for comparative genomics
Emms, D. M., & Kelly, S. (2019) · Genome Biology · doi:10.1186/s13059-019-1832-y · Cited by 7,676
TreeFam: a curated database of phylogenetic trees of animal gene families
Li, H. (2006) · Nucleic Acids Research · doi:10.1093/nar/gkj118 · Cited by 523
Gene Family Evolution across 12 Drosophila Genomes
Hahn, M. W., Han, M. V., & Han, S.-G. (2007) · PLoS Genetics · doi:10.1371/journal.pgen.0030197 · Cited by 355
The life and death of gene families
Demuth, J. P., & Hahn, M. W. (2009) · BioEssays · doi:10.1002/bies.080085 · Cited by 311
Metadata
- Authors
- Zmasek, C. M., & Eddy, S. R.
- Venue
- Bioinformatics
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 2001-09-01
- Volume
- 17
- Issue
- 9
- Pages
- 821-828
- ISSN
- 1367-4803 (ISSN-L)
- 1367-4811
- OpenAlex
- W2124105487
- Cited by
- 205
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 1.19
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: A simple algorithm to infer gene duplication and speciation events on a gene tree. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1093/bioinformatics/17.9.821
- The paper
- Zmasek, C. M., & Eddy, S. R. (2001). A simple algorithm to infer gene duplication and speciation events on a gene tree. Bioinformatics. https://doi.org/10.1093/bioinformatics/17.9.821
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.